Here's the deal.
I don't trust new hard drives, nor do I have much of a need for them personally. As a result I end up with old hard drives, which are usually more robust and last much longer.
Unfortunately, even the old hard drives aren't without their problems. This one is a case in point. It's an ST380011A, made in 2004. I looked at the connector attachment points, and what did I see but tin whiskers. I compared it with an ST360021A (leaded solder) and ST3250820A (lead-free) and the solder certainly looks like that on the latter.
The real kicker is that by no means were they forced to use lead-free solder in 2004. I have power supplies from 2005, even early 2006 which don't have that crap.
The drive was functioning okay the last time I used it, but I doubt it's a good idea to keep using it like this.
And this time the goes to Seagate instead of RoHS, as I already explained.
EDIT: And for the record, there's nothing else wrong with the drive. If the solder becomes the first point of failure, well that sucks.
I don't trust new hard drives, nor do I have much of a need for them personally. As a result I end up with old hard drives, which are usually more robust and last much longer.
Unfortunately, even the old hard drives aren't without their problems. This one is a case in point. It's an ST380011A, made in 2004. I looked at the connector attachment points, and what did I see but tin whiskers. I compared it with an ST360021A (leaded solder) and ST3250820A (lead-free) and the solder certainly looks like that on the latter.
The real kicker is that by no means were they forced to use lead-free solder in 2004. I have power supplies from 2005, even early 2006 which don't have that crap.
The drive was functioning okay the last time I used it, but I doubt it's a good idea to keep using it like this.
And this time the goes to Seagate instead of RoHS, as I already explained.
EDIT: And for the record, there's nothing else wrong with the drive. If the solder becomes the first point of failure, well that sucks.
Comment