Re: Testing VRMs
Yes. *Possibly*
Is this for the A7S333 motherboard from your other thread? Or a different motherboard?
That's because of the low resistance of the circuit. It will make your meter think it is filling up a big cap.
That's why it's never reliable to measure anything in circuit, especially if you don't understand the circuit well.
Yes, do that.
This is by far the best way to isolate a short-circuit: keep removing parts until the short-circuit is gone. Unfortunately, this is also the hardest way. But the reward is the certainty you get.
Yes. *Possibly*
Is this for the A7S333 motherboard from your other thread? Or a different motherboard?
That's because of the low resistance of the circuit. It will make your meter think it is filling up a big cap.
That's why it's never reliable to measure anything in circuit, especially if you don't understand the circuit well.
Yes, do that.
This is by far the best way to isolate a short-circuit: keep removing parts until the short-circuit is gone. Unfortunately, this is also the hardest way. But the reward is the certainty you get.
) and occasionally the NB on a few motherboards. The fact that bianchi77 got a low-resistance after removing the CPU strongly suggests that the NB is powered from the CPU VRM as well. I'm not saying that it can't be shorted ceramic capacitors, but it seems unlikely to me in this case, since the motherboard does turn ON for a few seconds. If any shorted ceramic capacitor was to take that much energy from the CPU VRM for a few seconds, it would have burned for sure.
Comment