Re: EEPROM function confusion
... or the signal (and power) QUALITY was better (less noise/ripple)
(don't forget GND in this analysis!)
... or the levels on the signals were better (than "typ.")
... or the timing relationships between signals were safer
... or the temperature it was operating at was different
... or...
The question I'd be asking myself is: how do I know that the data I've apparently recovered is actually correct?
... or the signal (and power) QUALITY was better (less noise/ripple)
(don't forget GND in this analysis!)
... or the levels on the signals were better (than "typ.")
... or the timing relationships between signals were safer
... or the temperature it was operating at was different
... or...
The question I'd be asking myself is: how do I know that the data I've apparently recovered is actually correct?
Comment