So I have received two Panasonic CF-18 toughbooks.
One has a Wacom Digitizer (with the pen), 900mhz Pentium M, 256mb DDR ram and a sticker for Windows XP tablet but the LCD is cracked. The other has a touchscreen, 1.2ghz Pentium M, 512mb DDR2 ram, and a sticker for Windows XP Pro. It however has a good LCD.
Both came with batteries and caddies and the LCD between the two systems are identical so I can peel the digitizer off the broken one and swap it out if I want and that is what I want to do so I can then run XP tablet and the digitizer on the much faster machine (and I have DDR2 ram growing on trees at work so it's the preferred choice).
The problem however is that while a connection exists for the touchscreen on both computers, only the slower 900mhz motherboard (by the way, the processors are BGA and permantntly on the boards) has the connector for the digitizer to plug into. The 1.2 has the pads for the connector but it's just not there.
I read up a little and apparently the digitizer is serial and not USB which explains why the touchscreen model has a serial port while the digitizer model does not. Can I be safe to assume that the removal of the serial port is because of the digitizer using the same resources and that the connector pads for the digitizer (14 pins) and the serial port (9 pins, obviously) are directly connected together and that if I were to transplant the connector from one board to the other and remove the serial port I should be fine or will there be additional SMT components I would be missing?
I can't probe the pads and the serial port to see if the connections exist right now as I left my DMM on again and the battery has died.
One has a Wacom Digitizer (with the pen), 900mhz Pentium M, 256mb DDR ram and a sticker for Windows XP tablet but the LCD is cracked. The other has a touchscreen, 1.2ghz Pentium M, 512mb DDR2 ram, and a sticker for Windows XP Pro. It however has a good LCD.
Both came with batteries and caddies and the LCD between the two systems are identical so I can peel the digitizer off the broken one and swap it out if I want and that is what I want to do so I can then run XP tablet and the digitizer on the much faster machine (and I have DDR2 ram growing on trees at work so it's the preferred choice).
The problem however is that while a connection exists for the touchscreen on both computers, only the slower 900mhz motherboard (by the way, the processors are BGA and permantntly on the boards) has the connector for the digitizer to plug into. The 1.2 has the pads for the connector but it's just not there.
I read up a little and apparently the digitizer is serial and not USB which explains why the touchscreen model has a serial port while the digitizer model does not. Can I be safe to assume that the removal of the serial port is because of the digitizer using the same resources and that the connector pads for the digitizer (14 pins) and the serial port (9 pins, obviously) are directly connected together and that if I were to transplant the connector from one board to the other and remove the serial port I should be fine or will there be additional SMT components I would be missing?
I can't probe the pads and the serial port to see if the connections exist right now as I left my DMM on again and the battery has died.

Comment