Originally posted by westom
- I've lived in 11 US States, 2 countries, and over 20 cities.
- Not a single one of them did this.
Originally posted by westom
- "routinely" - This hasn't happened in the US since 1926.
Originally posted by westom
Originally posted by westom
- DUH!
Not going to quote/repeat all that whole blurb of gibberish:
If there are conductors entering and leaving the cage then it isn't fully enclosed.
- This is because the biggest risk with lightening is the induced voltages [resultant from the EMP/EMI] in the general area and the paths those induced voltages take. - Not the direct path of the strike.
-
On grounding NLSI says: "A spectral study of lightning's typical impulse reveals both a high and a low frequency content. The grounding system appears to the lightning impulse as a transmission line where wave propagation theory applies. A considerable part of lightning's current responds horizontally when striking the ground: it is estimated that less than 15% of it penetrates the earth."
- This means that only 15% of a strike is dissipated via a direct grounding path.
- The remaining 85% is dissipated via inducing voltages in surrounding structures.
That is the EMP I've been talking about.
Originally posted by westom
Despite advertising claims and the fact that it helps a little if the strike isn't too close, Surge Protection isn't FOR lightening.
Originally posted by westom
"In most cases", in the real world, lightning damaged computers are 'beyond economical repair' - aka useless junk. The damage is typically extensive, random, it's diverse, and unique to that machine. There is little or no training value in having a student work on gear with multiple unknown problems. In fact it is DETRIMENTAL to learning because all it does is frustrate the student.
- That's why Electronics schools use test-rig training aids with ONE problem at a time.
- Any respectable, responsible, 'worth his pay' educator isn't going to hand students problems that the instructor himself doesn't know the solutions to, particularly when there may not be a solution.
That is irresponsible and a waste of the students time.
Originally posted by westom
- In the real world it's -ALL- about time and money.
THAT should be taught to students as well.
Outside of Academia recognizing "Beyond ECONOMICAL Repair" is a critical skill.
Originally posted by westom
Originally posted by westom
- It's shotgunning education.
Originally posted by westom
- One who has never actually worked on ANY kind of damaged equipment beyond simulated problems in a lab and one who has very little real world experience.
.
Leave a comment: