I would like to replace all the caps on this board.
Welcome Zorlac,
Oh no! Please don't tell me that the new intel-brand board based on the 975X chipset already has bad caps! Or do you simply not trust the Nichicon HN that intel uses after the incident with Nichicon a few years ago?
As for the "best" replacement caps, well, as with anything "best" or "most", it's a subjective matter. Certainly from what I have seen around and learned on this forum, I would recommend either Rubycon MBZ or Sanyo WG, if you seek maximum reliability in low-ESR caps. United Chemicon is also a very good choice as far as cap brands go.
Regarding make/model/quantity: well, quite simply, look at what your board uses now, and choose caps of identical specifications or, failing that, slightly higher, both in terms of voltage and capacitance.
I have just built a system with this motherboard. Why is it necessary to change the caps?
Gigabyte EP45-DS3L Ultra Reliable (Power saver)
Intel E8400 (3000Mhz) Bios temps. 4096Mb 800Mhz DDR2 Corsair XMS2 4-4-4-12
160Gb WD SATAII Server grade
Nvidia 8500GT 256Mb
160Gb WD eSATAII Server grade for backup.
Samsung 18x DVD writer
Pioneer 16x DVD writer + 6x Dual layer
33 way card reader
Windows XP Pro SP3
Thermaltake Matrix case with 430W Silent Power
17" Benq FP737s LCD monitor
HP Officejet Pro K5300 with refillable tanks
I just want to replace them for better OC capability, longer lifespan, better stability, and the bling factor! LOL
So are "Aluminium Electrolytic Polymer Capacitors" better than "Aluminium Electrolytic Wet Capacitors"?
These are the caps I was told that I need:
6.3v 820uf for pcie/ram/pci
16v 470uf for pwm
10v 330uf for others
Also, how would I go about finding out which caps I can just remove without replacing? For instance, I have no need for the onboard sound, parallel ports, serial ports, PS/2 ports, IDE, floppy and probably a few other things I am not thinking of...
EDIT: Rubycon MCZ seems to be lower ESR than MBZ. Why do you recommend MBZ then? ...just curious
if you want to OC, why get yourself an original intel board?
for OC you should look at stuff from asus, msi, Abit, DFI...
for longer lifespan, better stability see the Gigabyte DS series boards with All Solid Capacitor.
if you want to OC, why get yourself an original intel board?
for OC you should look at stuff from asus, msi, Abit, DFI...
for longer lifespan, better stability see the Gigabyte DS series boards with All Solid Capacitor.
intel boards have different capacitors depending on which revision of the board. better to post some pics of your board (preferably from different sides) so we can advise you what to replace.
Also, what do you mean by forget those caps? Which caps (Voltage/uF) would I use in their place? Or are you saying I do not need them at all....or leave them as is (do not remove them)?
Now you need Rubycon or similar. As you are in the USA contact Topcat. Owns this forum and specialises in supplying the right quality caps.
Check this link: https://www.badcaps.net/
Gigabyte EP45-DS3L Ultra Reliable (Power saver)
Intel E8400 (3000Mhz) Bios temps. 4096Mb 800Mhz DDR2 Corsair XMS2 4-4-4-12
160Gb WD SATAII Server grade
Nvidia 8500GT 256Mb
160Gb WD eSATAII Server grade for backup.
Samsung 18x DVD writer
Pioneer 16x DVD writer + 6x Dual layer
33 way card reader
Windows XP Pro SP3
Thermaltake Matrix case with 430W Silent Power
17" Benq FP737s LCD monitor
HP Officejet Pro K5300 with refillable tanks
Rubycon MCZ seems to be lower ESR than MBZ. Why do you recommend MBZ then? ...just curious
MCZ are also great - I mentioned MBZ due to the fact that availability of MCZ is not always that great, and either of the two will, realistically, perform equally well. Specwise, MCZ does have lower ESR than MBZ, indeed.
Here you find a high-resolution pic of the board in question, in which many of the caps are identifiable (NB: this does *not* mean that every unit of this board will have these same caps, of course). Visible are Nichicon, UCC, and a number of Sanyo. The 3300uf, 6.3v ones are Nichicon HM(M), as is typical for intel-brand boards.
Comment