OK, my turn now.

And oh... uhm... where should I start here.

.
.
.

1st: that input "common-mode" choke - WTF is that?!

2nd: ceramic caps dipped in shiny blue paint to look like Y2-class caps - more lame!
3rd: mismatched brands of primary caps?!


4th... and I have to concur with Dan81 here: I don't think this PSU was made or designed by Topower. The label is indeed likely a BIG lie. The "LP" markings on the transformers and the PCB suggest Leadman Power - a.k.a. Powmax / Sun Pro. This is hands-down my least favorite PSU manufacturer... or most favorite worst manufacturer, I don't know anymore.

4.5: the heatsink style is another clue - I don't recall older Topower units using this "T-style" of heatsinks. Powmax / Leadman / Sun Pro, on the other hand, I do. At least with this unit you didn't get the cheapest crap heatsinks, though, unlike this Sun Pro KY-480ATX.
You got that right!

OK, let me continue... where was I now, #5? Oh screw it, I lost track already.

Awww isn't that cute. But it's wrooooong! (now guess which 90's cartoon I got this from.

Realistically speaking... even this TO-126 part should do the job for the 5VSB circuit. But come on, it's just cheap not to use a TO-220 part here.
Yeah, it's probably an ERL/EE/EI-33 size with the yellow tape on the sides off. And you're right, it's definitely too small for 400W - well, at least with this type of single-transistor forward converter design. Actually, even 150W might be asking a bit too much. That 2SK3569 MOSFET in TO-220FP won't be good for too much power.
Yeah, Powmax / Leadman has used this design quite a bit too. A -good- single-transistor forward design like this can manage 300-350 Watts with decent efficiency. But Powmax's hasn't been noted for that. Look up threads for "LP-6100", "LP-6100c", or "LP-6100d" and you will see. I have the last one (LP-6100d). Even though it looks built quite well, I've read in the past that Powmax's designs can't really hand too much power. Now, of course, I could be wrong about this unit, since it seems like a much more current version from 2011 (based on the PCB's markings)... but I wouldn't count on it.


Seems like you're enjoying this PSU's build "shenanigans" just like we are.
Yup, this PSU was clearly designed by "professionals". Don't try this at home (Yes, don't try using this PSU at home is probably what should be meant.

Don't you worry. That 2sc5027s BJT is heatsinked well!


BTW, it looks like the 3.3V rail's linear regulator (MOSFET) has also darkened the PCB underneath it quite a bit.
What? WHAT?



... And then they go use a crappy lame SBL1640CT for the 5V rail.
This totally makes sense!
*sigh* Leadman

Makes me wonder if that SBL3040PT is perhaps a reject part... or a salvaged part with one side shorted? Honestly, I can understand doing something like this at home for my own kludgy repairs. But for a PSU company to do this... just WOW.
No, they (Powmax / Leadman) actually got that part right... as if by a miracle.
In a forward-converter design in continuous mode (the main PS of this PSU, not the 5VSB), one side of the output rectifiers is always connected to ground. This is done so that after the "forward" power pulse (switch device on the primary side turning On and Off, sending a "spike" of power through the main transformer and one leg on each rectifier) goes into the output inductor, the output inductor then will want to "maintain" the current going through it. And to do that, it's only path of sourcing current is through the diode in each rectifier connected between ground and the winding on the inductor. This is called free-wheeling. Think of this concept - particularly the output inductor - like the rear wheel on a bike: you push on the pedals and you transfer a pulse of power to the rear wheels with each push. But you don't necessarily need to spin the pedals with constant force/power between each push - the rear sprocket bearing allows the rear wheel to spin freely without making the pedals/chain rotate... hence "free-wheeling". In forwards-converter designs, it's kind of similar to that analogy.

Do any of the cables have a valid UL number or other certificate number? If not, I'd consider the ratings on them at least somewhat questionable - particularly the voltage one.
Certainly the most "creative" name out there, isn't it.

Probably something like this went along...
Marketing department: Hey boss, we came up with these name's for our company's fans, but we can't quite decide yet. What do you think of them?
Boss (thinking in his/her head): Does the company really need a marketing department? Nah...
Boss: Your service of your department are no longer needed. You can all go home now.
Marketing department: But boss, what about the product's name? You can't just--
Boss: Fan. Our product will just bare the name 'fan'. No go home.

Well, I'd say do whatever you feel like with this PSU.
You could "beef it up" and try to improve it... but to be completely honest, I don't know how much your efforts will make a difference. It seems like a not-so-great PSU, really. Of course, if you wanted to do that just for fun and then somehow stress-test it and see if it blows up or does something funny, then by all means do.
It WAS worth it - you saved someone else $8 from buying this POS... plus who know how much headaches for them, if they aren't as well-versed in electronics/PSUs/computers as you are. For all you know, you could have saved someone's really important data or only computer from blowing up / burning out when this PSU goes out. It may seem strange to think of it this way... but that's what it is, really.

Leave a comment: