We got in a whole bunch of these at $1000 each brand new from CDW. They're configured with a single E5504 quad core 2.0ghz, can support dual. Come stock with 2x2gb ddr3, and no drives
So, let's play with some hard drives, shall we?
The drives are HP DG0146FAMWL. They're 146gb 10k Dual-Port SAS drives.
First up, we have 3 of them in a RAID5 config, with a 256mb cache module upgrade installed:

Fairly predictable. Nice throughput start to finish, with a little bit of rotational speed loss, and a nice burst to the controller.
Next, let's look at 4 of these in RAID10 with no cache upgrade:

Interesting... Better throughput, but with no rotational loss. Access is a little better, but burst is lacking. (Keep in mind this is same server, just different drive configs)
Okay, so lets give it the beans and throw the 256mb cache in there.
So, RAID10, 4 drives, 256mb cache installed:

SWEET JEEBUS! Guess I just found the reason for no rotational loss in the last one... the controller wasn't keeping up with the drives, even at their slowest! So, we have incredible throughput, obvious rotational loss, but an incredible average! Burst rate is still not the same as the RAID5, which confuses me.
Still, this makes for one fast server! Unfortunately, immediately following the last test, I shut the server down, and now it won't POST. I think when I removed the cache module from it again, I might've borked something up. Still working on that...
So, let's play with some hard drives, shall we?
The drives are HP DG0146FAMWL. They're 146gb 10k Dual-Port SAS drives.
First up, we have 3 of them in a RAID5 config, with a 256mb cache module upgrade installed:
Fairly predictable. Nice throughput start to finish, with a little bit of rotational speed loss, and a nice burst to the controller.
Next, let's look at 4 of these in RAID10 with no cache upgrade:
Interesting... Better throughput, but with no rotational loss. Access is a little better, but burst is lacking. (Keep in mind this is same server, just different drive configs)
Okay, so lets give it the beans and throw the 256mb cache in there.
So, RAID10, 4 drives, 256mb cache installed:
SWEET JEEBUS! Guess I just found the reason for no rotational loss in the last one... the controller wasn't keeping up with the drives, even at their slowest! So, we have incredible throughput, obvious rotational loss, but an incredible average! Burst rate is still not the same as the RAID5, which confuses me.
Still, this makes for one fast server! Unfortunately, immediately following the last test, I shut the server down, and now it won't POST. I think when I removed the cache module from it again, I might've borked something up. Still working on that...
Comment