Got a msi 694d pro v1.0 off ebay reasonably cheaply, with bad caps... Normally I'd just warm up the vacuum desoldering station and get to work, but after poking around the forums, noticed a few mildly disturbing things about this board I figured I should check before I started.
The first one... C390 backwards?! On my board, this is one of the less-funky capacitors, and looks pretty close to normal, with a very slightly rounded top. The capacitor is installed with the negative stripe aligned with the solid semicircle, like all the other caps. Due to its being in relatively good condition, it seems pretty odd it could have been living at reverse polarity for very long... and I think it's just a filter cap for the pci slots, but 3.9V doesn't sound like 3.3 nor 5. On mine the negative side is towards pci3, and the positive side towards pci2 (the side the AGP slot, cpus, etc is on).
Has anyone else made observations of the voltage on this capacitor? Should I find an old cpu, disposable ram, etc to stick in it, and try to get it to turn on long enough to measure the voltage on it? It makes the going-to-fry-things siren when it's turned on and no POST (rarely inits the video card and mostly POSTs, but usually completely dead), don't really want to stick one of my nice cpus in it...
Second, neither of the cap kits mentioned on badcaps (the one posted in the msi section nor the one on the site) seem to match this board.
Caps on this board:
6 Tayeh 2700uf 6.3v. All ready to pop.
1 Tayeh 1500uf 6.3v. Looks OK. for now.
4 Teapo 1500uf 10v. All look OK, but for Teapo's, that doesn't seem to mean much.
8 Chhsi 1000uf 6.3v. About half are swollen.
3 Chhsi 470uf 16v. All look OK. They are C19 (between the pci slots and the corner of the southbridge), C486 (by the bios chip and the usb2 header), and C31/C526 (can't tell which is which) (directly behind the usb plugs).
The kit listed on the website contains 11 1000uf 10v caps, apparently with the idea of replacing the 16v caps with 10v ones? No mention of 470uf caps is made on the "x replaces y" list though. Are these just 16v caps being used on the 5v line, with half the capacitance of the other ones? Is it worth replacing 470uf caps, which don't seem to fail very often?
The kit posted to the forum instead gives 8 1000uf 6.3v caps, and 3 1000uf 6.3v "low profile" caps. Again, hoping MSI just put 16v caps on the 5v line...
After rummaging around in my cap bins, I plan to:
Replace the 6 2700uf 6.3v caps with 3300uf 6.3v Nichicon PL series caps.
Replace the 1 1500uf 6.3v cap with another 3300uf 6.3v Nichicon PL cap, on the assumption that doubling the rating can't be a bad thing.
Replace the 4 1500uf 10v caps with 2200uf 16v Nichicon PW caps.
Replace the 8 1000uf 6.3v caps with 1200uf 6.3v Panasonic FA caps.
Ignore the 3 470uf 16v caps.
(This particular selection based on my not having to go buy anything.
Do people think I should replace the 470uf caps? I don't have any good replacements handy, so rather not replace them unless they're likely to fail. I've never seen ones this small fail, but if other people have, then I probably should replace them now rather than have to pull whatever box I build with this apart later.
Thanks in advance,
--Randy
(who would have used the username "randyg", but for some reason it's "not allowed"?)
The first one... C390 backwards?! On my board, this is one of the less-funky capacitors, and looks pretty close to normal, with a very slightly rounded top. The capacitor is installed with the negative stripe aligned with the solid semicircle, like all the other caps. Due to its being in relatively good condition, it seems pretty odd it could have been living at reverse polarity for very long... and I think it's just a filter cap for the pci slots, but 3.9V doesn't sound like 3.3 nor 5. On mine the negative side is towards pci3, and the positive side towards pci2 (the side the AGP slot, cpus, etc is on).
Has anyone else made observations of the voltage on this capacitor? Should I find an old cpu, disposable ram, etc to stick in it, and try to get it to turn on long enough to measure the voltage on it? It makes the going-to-fry-things siren when it's turned on and no POST (rarely inits the video card and mostly POSTs, but usually completely dead), don't really want to stick one of my nice cpus in it...
Second, neither of the cap kits mentioned on badcaps (the one posted in the msi section nor the one on the site) seem to match this board.
Caps on this board:
6 Tayeh 2700uf 6.3v. All ready to pop.
1 Tayeh 1500uf 6.3v. Looks OK. for now.
4 Teapo 1500uf 10v. All look OK, but for Teapo's, that doesn't seem to mean much.
8 Chhsi 1000uf 6.3v. About half are swollen.
3 Chhsi 470uf 16v. All look OK. They are C19 (between the pci slots and the corner of the southbridge), C486 (by the bios chip and the usb2 header), and C31/C526 (can't tell which is which) (directly behind the usb plugs).
The kit listed on the website contains 11 1000uf 10v caps, apparently with the idea of replacing the 16v caps with 10v ones? No mention of 470uf caps is made on the "x replaces y" list though. Are these just 16v caps being used on the 5v line, with half the capacitance of the other ones? Is it worth replacing 470uf caps, which don't seem to fail very often?
The kit posted to the forum instead gives 8 1000uf 6.3v caps, and 3 1000uf 6.3v "low profile" caps. Again, hoping MSI just put 16v caps on the 5v line...
After rummaging around in my cap bins, I plan to:
Replace the 6 2700uf 6.3v caps with 3300uf 6.3v Nichicon PL series caps.
Replace the 1 1500uf 6.3v cap with another 3300uf 6.3v Nichicon PL cap, on the assumption that doubling the rating can't be a bad thing.
Replace the 4 1500uf 10v caps with 2200uf 16v Nichicon PW caps.
Replace the 8 1000uf 6.3v caps with 1200uf 6.3v Panasonic FA caps.
Ignore the 3 470uf 16v caps.
(This particular selection based on my not having to go buy anything.

Do people think I should replace the 470uf caps? I don't have any good replacements handy, so rather not replace them unless they're likely to fail. I've never seen ones this small fail, but if other people have, then I probably should replace them now rather than have to pull whatever box I build with this apart later.
Thanks in advance,
--Randy
(who would have used the username "randyg", but for some reason it's "not allowed"?)
Comment