Look at the MCZ here (the ZLH is for comparison and came from a reliable source (Farnell/Newark).
Looks quite good, just fairly tall for its capacitance (about 22mm), and isnt listed in the MCZ datasheet...
If it werent for the totally wrong, crapcap-style bung, id just say its a specially made part. But with this style of bung? Theres absolutely no reason any OEM would tell Rubycon to use this style, because it causes trouble (see the white flux residiue?) and probably costs more to modify production lines then the 2 pico-cents it saves per part.
Now with no data for ESR, replacement is bit of a problem.
Looks quite good, just fairly tall for its capacitance (about 22mm), and isnt listed in the MCZ datasheet...
If it werent for the totally wrong, crapcap-style bung, id just say its a specially made part. But with this style of bung? Theres absolutely no reason any OEM would tell Rubycon to use this style, because it causes trouble (see the white flux residiue?) and probably costs more to modify production lines then the 2 pico-cents it saves per part.
Now with no data for ESR, replacement is bit of a problem.
Comment