Aaaaand… we have more retro-PC nostalgia repairs again.
This time it's with a XFX GeForce 6800 XT AGP video card. The XFX model number is PV-T42K-UDE3.
As with many early XFX cards, crap caps are the main issue here. The first one I bought and recapped was back in 2017. I've been meaning to post about it for a long time, but never got around to it due to the card needing a better heatsink/cooler to test it fully with the recap (more on that later on.) In the meantime, I acquired a 2nd one of these cards not too long ago (February.) Not like this makes any difference. Both cards came with exactly the same crappy GSC/Evercon caps bulged, despite being from different sellers on eBay. Here are pictures of the 1st card, as it came to me:



And for those who want to see higher-res pictures, here is the 2nd card:
https://www.badcaps.net/forum/attach...1&d=1595709723
https://www.badcaps.net/forum/attach...1&d=1595709723
https://www.badcaps.net/forum/attach...1&d=1595709723
Probably no need to say it so many times now… but what the heck: GSC/Evercon caps are _GARBAGE_
Here is what a 1500 uF Evercon ME and a 1000 uF Evercon ME from the 1st card showed on the cap tester:


- Yup, clearly failed.
The caps from the 2nd card were the same too, more or less (only slightly higher ESR and slightly lower capacitance, with one 1500 uF cap being completely open.) But you know what – at least they still show some capacitance, despite the high ESR. I can't say the same about Sacon FZ, though, which almost always like to go completely or nearly open-circuit with just a few picoFarads of capacitance remaining.
One would think that with time (and name changes) GSC/Evercon/Sacon would improve quality a bit. Instead, they went the other way and figured to make their caps even more crap. LOL?
Anyways, moving onto the recap… there are 5 major power rails on this video card to be aware of:
1) 12V rail from PSU for GPU VRM high-side
2) 3.3V rail from PSU/motherboard AGP connector for RAM VRM high-side
3) GPU V_core
4) RAM V_dd
5) GPU V_tt
I marked each one of these on the following cap diagram:

Note that there are some free/unpopulated cap spots that could also be filled in, if desired. For those who can't view the pictures or just want “numbers” to work with, here is a list of the caps connected to each rail.
**** 12V rail from PSU for GPU VRM high-side:
CE1 (SMD-only): unpopulated, 8 mm dia.
CE2 (SMD-only): 16V, 470 uF, 8 mm dia. SMD, not sure of brand
CE3 (SMD-only): unpopulated, 8 mm dia.
**** 3.3V rail from PSU/motherboard AGP connector for RAM VRM high-side:
C89 (SMD-only): unpopulated, 6.3 mm dia.
CE31 (SMD-only): unpopulated, 8 mm dia
CE16 / CE17 (SMD and through-hole, 8 or 10 mm dia.): 16V, 470 uF, 8 mm dia. SMD, unsure of brand
**** GPU V_core
CE4 / CE25: Evercon ME, 6.3V, 1500 uF, 10x13 mm
CE5 / CE26: Evercon ME, 6.3V, 1500 uF, 10x13 mm
CE6 / CE27: Evercon ME, 6.3V, 1500 uF, 10x13 mm
CE32 / CE34: Evercon ME, 6.3V, 1000 uF, 8x13 mm
CE33 / CE35: unpopulated
* Note: all of the above cap spots can accommodate both SMD and through-hole caps in 8 mm and 10 mm diameter.
**** RAM Vdd
CE22 / CE30: unpopulated
CE23 / CE28: Evercon ME, 6.3V, 1500 uF, 10x13 mm
CE24 / CE29: Evercon ME, 6.3V, 1500 uF, 10x13 mm
* Note: all of the above cap spots can accommodate both SMD and through-hole caps in 8 mm and 10 mm diameter.
**** RAM Vtt
CE21 (SMD-only): 16V, 470 uF, 8 mm dia., SMD, not sure of brand
So for a minimal but complete recap, one would need 6x caps, rated for 4V minimum and 1200 to 2200 uF. For the GPU V_core, even 2.5V caps can be used (and I did that, as I will show later on.) To keep things simple, though, something like Panasonic FS (P/N: EEUFS0J152) or Rubycon ZLH (P/N: 6.3ZLH1200MEFC10X12.5) would probably work fine. And if you don't mind sacrificing a PCI slot below the AGP slot to make the card take two slots, you can go with taller 16-20 mm caps. On that note, something along the lines of Rubycon ZLH (6.3ZLH2200MEFC10X20), Panasonic FM (EEUFM0J152__), Panasonic FR (EEUFR0J222__), Panasonic FS (EEUFS0J202__), United Chemicon KZE (EKZE6R3E__152MJ20S), and United Chemicon KZH (EKZH6R3E__222MJ20S) would all work fine. All of these are currently widely available. Using polymer caps is another option.
Given that this card still actually worked even with the bulged Evercon ME caps, it's clear that it's not too picky about cap specs.
With that, I did a test recap on the 1st card by replacing all of the caps with United Chemicon KZG 6.3V, 820 uF caps I had pulled from a motherboard. (Note that Chemicon KZG, especially the above 6.3V, 820 uF caps, are known to have problems when not in use. Mine tested OK, so I only put them in to test the card's stability.)
https://www.badcaps.net/forum/attach...1&d=1595709723
The recap worked well, so I revised it slightly with some salvaged Sanyo SEPC 4V, 1200 uF polymer caps, among a few other changes:

That recap worked fine too, and I left the 1st card as-is ever since. Why? Because the stock cooler, like on most cards from that era, was not adequately cooling the card and I didn't want to test any further with it. It wasn't until I completed a modded cooler for the 2nd 6800 XT that I finally did a full set of stress tests.
Anyways, that is all regarding the recap on this XFX GeForce 6800 XT.
Before leaving, here is a GPU-Z screenshot, as always:

- Captain Junk Repairs singing out... for now.
This time it's with a XFX GeForce 6800 XT AGP video card. The XFX model number is PV-T42K-UDE3.
As with many early XFX cards, crap caps are the main issue here. The first one I bought and recapped was back in 2017. I've been meaning to post about it for a long time, but never got around to it due to the card needing a better heatsink/cooler to test it fully with the recap (more on that later on.) In the meantime, I acquired a 2nd one of these cards not too long ago (February.) Not like this makes any difference. Both cards came with exactly the same crappy GSC/Evercon caps bulged, despite being from different sellers on eBay. Here are pictures of the 1st card, as it came to me:
And for those who want to see higher-res pictures, here is the 2nd card:
https://www.badcaps.net/forum/attach...1&d=1595709723
https://www.badcaps.net/forum/attach...1&d=1595709723
https://www.badcaps.net/forum/attach...1&d=1595709723
Probably no need to say it so many times now… but what the heck: GSC/Evercon caps are _GARBAGE_

Here is what a 1500 uF Evercon ME and a 1000 uF Evercon ME from the 1st card showed on the cap tester:
- Yup, clearly failed.


Anyways, moving onto the recap… there are 5 major power rails on this video card to be aware of:
1) 12V rail from PSU for GPU VRM high-side
2) 3.3V rail from PSU/motherboard AGP connector for RAM VRM high-side
3) GPU V_core
4) RAM V_dd
5) GPU V_tt
I marked each one of these on the following cap diagram:
Note that there are some free/unpopulated cap spots that could also be filled in, if desired. For those who can't view the pictures or just want “numbers” to work with, here is a list of the caps connected to each rail.
**** 12V rail from PSU for GPU VRM high-side:
CE1 (SMD-only): unpopulated, 8 mm dia.
CE2 (SMD-only): 16V, 470 uF, 8 mm dia. SMD, not sure of brand
CE3 (SMD-only): unpopulated, 8 mm dia.
**** 3.3V rail from PSU/motherboard AGP connector for RAM VRM high-side:
C89 (SMD-only): unpopulated, 6.3 mm dia.
CE31 (SMD-only): unpopulated, 8 mm dia
CE16 / CE17 (SMD and through-hole, 8 or 10 mm dia.): 16V, 470 uF, 8 mm dia. SMD, unsure of brand
**** GPU V_core
CE4 / CE25: Evercon ME, 6.3V, 1500 uF, 10x13 mm
CE5 / CE26: Evercon ME, 6.3V, 1500 uF, 10x13 mm
CE6 / CE27: Evercon ME, 6.3V, 1500 uF, 10x13 mm
CE32 / CE34: Evercon ME, 6.3V, 1000 uF, 8x13 mm
CE33 / CE35: unpopulated
* Note: all of the above cap spots can accommodate both SMD and through-hole caps in 8 mm and 10 mm diameter.
**** RAM Vdd
CE22 / CE30: unpopulated
CE23 / CE28: Evercon ME, 6.3V, 1500 uF, 10x13 mm
CE24 / CE29: Evercon ME, 6.3V, 1500 uF, 10x13 mm
* Note: all of the above cap spots can accommodate both SMD and through-hole caps in 8 mm and 10 mm diameter.
**** RAM Vtt
CE21 (SMD-only): 16V, 470 uF, 8 mm dia., SMD, not sure of brand
So for a minimal but complete recap, one would need 6x caps, rated for 4V minimum and 1200 to 2200 uF. For the GPU V_core, even 2.5V caps can be used (and I did that, as I will show later on.) To keep things simple, though, something like Panasonic FS (P/N: EEUFS0J152) or Rubycon ZLH (P/N: 6.3ZLH1200MEFC10X12.5) would probably work fine. And if you don't mind sacrificing a PCI slot below the AGP slot to make the card take two slots, you can go with taller 16-20 mm caps. On that note, something along the lines of Rubycon ZLH (6.3ZLH2200MEFC10X20), Panasonic FM (EEUFM0J152__), Panasonic FR (EEUFR0J222__), Panasonic FS (EEUFS0J202__), United Chemicon KZE (EKZE6R3E__152MJ20S), and United Chemicon KZH (EKZH6R3E__222MJ20S) would all work fine. All of these are currently widely available. Using polymer caps is another option.
Given that this card still actually worked even with the bulged Evercon ME caps, it's clear that it's not too picky about cap specs.
With that, I did a test recap on the 1st card by replacing all of the caps with United Chemicon KZG 6.3V, 820 uF caps I had pulled from a motherboard. (Note that Chemicon KZG, especially the above 6.3V, 820 uF caps, are known to have problems when not in use. Mine tested OK, so I only put them in to test the card's stability.)
https://www.badcaps.net/forum/attach...1&d=1595709723
The recap worked well, so I revised it slightly with some salvaged Sanyo SEPC 4V, 1200 uF polymer caps, among a few other changes:
That recap worked fine too, and I left the 1st card as-is ever since. Why? Because the stock cooler, like on most cards from that era, was not adequately cooling the card and I didn't want to test any further with it. It wasn't until I completed a modded cooler for the 2nd 6800 XT that I finally did a full set of stress tests.
Anyways, that is all regarding the recap on this XFX GeForce 6800 XT.
Before leaving, here is a GPU-Z screenshot, as always:
- Captain Junk Repairs singing out... for now.

Comment