Re: New SSD hard drive in laptop computer what a difference in boot time
i use all spinning rust similar to george and ratdude except for one samsung ssd 830 pro 128gb i bought a decade ago when ssds started getting mainstream acceptance.
and the reason why i havent gone into ssds is because of the cost per gigabyte. while the points the ssd-using members have brought up are all valid, the cost per gigabyte for ssds still hasnt fallen to the point of competing with and replacing spinning rust, (REPLACE! that is the keyword here!) so it doesnt make sense for me to completely do away with spinning rust and put all my personal data on flash instead.
a quick look on amazon several months ago, shows that even the lowest grade qlc based ssd, the samsung qvo 2tb goes for US$299. an enterprise grade 2tb spinning rust disk goes for US$149. so even qlc flash is still twice the cost of enterprise grade spinning rust! the price still hasnt fallen yet to a point whereby its cheaper to replace spinning rust with flash thereby making spinning rust obsolete, so that is my point.
anyway, a few days ago, i bought more spinning rust albeit its enterprise grade, helium filled spinning rust. i bought the seagate exos x10 10tb (open box. never powered on according to the seller) on junkbay after reading that it had a very low AFR of less than 0.5% on backblaze's hd reports, one of the lowest.
i also bought the hitachi ultrastar he6 6tb (used), the next day. it was the world's first helium filled hard disk when it first came out so i decided to get one for posterity. also it seems that it was made in singapore when it first came out!
so its good to have for personal reasons! 
so those are my first two helium hard drives i ever got! i was also convinced of buying them after reading backblaze's hard drives reports again when they did a study of helium drives vs air-filled drives and they said that helium hard drives will have a lower failure rate given the exact same drive days and drive quantity. NOTE: in that report, it shows helium drives and air-filled drives having nearly the same failure rates but it was because they had less helium drives so thats why they showed very similar failure rates.
Sources: Backblaze - Hard Drive Data and Stats
Backblaze - The Helium Factor and Hard Drive Failure Rates
Backblaze - HGST 8TB Drives – Helium Makes Them Fly
i use all spinning rust similar to george and ratdude except for one samsung ssd 830 pro 128gb i bought a decade ago when ssds started getting mainstream acceptance.
and the reason why i havent gone into ssds is because of the cost per gigabyte. while the points the ssd-using members have brought up are all valid, the cost per gigabyte for ssds still hasnt fallen to the point of competing with and replacing spinning rust, (REPLACE! that is the keyword here!) so it doesnt make sense for me to completely do away with spinning rust and put all my personal data on flash instead.
a quick look on amazon several months ago, shows that even the lowest grade qlc based ssd, the samsung qvo 2tb goes for US$299. an enterprise grade 2tb spinning rust disk goes for US$149. so even qlc flash is still twice the cost of enterprise grade spinning rust! the price still hasnt fallen yet to a point whereby its cheaper to replace spinning rust with flash thereby making spinning rust obsolete, so that is my point.
anyway, a few days ago, i bought more spinning rust albeit its enterprise grade, helium filled spinning rust. i bought the seagate exos x10 10tb (open box. never powered on according to the seller) on junkbay after reading that it had a very low AFR of less than 0.5% on backblaze's hd reports, one of the lowest.
i also bought the hitachi ultrastar he6 6tb (used), the next day. it was the world's first helium filled hard disk when it first came out so i decided to get one for posterity. also it seems that it was made in singapore when it first came out!


so those are my first two helium hard drives i ever got! i was also convinced of buying them after reading backblaze's hard drives reports again when they did a study of helium drives vs air-filled drives and they said that helium hard drives will have a lower failure rate given the exact same drive days and drive quantity. NOTE: in that report, it shows helium drives and air-filled drives having nearly the same failure rates but it was because they had less helium drives so thats why they showed very similar failure rates.
Sources: Backblaze - Hard Drive Data and Stats
Backblaze - The Helium Factor and Hard Drive Failure Rates
Backblaze - HGST 8TB Drives – Helium Makes Them Fly
Comment