Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ratdude's Main rig V3.5

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • shovenose
    replied
    Re: Ratdude's Main rig V3.5

    Did you install sli bridge? If so remove it maybe it will work then?

    Leave a comment:


  • Uranium-235
    replied
    Re: Ratdude's Main rig V3.5

    if I remember off the top of my head, in MT86+ you hit C and then...2? I think

    Leave a comment:


  • ratdude747
    replied
    Re: Ratdude's Main rig V3.5

    Originally posted by gg1978 View Post
    as for your existing Win XP 64 bit install, that would probably BSOD no matter what, as you would probably have the wrong chipset drivers loaded, as i assume the last motherboard to boot that OS had a different chipset.
    Very true.

    Leave a comment:


  • gg1978
    replied
    Re: Ratdude's Main rig V3.5

    as for your existing Win XP 64 bit install, that would probably BSOD no matter what, as you would probably have the wrong chipset drivers loaded, as i assume the last motherboard to boot that OS had a different chipset.

    Leave a comment:


  • gg1978
    replied
    Re: Ratdude's Main rig V3.5

    i had a typo in the post about how i was running that board.. I had a PCIe 9400GT in the top PCIe slot, so that definately should work OK.. when you put two cards in SLI, i'm not sure if the PC will show a POST display on the second card..

    I was running 8 pin CPU power and the 24 pin ATX connector, as the acbel 550W PSU had both of those.. I don't recall any other connectors on the motherboard itself though

    Leave a comment:


  • ratdude747
    replied
    Re: Ratdude's Main rig V3.5

    I saw this in the Board's manual:

    There are three power connectors on your Thunder K8WE.
    The Thunder K8WE requires an EPS12V/SSI EEB 3.51 (24 pin + 8 pin) power
    supply to boot. TYAN recommends using a split plane power supply because of
    the amount of power the S2895 requires.
    You also have an option of using an SSI v3.51 workstation power supply. This
    is recommended when running both PCI Express slots
    Does that still apply if the GPU's have direct PSU connections?

    Leave a comment:


  • ratdude747
    replied
    Re: Ratdude's Main rig V3.5

    There was an Xp x64 install on the RAID array which immediately BSOD'd... however, I don't know if it was working previosly or not as V3 wasn't stable.

    The win 7 disc BSODed within seconds of a DVD boot attempt. BIOS would boot the disc, then a sec or two later, BSOD and hard reboot. Like something major was up. A RAM mapping issue would make sense but if it was working on 8gb ok, then I don't get why 16GB wouldn't. I may do a CMOS reset and start from scratch.

    Leave a comment:


  • Per Hansson
    replied
    Re: Ratdude's Main rig V3.5

    KZG's aside I think this is a software issue, do you have the latest BIOS?
    I would try XP 32bit, 64bit, Win7 32bit, 64bit
    In no particular order.

    Also keep in mind several Windows OS have had issues during installation with more than 2/4GB of RAM, so might be useful to remove all sticks bar one during install and let it do all Windows updates then put them back in.

    Also in systems like these the mapping of memory above 4GB is very important, there I can't help you with what is correct but trial and error usually solves it, or post what options you have and then I can give some recommendations.

    What it basically comes down to is KISS, i.e. remove/disable anything the system does not need to POST, then try install, if it works enable/reinstall things one by one

    Leave a comment:


  • ratdude747
    replied
    Re: Ratdude's Main rig V3.5

    ECC was indeed enabled. Not sure on Memtest... I knew it reported ECC status but I didn't know there were settings within memtest.

    My only other idea is since the upper pci-e wasn't tested... that could be the issue. Lot's of KZGs around there, so I'm still thinking a recap of all the KZGs would be a good idea just to be safe. KZGs make me wanna anyway...

    Leave a comment:


  • Uranium-235
    replied
    Re: Ratdude's Main rig V3.5

    I mean ECC in memtest86+, not in the cmos

    Leave a comment:


  • gg1978
    replied
    Re: Ratdude's Main rig V3.5

    might find this helpful...


    http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/26...-windows-64bit

    Leave a comment:


  • gg1978
    replied
    Re: Ratdude's Main rig V3.5

    It was running with (8) 1GB sticks of Reg ECC DDR, that were HP server pulls and a pair of Opteron 848's. I did run memtest on it over the weekend before i pulled the board from the system it was in. ECC should have been enabled already. It had one of the 550W AcBel PSU's running it. I never did try the second PCI slot, it had a 9400GT in the top PCIe slot.

    Leave a comment:


  • Uranium-235
    replied
    Re: Ratdude's Main rig V3.5

    yeah rat in memtest did you turn on ECC?

    Leave a comment:


  • goontron
    replied
    Re: Ratdude's Main rig V3.5

    Originally posted by shovenose View Post
    Moderators don't take sides.
    exactly and this moderator power has gone to your head for sure! and if you start to ban any of us for comments stating how your MOD power has gone to your head, we will chat with chris too.
    (this has happened on the forum i own before)
    Last edited by goontron; 07-23-2013, 12:59 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • thesloc
    replied
    Re: Ratdude's Main rig V3.5

    ECC Ram = FAIL

    Leave a comment:


  • shovenose
    replied
    Re: Ratdude's Main rig V3.5

    Moderators don't take sides.

    Leave a comment:


  • ratdude747
    replied
    Re: Ratdude's Main rig V3.5

    Originally posted by goontron View Post
    its on topic get use to it, we all have!
    Just as much as deer repellant is a hunting aid.

    Leave a comment:


  • goontron
    replied
    Re: Ratdude's Main rig V3.5

    Originally posted by ratdude747 View Post
    To those commenting on the post number one disclaimer: the job of a moderator is to keep rhreads on topic. This is not a "workstations suck" thread, so my disclaimer was warranted.

    Any further complaints: pm topcat.
    its on topic get use to it, we all have!

    Leave a comment:


  • Uranium-235
    replied
    Re: Ratdude's Main rig V3.5

    Originally posted by Ami Sapphire View Post
    Seems so. I actually managed to get Windows Vista SP2 working on my Tyan Tiger MPX S2466N-4M board, even the onboard NIC which has no Vista drivers, with no issues... then I installed WinXP Pro SP3 on it. I probably could get Win7 working on my board if I even bothered to do so.
    thats a 180 degree difference between his and your board. His is a 64-bit opteron server with an nvidia chipset

    vista probably had your drivers built in cause its such an old board

    Leave a comment:


  • ratdude747
    replied
    Re: Ratdude's Main rig V3.5

    To those commenting on the post number one disclaimer: the job of a moderator is to keep rhreads on topic. This is not a "workstations suck" thread, so my disclaimer was warranted.

    Any further complaints: pm topcat.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X