Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules *ALL NEW MEMBERS, PLEASE READ!! UPDATED!!*

First and foremost, Welcome to the Badcaps Capacitor Search Engine & Forums!

New members that have activated their accounts have limited access to certain features of the site until established. Members with zero posts have no access to the private messaging system. Also, members with zero posts may not edit certain profile attributes, such as signatures. New members also may not create new threads. However, new members with zero posts have full access to all technical information contained on this forum, and that also includes attachments (images and files that other members have uploaded), and new members that have activated their accounts are free to post replies to existing threads. If you wish to create a new thread, the fix is simple! All you need is ONE post to be able to have full unrestricted access, and that can be simply posting an introduction of yourself or say hello in THIS THREAD. This may seem a little strange, but it helps keep spam and abuse curved. Please note, that it may take up to one hour from your first post for the limits to be removed. If you make a post and don't immediately see the restrictions gone, be patient. The promotion system updates every hour.

Please complete your profile after making your first post, with your name, locale, and other info. It's nice to know members on a first name basis, and know where they're from. Makes for a much friendlier environment!

Posting rules for this forum will be STRICTLY enforced by myself as the owner/administrator, and my moderator crew.

Badcaps.net IS A BUSINESS!!! If you are a servicer, service center, or vendor of any kind in the computer/capacitor industry, you are NOT permitted to advertise, link, promote, or plug your business on this forum in ANY way! NO EXCEPTIONS!! This includes asking for "donations" in exchange for BIOS passwords or tech advice for anything! If I see you doing that, your post will be edited or deleted, and you warned. If it happens again, you will be banned. The only exceptions are the references to the companies quoted in the FAQ which the administration have added for the convenience of those around the world who have difficulty to source caps for their repair.

This also includes using this forum's private message system to solicit business. Members, if you receive a PM from anyone offering repair services or components, please alert me immediately! Myself or any of my moderators, will never private message a user soliciting business, for Badcaps.net, or any other servicer/vendor. If you PM me about repairing your device, I will reply and take care of you, however, I will not message you first.

------------------------------------

Posting rules:

This forum was created to be a technical support forum primarily for the do-it-yourselfers who choose to repair their own boards. Any and all technical questions are welcome!

1) Please use the SEARCH feature!! Your question may have been answered in another thread! Please search first and see if it has!

2) When posting a technical question, be as detailed as possible in your thread. The more information we have about your specific problem, the better we can answer your question.

3) Please use COMPLETE sentences, punctuation, and grammar! Nobody is perfect, hence, a spelling error on occasion is no biggie. However, posts/threads that are unreadable will be deleted. This includes any and all forms of 'ebonics', leet, chatroom jargon, and 'text message' shorthand and slang. This forum is not a chatroom/text message, please use full words and complete sentences.

4) Keep discussion on topic!! DO NOT HIJACK THREADS! It's easy to do (I've done it myself a few times...) Lets try to keep it down to a minimal!! If you have something really off topic, that's what the lounge is for!

5) Keep things civil! There will be no tolerance for flaming, bashing, hateful remarks, racial remarks, adult material of ANY kind, and so on.

6) THE LOUNGE RULES! The lounge is a place for off topic chit-chat! If you post something that might be considered questionable or something you don't want kids to see, or something you can't view at work/school, etc, please label that thread *NWS* or NOT WORK SAFE in the thread title as a warning. The Lounge is NOT moderated, anything is welcome... Feel free to post rants, jokes, cars, hot women (remember the NWS warning in the title), or just about anything within reason. It's an open forum! Please refrain from participating in political topics if you have thin skin, they can get heated sometimes!! Remember that we have members here from all over the world, with many different views and cultures. Political debates can turn really ugly, and really fast, and if they degrade to personal attacks and useless banter/bashing, moderator action will ensue. I want this forum to be a safe haven for technical discussions from all walks of life, so lets keep off topic discussions civil and friendly.

7) Spamming and spammers will NOT be tolerated or accepted in any way, shape, or form! Spam bots are instantly and permanently banned, and their threads deleted! The mod crew is really quick to zap spammers, we typically pop them before they even get to post. This also includes regular members as well. be courteous and not post spam. This includes links to off-site information that's not relevant to the thread at hand. Do not plug other websites, forums, or businesses in your signatures. You may do so in a thread if the off-site link you're posting is relevant to the topic, but otherwise, don't do it. If you see a thread which clearly a spam bot posting that we have not removed yet, DO NOT click any links in it!! Simply click the 'report bad post' button, and it'll be taken care of, usually within minutes.

8) Account removals & closures: Since no personal information is given in the creation of your Badcaps.net Forum account, requests to remove and/or delete accounts will be declined. Any requests for removal of threads & posts you created will also be declined. The reason is the missing posts can/will leave threads incomplete and fragmented. For the threads to be of help to others later on, information can't and won't be missing. However, if you inadvertently posted personal identifiable information in a post (such as an email address, real name, or phone number), please contact a staff member. In those cases, the post may be edited or removed, at the staff members discretion.

That's about it for the rules, the setup here is pretty loose. However, if you're caught violating any of the rules above, here's what will happen:

First offense: Warning by me or a moderator
Second offense: Banning for 1 day
Third offense: Banning for 3 days
Fourth offense: Banned permanently.

If you do something really dumb, or are just a troll, I will skip the warning and the temporary banning, and ban you permanently!

The rules are pretty cut and dry... However, if you have any questions about this policy, feel free to contact me.
See more
See less

KDMPower MIPC MI-X8775CD [PCB WF-C rev:E]

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    KDMPower MIPC MI-X8775CD [PCB WF-C rev:E]

    Remember that cheap $15 PSU that dmill89 posted a while back here?
    Technical discussion for power supplies. This covers PC supplies, and any other related power supply issue. When starting a new thread, please put the make AND model of your device in the thread title. Also be VERY descriptive of your issue, that way you'll get the best answer possible!

    .
    .
    So I was randomly browsing on eBay (as always) and saw a listing for supposedly the same “775 Watt” PSU with starting bid at $1. Description stated “for part or repair”, with the owner/seller mentioning the PSU had blown/shorted. Surely I could spend a few $$ more and get the same PSU as dmill89 right from Amazon brand new and (probably) working… but where is the fun in that?!

    So I got this one instead for $13 shipped to my door ($0.99 for the PSU and the rest was shipping. ) If dmill’s PSU was able to handle 350 Watts without croaking, it really made me wonder what was wrong with this one. I got the unit nicely packed, and it honestly looked pretty much unused with no dust anywhere:


    On the outside, it appears nearly the same as dmill89’s PSU: standard black finish, non-modular unit with a 120 mm fan and voltage selector switch (i.e. no AFPC.) Only difference was really that mine appeared to have a see-through fan with LEDs.

    And here is a bottom-shot:

    I think one way to tell if you’re dealing with a cheap PSU is when you see those stamped PCB stand-offs on the case. On the positive side, at least there are vents on the back of the PSU to (hopefully) avoid hot spots.

    Here are also all of the connectors this PSU has:

    Aside from the standard motherboard stuff (20+4 pin ATX, 4+4 pin 12V CPU power), this unit also has 2x 6+2 pin PCI-E 12V power, 6x SATA, 3x Molex, and 1x floppy/Berg. The output wires are a mix of 18 and 20 AWG, with the ATX connector, 4+4 pin 12V CPU, and first 6+2 pin PCI-E connector being 18 AWG. The 2nd 6+2 pin PCI-E is simply piggy-backed from the 1st one, but with 20 AWG wire. The Molex and SATA connectors are also all 20 AWG. I do like how they arranged the drive connectors though, with 2x SATA followed by a single Molex on each string. And all wires are UL listed, at least.

    OK, let’s have a look at the label finally.

    It appears like this is not the same PSU model as dmill’s. Whereas his was an MI-08775V2 and rated for 875 Watts, this one is a MI-X8775CD and *only* rated for 775 Watts… like we are going to believe that one, too. What’s funny is that label keeps peeling off by itself. While I was taking the case shots above, I had to re-apply pressure on it at least several times to stop it from rolling onto itself and falling off. It’s as if it knew it was telling me lies and so was shamefully trying to cover itself, fall off, and hide somewhere.

    On a different note, I’m surprised the shipping box didn’t get blown away by the wind when the unit was delivered to my house. There’s not much weight to this PSU. Probably a good half of it is from the output cables. On the other hand, all those output cables scare me - imagine someone trying to plug in a beefy video card with two 8-pin PCI-E power connectors! Technically speaking, since there are supposedly two 12V rails rated at 24 Amps each and no mention of the total max combined current, one could assume this unit is capable of 48 Amps (or 576 Watts) on the 12V rail. But maybe that is possible on this unit, after all. What do I know if I haven’t opened the unit yet? I suppose that part comes next.

    But first, would it B OK if I posted a picture of the fan? (Oh look at me trying to be funny now. )

    This one is a rated for 0.12 Amps - just a tad lower than the one in dmill’s PSU. When I hooked it on 12V directly, it does move quite a bit of air, though. And the blue LEDs are very bright and pretty. (Perhaps that also explains the lower rated power of the PSU - those LEDs need a lot of juice, so they had to lower the rating on the unit. )

    Anyways, here is the unit inside.


    Right off the bat we can see… well, there isn’t a whole lot to see, really. Initially, I thought this might be a 300-350 Watt capable unit. Sure the input filtering is missing, but I expect that to a degree in any cheap PSU. What really got me, though… before I had the unit opened and was looking through the vents, I was honestly very excited, because I could see two TO-3P transistors on the primary heatsink and a PDIP-16 chip on the secondary. This got me thinking the PSU must use the same double-forward design as the 875W unit, but perhaps also with added OCP (due to that PDIP-16 IC.) Then after opening the unit, I looked at the parts on the primary heatsink and noted the “13009” text on what I thought was one of the MOSFETs. Surely this quickly extinguished my excitement.
    - That ain’t no MOSFET! That’s a BJT.
    And only then I saw the obvious - that there are 3 transformers in the middle. The realization hit me like a rock on the head… this is yet just another half-bridge PSU. Looking up info on the SDC2921 PWM controller confirms this 100%.

    Ah well, at least the thing has a bridge rectifier and a properly-sized (tall) 35 mm main transformer. The heatsinks are also not bad. Certainly we can’t expect 775 Watts from that. Heck, does a half-bridge design over 500 Watts even exist as far as ATX PSUs go? If yes, I don’t want to know how much one of those weights or what kind of BJTs it has on the primary. It certainly won’t be anything like you see in the pictures above. But anyways, let’s continue forward.

    I think I see what blew up in there.

    Interestingly enough, the fuse (a free e-cookie for anyone that can find it ) was intact. I suppose this part (and perhaps others) blew up to save the fuse, as usual. 5VSB should still be good, though. It uses a 3313D IC (whatever that is, I can’t seem to located a datasheet) and has the typical 50V, 47 uF “startup” cap.

    Time for an autopsy on the primary, so out goes the heatsink.

    We have not one but two charred small “components”. Initially, I thought these were diodes, but the PCB silkscreen suggests they are resistors. I get quite different readings for the two, despite both being connected the same way. Next to these, you may also see two small 1-Ohm resistors (one in front of Q15, and the other to the right of Q16 Base) - these are blown open. One even appears to have a hole / burn mark on it. The reverse-polarity diodes might be OK, though. Will check if/when I decide to dig deeper into it.

    Next, here’s our beloved MOSFETs…. Oops sorry, I meant BJTs.

    They look OK, but they are NOT OK. The left one is completely blown open on all pins. The right one has a short between Base and Collector. The Emitter has decided it won’t talk to these two in any way - completely open in any direction. Given the no-name manufacturer (or at least I can’t seem to find it), no telling if these are knock-offs or real 13009. I suspect it may be the former. In any case, the MIGHTY fuse defeated them.

    Speaking of which, I think this picture just barely shows the fuse… among other parts.

    For the primary caps, we get a pair of CapXon LP, 200V, 820 uF… in 22x42 mm size. IMO, that is suspiciously small for that capacity. I shall find out later. Also interesting to note there is a 2nd spot for a thermistor (which is bridge by a jumper, since there is one already) as well as an empty spot for a connector for PPFC coil. As for the blue cap on the left of the CapXon’s: that should be a Y2-class cap between ground (earth) and negative (-) primary-side bus… but surely enough, it ain’t Y2-rated and rather just a standard 2.2 nF, 2 kV ceramic cap. In terms of EMI/RFI, this PSU certainly won’t pass… and hence why we don’t see any FCC or UL marks on the label.

    On the other hand, the PCB doesn't seem so bad, at least on the solder side:

    The soldering is very good, overall. Spacing between primary and secondary might be a bit questionable in a few places... but overall, nothing too serious, it seems.

    continued in part 2 below due to 10k char limit...
    Attached Files
    Last edited by momaka; 11-17-2020, 12:23 AM.

    #2
    KDMPower MIPC MI-X8775CD [PCB WF-C rev:E] - part 2

    Of course, who cares about safety, so long as this PSU can do 775 Watts, right?
    Well, can it? Let’s look at the secondary side.

    We get one STPS2045CT rectifier for 3.3V and same for 5V rail. Meanwhile, the 12V rail gets 2x MBR20100CT in parallel. So the label is a complete LIE in terms of the current capabilities on each rail (but I think we expected that already. ) On the other hand, this is probably one of the few cheapo PSUs that I’ve seen with much better rectifier configuration on the 12V rail than the 5V rail. But that also means the 5V and 12V rectifiers are not tied together in any way, so I suspect this PSU probably does not have good cross-regulation.

    The windings for the 5V rail on the main output toroid inductor sign a similar tune. In the past, most half-bridge PSUs would typically get 2x thick wires for the 5V rail and a single wire for the 12V rail. In this unit, both the 5V and 12V rail appear to have the same wire thickness on the output toroid… and it’s not very thick, mind you. :\ IMO, it won’t be able carry even 24-25 Amps… let alone the current of “dual” 24-Amp 12V rails. The output toroid core is also the lower-tier Micrometals-52 and hence is going to be a little more loss-y. Thus, I expect this PSU probably had mediocre efficiency. And with all of that said and shown above, I don’t think this PSU is realistically capable of more than 250 Watts continuous DC due to those output toroids. Maybe it can peak at 300 Watts, but maybe not. I wouldn’t suggest anyone who has one of these to push it that far. And even if the output toroid was bigger, we also have to account for the output ripple, which is where the output electrolytic caps come into play.

    On that front, I think it’s clear this unit won’t do too well there either. Each rail has only 2x 1000 uF caps (though at least the cap spots are for 10 mm diameter.) There are also PI coils for each rail - yes those tiny ones. The -12V rail gets none, though. It only has a single 470 uF cap. Meanwhile, the 5VSB has a 16V, 1000 uF cap and a 10V, 470 uF cap. All output caps are by HANGCON… or is it KANGCON? You tell me.

    OK, maybe that picture didn’t come out too well. But either way, those output caps probably won’t allow for more than 150 Watts total before the ripple goes out of spec. As a side note, we can see on the above picture the caps are dated early 2019 (3rd week, I presume?) So this PSU is, at most, maybe almost 2 years old. Judging by the lack of dust, though, I don’t think it has seen much (if any?) use. In fact, it still has that “new China smell” to it. I suspect this may even be on of those cases where the user just built a new system with this PSU, powered it On, and the thing blew up almost instantly or in very short order.

    Another interesting thing I find is that the SDC2921 PWM IC datasheet says the IC can be configured to provide OPP. Tracing my unit, I spotted an arrow mark on the PCB silkscreen pointing to three resistors labeled “OPP” (and the resistors are installed.) Now, whether or not it was done properly, that’s another question. Perhaps it was, and maybe the primary blew because those 13009 BJTs were dodgy. Or maybe the Base drive circuit was not built with good enough parts. Or maybe the OPP is incorrectly set to sky-high levels.

    Whichever the case, now I have me another PSU to repair… or should I?
    Part of me does NOT want to, because I have one nice Enermax PSU that’s awaiting an ATX wire harness. On the other hand, these cheapo H-bridge PSUs are usually super easy to repair. In fact, if there is one good thing about this PSU, it’s how easy it is to find components and work on. A lot of functions are even labeled on the PCB with text. Probably a great PSU for anyone that wants to learn how to repair/troubleshoot electronics.

    I guess I’ll sleep on it for a while and then decide what I shall do with it. Knowing me, I most likely will end up fixing it with parts from “lesser” PSUs (I’m looking at you Raidmax RX-380K!) But we will see. Don’t stay tuned for this one - it will likely go in the back of the queue on my list of projects.
    Attached Files
    Last edited by momaka; 11-17-2020, 12:26 AM.

    Comment


      #3
      Re: KDMPower MIPC MI-X8775CD [PCB WF-C rev:E]

      Originally posted by momaka View Post
      Interestingly enough, the fuse (a free e-cookie for anyone that can find it ) was intact. I suppose this part (and perhaps others) blew up to save the fuse, as usual.
      I saw it in this photo, do I get the cookie?
      Judging by this better view of the fuse I'm not sure if I would rate it as a fuse or more a wire link?
      "The one who says it cannot be done should never interrupt the one who is doing it."

      Comment


        #4
        Re: KDMPower MIPC MI-X8775CD [PCB WF-C rev:E]

        Originally posted by Per Hansson View Post
        I saw it in this photo, do I get the cookie?
        And we have a winner!
        (Then again, it appears you were also the only participant in that game. )

        Originally posted by Per Hansson View Post
        Judging by this better view of the fuse I'm not sure if I would rate it as a fuse or more a wire link?
        Why not both?

        Well, it is a legit fuse, after all. But it's one of those small, short ones. Yes, it's rated for 250V, but it's a glass fuse and not heatshrinked. So I imagine there is a chance that it could arc-over in the case of a hard short-circuit. Then again, if the BJTs blew open before it did... lol!

        Also, another thing I noticed today (though I forgot to take a picture): on the secondary side next to the 12V wires, there is silkscreen "12V1" and "12V2" that points with arrows how the supposedly "dual" 12V rails should be connected. But looking underneath on the PCB, there are no separate traces for two 12V rails. It's all coming from one copper trace. So this PSU was never even capable of having dual rails to begin with by design.

        On that note, if I do end up fixing this, I will probably remove one of the 20 Amp rectifiers from the 12V rail to use in another PSU. A single 20 Amp rectifier on the 12V rail should still be more than enough. But anyways, those are all just "rough ideas" for this PSU. First I'm going to try finish fixing up my better PSUs. Finished recapping two HiPro's this week and have an old Delta, FSP, and Bestec lining up in the queue. Maybe even a cool Topower/Zumax I posted a while back.
        Last edited by momaka; 11-20-2020, 11:28 PM.

        Comment


          #5
          Re: KDMPower MIPC MI-X8775CD [PCB WF-C rev:E]

          Ahh yes of course I forgot, the fuse is for a 875w PSU with half-bridge design of around 70% efficiency so of course that explains the thick wire inside it

          But can you explain one thing for me, you say this is a half-bridge design but that it uses 13009 BJT transistors for the half-bridge.
          The design examples I found when I Google show the half-bridge topology using two MOSFET switches.
          Is it just a misnomer for ATX power supplies or what is up with that?
          "The one who says it cannot be done should never interrupt the one who is doing it."

          Comment


            #6
            Re: KDMPower MIPC MI-X8775CD [PCB WF-C rev:E]

            Originally posted by momaka View Post

            What's funny is that label keeps peeling off by itself. While I was taking the case shots above, I had to re-apply pressure on it at least several times to stop it from rolling onto itself and falling off. It's as if it knew it was telling me lies and so was shamefully trying to cover itself, fall off, and hide somewhere.
            [/SIZE]
            They didn't even put good quality glue on the back of the label!



            Now, seriously, I am impressed. This psu is so much better than those Hantol/Powertech/t&p that I posted some months ago.

            It even has proper 35 transformer, primaries that I hope they would at least be 560uF real C and secondary side with proper output filtering on the main voltages. I mean it even has coils!

            These are the psus I really like to play with. I would add input filter, check primary caps, try to fix the psu problem and replace all secondary capacitors with 2200uF caps. And 5vsb always gets 2x1000uF japanese low esr caps to be safe.

            And then play with the fan controller.


            Originally posted by momaka View Post
            On that note, if I do end up fixing this, I will probably remove one of the 20 Amp rectifiers from the 12V rail to use in another PSU. A single 20 Amp rectifier on the 12V rail should still be more than enough. But anyways, those are all just "rough ideas" for this PSU.
            Nooo!

            Having enough headroom on the secondary side actually helps a lot with the efficiency and the total power the psu can handle. It also helps tuning the fan to be slower and quieter.

            Comment


              #7
              Re: KDMPower MIPC MI-X8775CD [PCB WF-C rev:E]

              Originally posted by Per Hansson View Post
              But can you explain one thing for me, you say this is a half-bridge design but that it uses 13009 BJT transistors for the half-bridge.
              The design examples I found when I Google show the half-bridge topology using two MOSFET switches.
              Is it just a misnomer for ATX power supplies or what is up with that?
              Well, you CAN build a half-bridge PSU with MOSFETs too... or probably just about any switching device, if designed accordingly. That goes for other topologies too.

              Here is, for example, one H-bridge PSU posted recently that appears to use MOSFETs:
              If you have a general question concerning basic electronics theory or component function & usage, here's where it goes.


              As to why cheap PSUs continue to use BJTs for half-bridge designs... that I'm not 100% sure about. I suspect it has to do with the fact that the design is well-understood and easy to copy (after all, half-bridge schematics have been widely-available on the internet for a long time now.) I also suspect it has to do with the fact that H-bridge PSUs can be built with readily-available dirt-cheap parts. BJTs from the 1300x family are one of those parts just like LM358, LM317, 555 timer, and etc. - i.e. parts that aren't really the best in what they do, but very simple, cheap, and universal, so too good to go away / get replaced by something new.

              As a result of using these cheaper BJTs, the switching frequency is also typically lower... which works out fine with the rest of the PSU too, because then you don't need very low ESR caps or output toroid rated for higher frequency. On that note...

              Originally posted by momaka
              The output toroid core is also the lower-tier Micrometals-52 and hence is going to be a little more loss-y.
              That should be Micrometals-26 in post #2.
              Micrometals-52 is the better core (slightly higher frequency and permeability specs) - typically colored green with blue on one side.

              Originally posted by goodpsusearch View Post
              They didn't even put good quality glue on the back of the label!
              Actually, it might be the paint on the case that's the problem. It has a very fine eggshell finish, so probably most labels won't stick to it properly.

              On that note, I didn't see a warranty sticker anywhere. Not that I was expecting this PSU to have one anyways.

              Originally posted by goodpsusearch View Post
              Now, seriously, I am impressed. This psu is so much better than those Hantol/Powertech/t&p that I posted some months ago.
              That is true.

              When you put it that way, it does seem like a PSU worth fixing up. And indeed I think I will.

              Looks like it really is time to break apart that Raidmax RX-380K crapjob I liked above and use its parts in better PSUs. The only reason I've been saving it is because it uses the most simplistic H-bridge design with a KA7500 controller and discrete transistors for the protections. A long while back, The_Unique posted a tutorial/writeup how to roughly convert such PSUs to adjustable ones and it's been on my mind to try that for a long time now (but just among many other projects, so that's why I never got to it.)

              Originally posted by goodpsusearch View Post
              These are the psus I really like to play with. I would add input filter, check primary caps, try to fix the psu problem and replace all secondary capacitors with 2200uF caps. And 5vsb always gets 2x1000uF japanese low esr caps to be safe.
              Well, as I've come to find out, getting an input filter for these PSUs is the hardest part - at least the EMI/RFI chokes, that is. Sure I have some scrap TV boards that do have proper EMI/RFI filters... but a lot of times, those don't fit (usually too big.) And getting new filter parts (at least reputable ones) is not exactly cheap (some places ask as much for a filter as this PSU costs. )

              I could get a bunch of these, though, and wind my own chokes since I already have the wire:
              Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for 5X 22mm x 14mm x 8mm Round Green Transformers Toroid Ferrite Cores for Inductors at the best online prices at eBay! Free shipping for many products!


              The other thing is... when it comes to recapping, I'm always low on cap stock by the time I get to my "lesser" PSUs. Main problem is (well, IDK if it's a problem, really ) I've acquired too many good Delta and HiPro PSUs, and those take precedent when it comes to getting recapped. So if by any chance I get any leftover caps, only then the lower-tier PSUs may get recapped.

              Originally posted by goodpsusearch View Post
              And then play with the fan controller.
              I guess I forgot to mention, but this PSU already has one. Not sure how well it works, though. Probably worth looking into, as you noted... once the PSU is fixed.

              Originally posted by goodpsusearch View Post
              Nooo!

              Having enough headroom on the secondary side actually helps a lot with the efficiency and the total power the psu can handle. It also helps tuning the fan to be slower and quieter.
              I know.
              But it won't help too much in this case. The single not-so-thick wire on the main PS output toroid for the 12V rail will very likely start pushing the limits around the 15 Amp mark. At 20 Amps (if the core can even handle that), I suspect it will get very hot. So there's no point in keeping too much headroom on any of the rectifiers if the output toroid wires (nor the core itself) can handle that kind of load.

              The other thing that throws me off is how the primary blew up even with (supposedly) 13009 BJTs. If those are truly 13009 and not cheapo knock-offs, then I expect at least a few components on the secondary (like the toroid inductor) would have seen some heating from the large load the PSU was tasked with. But that doesn't seem to have happened, so I think there is also a possibility there may be something not quite right with the design. The OPP should have also acted before the primary BJTs blew (and it didn't). So for these reasons, I don't see why the secondary should be so over-built, when it really is the primary that's going to be my limit again. I actually rather the secondary side rectifiers go first, as that usually triggers the short-circuit protection and the PSU usually just shuts down. Usually.

              Comment


                #8
                KDMPower MIPC MI-X8775CD [PCB WF-C rev:E] - the autopsy results

                OK, since I do think I am going to end up fixing this PSU... first thing that needs taking care of is the blown components on the primary.

                Before removing anything, though, I decided to draw a rough schematic of the BJT drive circuit. Well, I did that... and perhaps I got a little carried away.


                I just wish I didn't use a scrap piece of paper, as I though this would only be a rough schematic that I could later throw away. Now I don't feel like throwing away this garbage paper (at least until I re-draw / copy it.)

                Basically, the above partial schematic of the PSU contains the BJT drive circuit on the primary, the BJT driver circuit on the secondary, and even the OPP circuit traced out (since it was connected to the BJT drive circuit on the secondary - might as well do that too, right. ) With that said, please don't assume it to be 100% accurate. After scanning it and just as I was ready to upload it here, I already found a mistake (which I corrected in Photoshop.) If something doesn't add up, please feel free to point it out.

                Anyways...
                So what does the autopsy reveal? Well, I wrote that on the schematic paper above, but here it is in text format too:
                - R50 and R52, which were the 1-Ohm resistors, are completely OPEN.
                - R51 measures 1.4x KOhms... but from what I can see, the first band on one side of its color code is Red. So no idea what this is, but the resistance likely doesn't match. Thus, this resistor is bad for sure.
                - R53 measured 0.875 KOhms. However, upon cleaning some of the soot on it with my finger, it started reading 0.93-0.95 KOhms. I can't read its color bands, but it's positioned exactly the same way as R51, just for Q15 instead of Q16, so it likely should be the same value as R51. So R53 is bad too.
                - Either D14 or D12 is bad (I can't tell which one had the bad part, as I removed all parts first, then measured them aftewards and lost track which one is which.) I suspect it was D14, since R53 seems to have more damage.
                - And finally, one of the C945 driver transistors on the secondary, Q12, has a low resistance reading (about 100 Ohms) on BE junction... so that one is bad too.

                And that's all I've found to test bad so far - 6 parts total (or 8, if you count the two 13009 BJTs.) Hopefully the SDC2921 didn't take a hit, because the base of Q12 (and Q11) are directly connected to it. With Q12 blown, though, that is a possibility. Of course, it could be that Q12 blew first, causing the primary BJTs to run only "one-sided" - i.e. either only Q15 or Q16 switching, causing the PWM to up the pulse until Q15/Q16 blew. But more likely, since both 13009 BJTs were blown... I think they blew first, which then sent a huge pulse of voltage on the secondary of the driver transformer, taking out Q12 and the rest of the parts on BJT drive circuit on the primary. Whatever, I guess we will see when I replace all the bad parts.

                Originally posted by momaka View Post
                For the primary caps, we get a pair of CapXon LP, 200V, 820 uF… in 22x42 mm size. IMO, that is suspiciously small for that capacity. I shall find out later.
                And their real capacity is....
                .
                .
                .
                .
                *drumroll*
                .
                .
                .
                .
                .
                625 uF only! (well, at least one of them is - I didn't remove both.)
                I checked several times too, just to make sure it wasn't a mistake on my meter. It wasn't. The meter measured that one "820 uF" CapXon LP every time at 625-628 uF. That's not even 680 uF worth of capacity! More like halfway between 560 uF and 680 uF.

                ESR-wise, that cap showed up as 80 mOhms, which I suppose is OK. Vloss was 0.5% or less.

                That said, even if these caps are 625-ish uF, that's still plenty of capacity... for a 300-350 Watt PSU. But I guess the primary couldn't even do that much.

                Well, that's all I have for now.
                Attached Files
                Last edited by momaka; 11-24-2020, 12:21 AM.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Re: KDMPower MIPC MI-X8775CD [PCB WF-C rev:E]

                  BJTs from the 1300x family are one of those parts just like LM358, LM317, 555 timer, and etc. - i.e. parts that aren't really the best in what they do, but very simple, cheap, and universal, so too good to go away / get replaced by something new.
                  When Motorola introduced their Switchmode series BJTs - 2N654x in TO-3 (actually, TO-204) and MJE1300x in TO-220 - they were the first BJTs optimized for use in switchmode power supplies. So they were some of the best at what they did ...... in the late 1970s. Similarly, LM358, et al, were top-notch parts, when National Semi first introduced them, and now they're still too good at what they do to obsolete them. I don't know whether On Semi still makes the MJE1300x series anymore.

                  I suspect you are correct about their persistence in very low-end PSUs. They are part of a suite of inexpensive, well known parts - TL494-clone PWMs, 13007/13009 BJTs, very mature ferrites (inexpensive and available from lots of sources), Micrometals -26 powdered iron cores, last-for-a-few-years junky sort-of-low-impedance output capacitors.

                  And that's all I've found to test bad so far - 6 parts total (or 8, if you count the two 13009 BJTs.) Hopefully the SDC2921 didn't take a hit, because the base of Q12 (and Q11) are directly connected to it. With Q12 blown, though, that is a possibility. Of course, it could be that Q12 blew first, causing the primary BJTs to run only "one-sided" - i.e. either only Q15 or Q16 switching, causing the PWM to up the pulse until Q15/Q16 blew. But more likely, since both 13009 BJTs were blown... I think they blew first, which then sent a huge pulse of voltage on the secondary of the driver transformer, taking out Q12 and the rest of the parts on BJT drive circuit on the primary. Whatever, I guess we will see when I replace all the bad parts.
                  My guess would be that one one of the 13009s shorted, took out the other, and then the resulting big current pulse blew back through the proportional drive transformer, T2, into the Q11/Q12 circuit.

                  BTW, your SDC2921 is a PWM-supervisor combo IC. The PWM circuit looks similar to the old SG3524 type voltage-mode PWM. The supervisor provides PG and the output voltages window detector can shut down the PWM in case of a UV or OV fault. https://pdf1.alldatasheet.com/datash...C/SDC2921.html
                  Last edited by PeteS in CA; 11-24-2020, 01:23 PM.
                  PeteS in CA

                  Power Supplies should be boring: No loud noises, no bright flashes, and no bad smells.
                  ****************************
                  To kill personal responsibility, initiative or success, punish it by taxing it. To encourage irresponsibility, improvidence, dependence and failure, reward it by subsidizing it.
                  ****************************
                  Anti-Covid-Vaxxer pig crap claim/prediction, Doctor: Heart Failure from mRNA Jabs "Will Kill Most People" | Principia Scientific Intl. ; Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche Warns COVID-19 Jab Injuries and Deaths Will Soon "Collapse Our Health System" (VIDEO) ; Fully Vaxxed May 2021; Since that time I've done 13 5Ks, 1 8K, 12 10Ks, and 4 half marathons

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Re: KDMPower MIPC MI-X8775CD [PCB WF-C rev:E]

                    Originally posted by PeteS in CA View Post
                    When Motorola introduced their Switchmode series BJTs - 2N654x in TO-3 (actually, TO-204) and MJE1300x in TO-220 - they were the first BJTs optimized for use in switchmode power supplies. So they were some of the best at what they did ...... in the late 1970s. Similarly, LM358, et al, were top-notch parts, when National Semi first introduced them, and now they're still too good at what they do to obsolete them.
                    Yeah, you're right. I should have said it differently. Those parts were indeed the best back when they came out... but today they aren't. Of course, they are still more than good enough, so that's why we probably won't see them get phased out anytime soon. Not to mention their availability and price.

                    Originally posted by PeteS in CA View Post
                    BTW, your SDC2921 is a PWM-supervisor combo IC.
                    Yes.
                    A lot of H-bridge PSUs now use similar chips that are essentially "decked out" PWM controllers with built in UV/OV/SC protections. SG6105 is another popular one, as are AT2005b, ATX2005, and WT7514L. Deer/Allied's "chip of the year" (i.e. 2003, 2005, and 2012) PWM controller is another one I think - good luck finding a datasheet for that one, though.

                    Anyways, that aside, I haven't made any other progress on this PSU yet. Also working on several other old computer stuff right now, so I do whichever one I feel in the mood for. For this one, I just have to pull the parts from the Raidmax PSU.
                    Last edited by momaka; 11-29-2020, 09:22 PM.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Attached Files

                      Comment


                        #12
                        KDMPower MIPC MI-X8775CD [PCB WF-C rev:E] - repaired! (part 2)

                        But then I had an idea. What if I use another working H-bridge PSU and take the driver pulses from it to try and drive the C945's in the KDM PSU? Seemed like a legit idea, so I tried it. The guinea pig PSU was this gutless Cyberlink PSU - another ultra-low-end CWT unit that I didn't mind loosing to an experiment, if something went south. That didn't happen, though. The way I wired it: the c945 Base-drive signals were taken from the Cyberlink PSU and dumped via jumper wires onto a breadboard, where I had a pair of C945 transistors with their Emitters and Collectors wired to the KDM PSU.
                        Why do it like that?
                        - Because there's no way to tell if the SDC2921 drive pins (which should be open-collector outputs) might try to “fight” or short the Base drives signals from the KDM PSU to ground. So this way, the Base of the C945 BJTs on the breadboard becomes only driven by the Cyberlink PSU and not connected to the KDM PSU board.

                        Once everything was wired, I connected PS_ON to ground only on the Cyberlink PSU. This should have made voltages also appear on the output of the KDM PSU, even if there was a fault on its output somewhere. But it didn't happen! The KDM PSU just made a slight “tick” noise, and that was it, with the output rails again going up no more than a few mV.

                        This didn't make sense! The KDM PSU should have done something more. But it didn't! After thinking for a while, at least this re-affirmed me that perhaps the SDC2921 may not have been the cause (which is good, because I found only one listing on eBay for this IC, and it was for a lot of 5 for $6 total - not expensive, but I dislike buying ICs that I would never end up using.)

                        Back to the drawing board and schematics… I suspected the driver transformer next. Thus, I looked into my transformer/inductor parts boxes and found the driver traffo from that gutless JNC/Meico PSU I mentioned above. What a trooper - it keeps on providing parts I need! This is why I DON'T throw away even the most gutless of PSUs.

                        I extracted the driver transformer from the KDM PSU and connected the one from the JNC in there temporarily with some wires on the back side (and taking good care to make sure the windings were all hooked in the correct order - which I did by looking at the original PCB of the JNC PSU… which now houses a fuse and some high-power diodes I use for other experiments nothing can R.I.P. here, lol! ).

                        While at it, I also put the original driver transformer of the KDM PSU next to the JNC one, just to show the differences. Note how much smaller the driver transformer of the KDM PSU is with its 16 mm core (vs. 19 mm on the JNC one.) And I thought that JNC PSU was “gutless”! What's more insulting is that the JNC PSU was only rated for 235 Watts, yet still has a bigger driver transformer, BJT resistors, and diodes, than the KDM PSU. This re-affirms my notion that the KDM PSU is really just another sub-300 Watt H-bridge unit. As such, no point in keeping the 2nd parallel MBR20100CT rectifier on the 12V rail, because this PSU just can't provide that kind of power anyways. So I removed it to upgrade other PSUs. In all honesty, even the Turbolink PSU shown above is starting to look good compared to this PSU.

                        Anyways, even with this new driver transformer setup, the KDM PSU was still dead, regardless if I tried to use the onboard SDC2921 or Cyberlink PSU to drive the C945 BJTs. Really, the only new difference with the JNC driver transformer was that the PSU made a slightly louder “tick” noise and the output voltages could jump up to the ~100mV range. But for all practical purposes, the PSU was still dead.

                        Like I said, I was about to throw the towel after this. I kept checking all components after each test above, to make sure nothing had gone bad, and nothing did. Clearly, however, if the PSU isn't working with external or internal base drive pulses and a replacement BJT driver transformer, something else was hiding from me. I know the JNC PSU driver transformer is good, because that PSU suffered from a single-transistor (with no feedback) 5VSB circuit going bad and killing the DBL494 power circuits.

                        Eventually, I decided to check the protection diodes across the C945 driver transistors (Q11 & Q12) one more time. The readings (in-circuit) didn't seem too unreasonable, though. The forward voltage drop was slightly low at ~0.29 to 0.3 mV (given they are 1N4148's), but I considered it “passable” due to other circuit components. Meanwhile in reverse direction, the voltage drop was a little over 1.1V across each diode, confusing me that perhaps there is indeed a circuit path somehow through the two 2.7-KOhm resistors connected between the secondary-side Aux. rail and the Bases of Q11 & Q12. Furthermore, when testing these diodes in reverse-bias in resistance mode, I was getting about 1.3 KOhms - which is very close to approximately ½ of the 2.7 KOhm resistors. But once Q11 and Q12 were removed and I re-checked the measurements of these diodes again, it became clear that a circuit path CANNOT exist and they should read open, regardless of those 2.7 KOhm resistors. So I desoldered those diodes and sure enough, one was showing a resistance out of circuit of about 1.x KOhms both ways! Yup, that booger got me!

                        So let that serve you (and me) as a lesson that component measurements in circuit cannot be trusted, even if things do look pretty normal.

                        Once I replaced both of these protection diodes (because, why replace one and risk more headache when I can replace both) and soldered back Q11 and Q12… VOILA! PSU was back to life, even with that jurry-rigged JNC driver transformer. Of course, I replaced it with the original KDM driver transformer after this. Sure enough, the PSU continued to work. Finally!

                        With that said, this KDM PSU is still far from being finished and ready to use in a computer. Obviously, it still needs EMI/RFI filters on the input. But I won't waste any time doing that before testing the PSU with a decent load first (likely by using a Ni-Chrome heater wire.) I only tried the PSU with a light load so far: ~1 Amp load on the 5V rail and 0.18 Amp load on the 12V rail. I have to say, though, I wasn't impressed at all with the voltage regulation - the 5V rail was fine ~5.1V, but the 12V rail was over spec @ 12.74V. Switching the load around (for a ~1.6 Amp load on the 12V rail and ~0.12 Amp load on the 5V rail), the 12V rail was in spec this time @ ~12.3V as was the 5V rail (barely) at 5.21V. At least the 3.3V was OK both times. Still, as I suspected, the lack of coupling between the rectified 5V and 12V rail transformer windings (a better group-regulated design) made the 5V and 12V rails cross-load pretty easily. I'm curious to see how this PSU will do with a real load. I still suspect it won't do too well… but maybe with a bigger load, it will. Who knows!

                        Anyways, that's all I have for now on this PSU. At least it's back to working condition.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Re: KDMPower MIPC MI-X8775CD [PCB WF-C rev:E]

                          Thanks for sharing this repair
                          9 PC LCD Monitor
                          6 LCD Flat Screen TV
                          30 Desk Top Switching Power Supply
                          10 Battery Charger Switching Power Supply for Power Tool
                          6 18v Lithium Battery Power Boards for Tool Battery Packs
                          1 XBox 360 Switching Power Supply and M Board
                          25 Servo Drives 220/460 3 Phase
                          6 De-soldering Station Switching Power Supply 1 Power Supply
                          1 Dell Mother Board
                          15 Computer Power Supply
                          1 HP Printer Supply & Control Board * lighting finished it *


                          These two repairs where found with a ESR meter...> Temp at 50*F then at 90*F the ESR reading more than 10%

                          1 Over Head Crane Current Sensing Board ( VFD Failure Five Years Later )
                          2 Hem Saw Computer Stack Board

                          All of these had CAPs POOF
                          All of the mosfet that are taken out by bad caps

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Re: KDMPower MIPC MI-X8775CD [PCB WF-C rev:E]

                            Thank you

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Re: KDMPower MIPC MI-X8775CD [PCB WF-C rev:E]

                              You're welcome guys.
                              I still haven't made much progress past fixing it. Still cooking up a plan for a PSU load tester (or rather, I just need to get down to building it - I have most of the parts already... it's just too cold in the garage this time of the year now, so that's what's kind of keeping me back a little.) Once that is complete, though, I think this might be the first PSU to go through it... well, we will see.

                              Also, the 20 Amp rectifier I stole from its 12V rail - that one has worked really nicely in an older Delta 300 Watt PSU, which originally only had a 16 Amp fast recovery rectifier. Now the 12V rail is about 0.1 to 0.2V higher under load on the Delta PSU. Before, it used to drop down to 11.8x Volts under moderate load. Now it's 11.95V or more. So a nice little improvement there. I don't think this KDMPower PSU will miss it, TBH... because again, I doubt I will be able to pull so much current from the 12V rail before the primary blows up.

                              And on that note, I might also steal the PCI-E power cables from it for a better Enermax PSU I am currently fixing up.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X