Re: The PacMan ATX Computer Case - cleaning and painting
IIRC the 8" floppies used a 50-pin card edge connector, but still is "standard" and could be adapted to the typical 34-pin. The DB37 attests to that, not all 50 pins are used.
I also will have to disagree, I thought the 3½" floppies were more reliable than 5¼" probably due to enclosed cartridge that were difficult to fold. I'd imagine all floppy drives used a sliding head system, though 3½" drives tend to invariably use a leadscrew type much like compact disk. 5¼" drives however are a mixture from leadscrew to rack and pinion type head movement. 8" drives tend to always be rack and pinion type.
Similarly 3½" drives used direct drive motors, and 5¼" drives were a mixture of direct and belt driven. 8" drives seem invariably belt driven.
The 8" floppies I was terrified to use as these were really unreliable IMHO, they got dirty easily and scraped up the media like mad. The motors are really torquey and strip through anything.
IIRC the 8" floppies used a 50-pin card edge connector, but still is "standard" and could be adapted to the typical 34-pin. The DB37 attests to that, not all 50 pins are used.
I also will have to disagree, I thought the 3½" floppies were more reliable than 5¼" probably due to enclosed cartridge that were difficult to fold. I'd imagine all floppy drives used a sliding head system, though 3½" drives tend to invariably use a leadscrew type much like compact disk. 5¼" drives however are a mixture from leadscrew to rack and pinion type head movement. 8" drives tend to always be rack and pinion type.
Similarly 3½" drives used direct drive motors, and 5¼" drives were a mixture of direct and belt driven. 8" drives seem invariably belt driven.
The 8" floppies I was terrified to use as these were really unreliable IMHO, they got dirty easily and scraped up the media like mad. The motors are really torquey and strip through anything.


) So as a test, I used WinRAR to compress the file, which came down to 59 KBs of data.
After this, I wrote it onto the 5.25” floppy, then copied it back from the floppy onto the HDD and decompressed to see if the file was still intact and readable… and miraculously, it was! 
Or some of the other popular free image editors there.
)
Yes, it probably will look tacky (but understandable, given the case design, no?) And while at it, maybe also paint the Reset button blue?? That way, when the PC is on, there will be the Red and Green LEDs, along with the Blue reset button, for a complete RGB color space.
Eventually, it started to spray semi-normally… well, better than the yellow paint anyways.
It took several tries to get it as bad as was shown above. But I couldn't do anything else at this point.
– especially considering the fact I used a free “TRASH” printer! 
) This case itself also was a good fit for this card, since it has the provisions for really good ventilation – namely, a 120 mm side and rear fans. Despite the extensive cooling mods, that 6800 XT still runs hot and produces a good deal of heat inside the case. If installed in a PC that has a case with suboptimal cooling, things really can get toasty inside. I just ran the PC again yesterday, and even with a cool 18°C (64°F) room temperature, I could feel warm air coming out of the case. No surprise, though - the whole setup idles at 100 Watts at the wall, and that's with a slightly under-volted CPU. At max CPU + GPU load, I get around 150-160 Watts power at the wall. A rear 120 mm fan is definitely a requirement for that kind of heat generation. And the side fan would be great for cooling the 6800 XT's VRMs, since they still run on the very warm side.
Hitachi?), a Pioneer DVDRW (that, despite being dusty, still reads discs lol), a HIS Radeon X300 256MB GPU (which got replaced by a Geforce 7300, as the X300 developed artefafts without me doing anything), 3GB worth of DDR400 and a lone disconnected floppy drive - not even the ribbon was there.
Comment