highest p3 clock speed?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • linuxguru
    replied
    Re: highest p3 clock speed?

    Originally posted by RJARRRPCGP
    It was likely cancelled, because of TDP issues. It would make better sense on a desktop. If Intel could tweak the transistors and silicon enough to keep a lower wattage while raising the clock on the PI, then it could have been a perfect stop gap, especially for socket 7 boards.
    The 300 MHz Tillamooks had decently low TDP specs, below 10W, IIRC. They were comparable to or lower than the first PII mobile modules. The reason they were canned is possibly due to marketing reasons - the market was willing to pay more for a PII notebook than a Pentium MMX at the same clock. Actually, the market was willing to pay more for a Covington Celeron 266 MHz with 0 L2 cache, than it was willing to pay for a 300 MHz Tillamook.

    For desktops, Intel had already lost the Socket-7 race to the competition, mainly the AMD K6-II and K6-III. The latter was seriously fast, even at its lowest clock bin of 400 or 450 MHz. The problem was that it came too late and too low quantities to make a dent in the desktop market, which was transitioning from Socket-7 to Slot-1 anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gordon01
    replied
    Re: highest p3 clock speed?

    Originally posted by shovenose
    YEAH someone agrees with me that p3 archetitecture is better than p4 netburst shit!
    I agree.
    Also, Willamate arch is even worst then Nothwood. Especially if it is a Celeron with 128 kb cache.
    You can google that Core/Conroe arch is based on a Tualatin, not northwood/willamate. We all know how much better Core against P4.
    Northwood is developed in right time to easily increase GHz marketing numbers so they perceived much faster than AMDs. Also remember massive Pentium 4 advertising. Intel want make money with less effort in that days and they made it.

    Leave a comment:


  • RJARRRPCGP
    replied
    Re: highest p3 clock speed?

    i815 was being rather a turd, for the graphics having missing support and having to drop it to 16 bpp for 3D, which is still a ton better than 16-colors. (4 bpp)

    Color chart:

    16 colors= 4 bpp (The lowest on VGA)

    256 colors

    High color= 16 bpp (Setting the palette to this may increase FPS on later graphics cards (2003 and later)

    True color= 24 bpp

    True color= 32 bpp (usually) (The maximum amount of colors)
    Last edited by RJARRRPCGP; 04-12-2014, 12:48 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • RJARRRPCGP
    replied
    Re: highest p3 clock speed?

    Originally posted by linuxguru
    There are legit, factory-spec 300 MHz mobile Pentiums w/ MMX (I think Tillamook core). AFAIK, the only ones delivered were for an IBM ThinkPad model which was cancelled and replaced by a PII-based model.
    It was likely cancelled, because of TDP issues. It would make better sense on a desktop. If Intel could tweak the transistors and silicon enough to keep a lower wattage while raising the clock on the PI, then it could have been a perfect stop gap, especially for socket 7 boards.
    Last edited by RJARRRPCGP; 04-12-2014, 12:38 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • momaka
    replied
    Re: highest p3 clock speed?

    Originally posted by Heihachi_73
    I believe its 3D (D3D/OGL) modes were limited to 16-bit color anyway, although DirectDraw ran fine in 24-bit, when games actually supported it.
    Wait, you ran a game in D3D/OGL on that piece of turd?!? I'm actually surprised. The last time I tried to game on that computer was about 3 years ago, and I only did it as a joke - besically I tried installing Counter Strike 1.6 (which is essentially 1.5 with Steam). Coundn't get any of the graphics modes to run excep Software Render - and we all know how badly this drops the performance in the game. I think my average framerate was around 12 to 13 FPS, peaking to 15 at times.... on a game from '98.
    ...
    Yep, the i810 is crap for games. But for desktop 2D, is not too bad at all. I can barely see much difference in its 24-bit mode over a computer with a proper 32-bit mode. Most LCD monitors mask that pretty well, especially ones with cheap panels like ChiMei.

    Leave a comment:


  • Heihachi_73
    replied
    Re: highest p3 clock speed?

    Originally posted by momaka
    My P3 HP Pavilion uses the i810 chipset and onboard graphics. It has acceptable 2D window-rendering performance even at 1280x1024. The RageXL... every time I open or close a window, it's like watching a large image download on a slow dial-up connection.
    I know this is from almost two years ago, but the i810 was nothing but a sack of sh!t - what was Intel thinking when they came up with a video chipset which cannot handle 32-bit graphics modes, the standard desktop color depth since the mid-1990s?

    My HP Pavilion 500a (1.2GHz Celeron Tualatin, 256MB SDRAM and a crappy SFF Bestec PSU) suffered from the same thing: i810 chipset, four PCI slots (no AGP) and about three games on the entire planet which worked with its 24-bit graphics mode, unless you wanted to drop the colors to 16-bit and make it look like crap - most games simply crashed on load if the colors weren't 32-bit or 16-bit! I believe its 3D (D3D/OGL) modes were limited to 16-bit color anyway, although DirectDraw ran fine in 24-bit, when games actually supported it. The last time I saw a 24-bit graphics mode in Windows was with an S3 ViRGE on a Pentium 166, that says something (ironically, the older S3 Trio64 series actually ran in 32-bit under Windows' S3 driver).

    Leave a comment:


  • RJARRRPCGP
    replied
    Re: highest p3 clock speed?

    Originally posted by bigbeark

    I have a TUSL-C Asus board that allows me to select a CPU speed, but it overclocks the PCI bus and renders my SCSI cards inoperable.
    Just posting FYI, that's the same reason Via chipsets get a bad rep, because of always being linked to the PCI and AGP buses.

    There seemed to be nothing wrong with them other than that, except for pre-KT266 chipsets.

    Via is known for chipsets that make overclockers say or type profanities...
    Last edited by RJARRRPCGP; 03-16-2014, 05:11 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • linuxguru
    replied
    Re: highest p3 clock speed?

    Originally posted by Th3_uN1Qu3
    I had the 300MHz Pentium I
    There are legit, factory-spec 300 MHz mobile Pentiums w/ MMX (I think Tillamook core). AFAIK, the only ones delivered were for an IBM ThinkPad model which was cancelled and replaced by a PII-based model.

    However, I have one of those 300 MHz Tillamook modules, bought as a souvenir when they showed up in surplus. No way to use it because it has special dual-row connectors on the module, which will only mate to the ones on the cancelled ThinkPad.

    Leave a comment:


  • linuxguru
    replied
    Re: highest p3 clock speed?

    Originally posted by PCBONEZ
    Only after the Northwood clock speeds exceeded about 2GHz.

    'Who wins the race' is largely application dependent.
    If you put a 2GHz Northwood up against a single 1.4GHz PIII-S it's 50/50/90 who will come out on top.

    Intel deliberately suppressed their marketing of PIII-S chips because they kicked butt on their 'Flagship' P4's.
    Presumably that is also why they limited the i815 chipset to 512MB RAM and didn't sh*t a better chipset - even for their own PIII-S server boards.
    Most PIII mobos were SDRAM-only (there may have been a few server mobos that supported DDR). If you want to compare a PIII clock-to-clock with a P4, you have to put the P4 in an SDRAM mobo (of which there were many early ones based on SiS as well as Intel chipsets).

    I've done exactly that many years ago, and I can confirm that on real benchmarks, a 1.2 GHz Tualatin Celeron runs about exactly on par with a 2.66 GHz single-threaded Northwood P4, both with SDRAM. Note that the P4 has 512k cache, while the Tualatin is at 256k.

    I also have a specially-modded i815T board with 8x 3300uF/6.3 on Vcore and some other polymer mods, and I can run almost any Tualatin 1.2 GHz at 1.6 GHz with 133 FSB on that board. That combo basically creams 3 GHz Northwoods with SDRAM. I would in fact prefer a 1.2GHz/100FSB Tualatin Celeron over the 1.2 GHz/133FSB Tualatin PIII (not the 512K cache PIII-S), mainly for the overclock margin with the Celeron.

    Of course, everybody will chime in that Northwoods with DDR will leave Tualatins in the dust. Fine, but if I had to use DDR, I would use a Thoroughbred-B Athlon XP3000+ or higher to cream any Northwood or Prescott.

    Basically, Netburst was junk, but Intel made a lot of money on it. Luckily, I didn't waste too much money on P4s, and my last one will get an upgrade shortly.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pentium4
    replied
    Re: highest p3 clock speed?

    I might be willing to sell my dual P3 setup just cause I have no time to mess with it it's a Supermicro board with dual 1.4GHz Tualitin-S P3's with 4GB of ECC Crucial PC133 memory

    Leave a comment:


  • goodpsusearch
    replied
    Re: highest p3 clock speed?

    Originally posted by momaka
    I got an ASUS CUR-DLS motherboard with 2x 1GHz Pentium 3s in it. With a GeForce 6200 128 MB PCI video card, I get about the same gaming performance as I do with a 2 GHz Northwood P4 system with a 128 MB GeForce 5600FX. YouTube performance is about the same too. The P3s suck at video decoding, though. This is probably the only place where the long architecture of the P4 shines.


    Yup, that's the exact same reason I have the GeForce 6200 in mine. The 8 MB RageXL is so slow that it makes me rage!


    I disagree.
    Both are very sad in terms of performance. However, the Intel i815 at least doesn't have problems rendering Windows GUI screens in 1024x768, unlike the RageXL. My P3 HP Pavilion uses the i810 chipset and onboard graphics. It has acceptable 2D window-rendering performance even at 1280x1024. The RageXL... every time I open or close a window, it's like watching a large image download on a slow dial-up connection.
    I have a Pentium 3 Tualatin Celeron 1300 @ 1456MHZ overclocking, 768MB SDRAM and ALL IN WONDER RAGE 128 PRO 32MB. While the TV Tuner is very satisfying, the card is slow on Windows XP, for example when the mouse moves to "All the programs" in start menu, the showing of the submenu is laggish.

    Leave a comment:


  • RJARRRPCGP
    replied
    Re: highest p3 clock speed?

    i815 seems to be missing blending functions.

    Definitely has a fog issue. Had to disable fog with PJ64 1x, when I made the PIII 733 box a Wintendo.

    Expect squares from time to time, because i815 appears to be missing blending functions that most GPUs had, even then.

    And Intel drivers are stable. I do agree that I never had desktop rendering issues.

    i815 is what gave Intel graphics a bad rep.

    Leave a comment:


  • momaka
    replied
    Re: highest p3 clock speed?

    I got an ASUS CUR-DLS motherboard with 2x 1GHz Pentium 3s in it. With a GeForce 6200 128 MB PCI video card, I get about the same gaming performance as I do with a 2 GHz Northwood P4 system with a 128 MB GeForce 5600FX. YouTube performance is about the same too. The P3s suck at video decoding, though. This is probably the only place where the long architecture of the P4 shines.

    Originally posted by Logistics
    and an aftermarket PCI video card because I just cannot stand the RageXL sadness.
    Yup, that's the exact same reason I have the GeForce 6200 in mine. The 8 MB RageXL is so slow that it makes me rage!

    Originally posted by RJARRRPCGP
    At least the RageXL is better than an Intel i815!
    I disagree.
    Both are very sad in terms of performance. However, the Intel i815 at least doesn't have problems rendering Windows GUI screens in 1024x768, unlike the RageXL. My P3 HP Pavilion uses the i810 chipset and onboard graphics. It has acceptable 2D window-rendering performance even at 1280x1024. The RageXL... every time I open or close a window, it's like watching a large image download on a slow dial-up connection.

    Leave a comment:


  • Uranium-235
    replied
    Re: highest p3 clock speed?

    I have a 1U supermicro server /w dual P3-S 1.4's. DDR (ECC/reg). serverworks chipset. no overclocking options :/

    Leave a comment:


  • kc8adu
    replied
    Re: highest p3 clock speed?

    well i might try and hotrod another dual p3.
    got in a junker with a dual 370 board and cpu's.
    needs caps.
    has isa!
    will post results here.

    Leave a comment:


  • larrymoencurly
    replied
    Re: highest p3 clock speed?

    Originally posted by shovenose
    is it true that a 1.6ghz p3 would blow away a 1.6ghz p4?
    On the Passmark benchmark, a 1.4 GHz PIII scored 336, a 1.6 GHz P4 scored 193.

    http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu_list.php

    Leave a comment:


  • RJARRRPCGP
    replied
    Re: highest p3 clock speed?

    Originally posted by Logistics
    an aftermarket PCI video card because I just cannot stand the RageXL sadness.
    At least the RageXL is better than an Intel i815!

    The 82815 I used on a PIII 733 was real sad!

    Especially because 82815s have serious blending issues. (Likely alpha-blending issues)

    RageXL was just bloody slow when I tested one with Perfect Dark on my Wintendo.
    Last edited by RJARRRPCGP; 12-05-2012, 02:11 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Logistics
    replied
    Re: highest p3 clock speed?

    This is very interesting, but my P3 boards are dually tually's with ServerWorks chipsets so I don't think I can raise them over 133 to begin with. I need to go back and service them with a HD alignment and XP SP3 to see how they do... and an aftermarket PCI video card because I just cannot stand the RageXL sadness.

    Leave a comment:


  • TELVM
    replied
    Re: highest p3 clock speed?

    Originally posted by shovenose
    is it true that a 1.6ghz p3 would blow away a 1.6ghz p4?
    And even a 2.8 P4 in some tasks:

    Leave a comment:


  • Thzar
    replied
    Re: highest p3 clock speed?

    Tualatin 1300@1733 Mhz on Asus CUSL2-M.

    With a standard 220W psu.

    Leave a comment:

Related Topics

Collapse

  • shelby5041
    clock radio / radio lifespan?
    by shelby5041
    hi
    ive got a modern digital clock radio approx 15yrs old

    my question is how long can a clock radio or a simple radio last ss farcas operating hours?

    since elec components have limited hour lifecspan i would imagine the radio or clock radio would eventually fail.

    the reason i ask is because i have my clock radio on radio function 24/7 for the past 7 years and its still working fine....i leave the radio on ..never turn off past 7years...thats approx 60000 hours

    it uses very little power just a few watts i would imagine that may have something...
    09-14-2024, 03:30 AM
  • klugec
    KVA2 RTX 2060 Super 8GB Desktop artifacts
    by klugec
    Hello (sorry for my bad English),

    I have a strange problem with my KVA2 RTX 2060 Super. As soon as Windows 11 is loaded, artifacts appear. Now the crazy thing: When I start Furmark the artifacts are gone and Furmark runs great without crashing. Mats test shows me no errors (PASS). Drivers can also be loaded without any problems.


    Mods shows me the following error:

    Code:
    MODS start: Thu Feb  1 19:16:00 2024
    
    Command Line : gputest.js -oqa -old_gold -test 94 -dramclk_percent 100 -ignore_fatal_errors -run_on_error -fan_speed 70 -matsinfo
    ...
    02-01-2024, 10:58 PM
  • UserXP
    Vintage SONY Digital Clock Radio ICF-C12W no audio
    by UserXP
    Dear all,

    I have this old radio clock by Sony from the early 80s, I guess. The clock display works, but is dim, the function board appears to be OK - but the radio unit shows no signs of life. It doesn't produce a single noise, crack or anything from either FM or AM band. It's like it doesn't even power up.
    i opened the radio and it is full of some TRACON gray capacitors. They only have their negative strip printed, voltage and capacitace markings - no series, no temperature marking, nothing else.
    My question is, do you know of this brand of capacitors and how bad are...
    07-21-2025, 08:35 AM
  • Babbar
    1980s Holz Her 2420 belt sander - Only works when speed control at maximum
    by Babbar
    My fathers belt sander from the 80s which i very much would like to continue using has an issue with the speed control. The machine works fine on maximum speed but will not turn or give any sign of life when on any other setting. The speed control is a dial going from 1-6 although implemented as a potentiometer without distinct steps. I took the machine apart and measured each component individually, all components and measurements have been captioned in the attached pictures. The Triac did not get identified correctly using my cheapo component tester, i don't know if this is user error, if the...
    11-13-2024, 01:54 AM
  • Document Archive
    AD7276, AD7277, AD7278, AD7274, AD7273​ Datasheet
    by Document Archive
    AD7276, AD7277, AD7278, AD7274, AD7273

    The AD7276, AD7277, AD7278, AD7274, AD7273 are 12-bit/10-bit/8-bit, high speed, low power, successive approximation analog-to-digital converters (ADCs), respectively. The parts operate from a single 2.35V to 3.6V power supply and feature throughput rates of up to 3 MSPS. The parts contain a low noise, wide bandwidth track-and-hold amplifier that can handle input frequencies in excess of 55 MHz.

    The conversion process and data acquisition are controlled using CS and the serial clock, allowing the devices to interface with microprocessors...
    10-07-2024, 05:32 AM
  • Loading...
  • No more items.
Working...