Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The 2016 Operating System Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • momaka
    replied
    Re: The 2016 Operating System Thread

    Originally posted by stj View Post
    a lot of embedded xp is out there,
    casino slots, cash machines etc.

    you dont see that stuff being "upgraded" to 7 for the sake of it.
    Indeed.
    I've seen ATM machines still running Windows 98 as recent as last summer.

    Also, same with a lot of industrial machines and gear. If the machine meets the daily production quota / market demand, you don't pull it down/offline to upgrade, just because Microsoft released a brand new silly OS. Do you even know how much it costs to stop production just for a few hours at some factories?

    Originally posted by shovenose
    so there is no reason for the average end user to still be using XP.
    A-ha!
    Now we are onto something here! And you are absolutely right. Key word here is average. (Also fixed some of your grammar there. )

    I'm not that, so I guess I still have an excuse to use XP.
    Last edited by momaka; 01-09-2016, 06:12 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • shovenose
    replied
    Re: The 2016 Operating System Thread

    Originally posted by stj View Post
    a lot of embedded xp is out there,
    casino slots, cash machines etc.

    you dont see that stuff being "upgraded" to 7 for the sake of it.
    Right... but that hardware costs a lot of money and would cost massive amounts of money to replace.

    You can get a new computer with Win10 for $250 or a refurbished one with Win7 for $150 and for most people those will be sufficient... so there is no reason for the average end using to still be using XP.

    Leave a comment:


  • stj
    replied
    Re: The 2016 Operating System Thread

    a lot of embedded xp is out there,
    casino slots, cash machines etc.

    you dont see that stuff being "upgraded" to 7 for the sake of it.

    Leave a comment:


  • goodpsusearch
    replied
    Re: The 2016 Operating System Thread

    XP got out in 2001. But TRIM is supported even in XP if you install SSD manufacturer software such as Samsung Magician.

    Leave a comment:


  • SteveNielsen
    replied
    Re: The 2016 Operating System Thread

    Originally posted by diif View Post
    Nobody, that's why XP wasn't so great.
    It doesn't give blowjobs either. Let's not forget about that.

    Leave a comment:


  • SteveNielsen
    replied
    Re: The 2016 Operating System Thread

    You don't need evidence to make up conspiracy bullshit. Yes, bullshit, not theory. Theory has some degree of scientific basis, aka evidence.

    Leave a comment:


  • diif
    replied
    Re: The 2016 Operating System Thread

    Originally posted by goodpsusearch View Post
    Who would install XP on SSD?
    Nobody, that's why XP wasn't so great.

    Leave a comment:


  • goodpsusearch
    replied
    Re: The 2016 Operating System Thread

    Originally posted by diif View Post

    No decent stable 64 bit support, holes like a sieve and no TRIM support for SSDs.
    Who would install XP on SSD?

    XP 64 are stable and decent. The drivers support is not the OS responsibility.
    Last edited by goodpsusearch; 01-09-2016, 05:43 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • momaka
    replied
    Re: The 2016 Operating System Thread

    Originally posted by Stefan Payne View Post
    That there are still 8.2% of Users using an almost 15 Year old operating system wich doesn't get any security updates at all
    Ha! That one made me laugh a bit.

    Do you think security updates fix EVERYTHING? You must be joking if you do. Not every security hole can be patched. And some fixes create even more security holes than before. It just takes time before someone finds the new holes, that's all. Also, it takes time for Microsoft to find and identify security bugs and holes. And then more time to come up with a fix.

    I don't condemn security updates (even if it seems so sometimes), but they are probably the slowest response to a security issue. The best security you got is yourself and a fat hosts file. Even better if you have some kind of hardware firewall. Other than that, your ass is always exposed on the internet and always will be. The real question is how interested are hackers in getting into your PC vs. the next person's, and is it worth the risk?

    Originally posted by Stefan Payne View Post
    - and was a piece of shit to begin with due to the lack of security...
    Right.
    ... because Windows Vista and 7 are impeccable fortresses. Just don't ask me how many of those systems I've seen hosed by stupid viruses and malware. It's the exact same "piece of shit" as the XP days. With a "pretty" GUI, though.

    Originally posted by Stefan Payne View Post
    Thus it's a real great target if you want to infiltrate, so the probability that a XP computer gets infectet when connected to the Interweb is damn high...
    Oh noes! Unplug your computers when you see me typing, because that means my XP systems are about to spread some nasty viruses onto your stuff. .

    Originally posted by Stefan Payne View Post
    But still, why would you use Windows XP today?!
    Because it does the exact same shit that newer OSes do - at least for the things I use it for.

    I'm not saying I would use it for an enterprise or on an entire fleet of company's PCs. But for someone like myself (a decently-educated PC user), it works fine for anything I need it.

    So yes, I will continue to use it until it can't do that anymore. And that probably won't be soon, because I own plenty of old software that's still good for productivity. This old software is not to be confused with modern-day "Apps", many of which aren't really yours.
    Last edited by momaka; 01-09-2016, 05:43 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • diif
    replied
    Re: The 2016 Operating System Thread

    Originally posted by stj View Post
    no, the patches are just fixing shit they break with the previous patch mostly - and i'm not joking.
    Maybe not joking, maybe that's what you actually believe ?
    You don't use Windows, probably don't maintain it for a job and do you read any of the KBs that come with the updates ? Where's your evidence to back up this crazy conspiracy that surely applies to all software and not just MS that you hate ?
    GCHQ and the NSA don't need Microsoft to spy and that would exclude some.

    Originally posted by goodpsusearch View Post
    Windows XP is the greatest OS MS ever made. I would still be using it if it was supported (drivers) on newer PCs. Fortunately there is Windows 7 that is decent.
    No decent stable 64 bit support, holes like a sieve and no TRIM support for SSDs.

    Leave a comment:


  • goodpsusearch
    replied
    Re: The 2016 Operating System Thread

    Windows XP is the greatest OS MS ever made. I would still be using it if it was supported (drivers) on newer PCs. Fortunately there is Windows 7 that is decent.

    Leave a comment:


  • SteveNielsen
    replied
    Re: The 2016 Operating System Thread

    Originally posted by stj View Post
    well if you took *all* the updates then yes, you fixed it, broke it, fixed it, broke it, and turned it into a government agent spying on you.
    LOL! You're getting better at this.

    Don't get too cocky tho. People who get too cocky stop trying and then it gets boring.

    Leave a comment:


  • stj
    replied
    Re: The 2016 Operating System Thread

    well if you took *all* the updates then yes, you fixed it, broke it, fixed it, broke it, and turned it into a government agent spying on you.

    Leave a comment:


  • shovenose
    replied
    Re: The 2016 Operating System Thread

    Originally posted by stj View Post
    no, the patches are just fixing shit they break with the previous patch mostly - and i'm not joking.
    By your reason Windows 7 is garbage because it has 250+ updates on a fresh install??

    Yet I have had 0 BSOD or freezes on my primary desktops or laptops that I can remember, despite those 250+ updates.

    Leave a comment:


  • stj
    replied
    Re: The 2016 Operating System Thread

    no, the patches are just fixing shit they break with the previous patch mostly - and i'm not joking.

    Leave a comment:


  • diif
    replied
    Re: The 2016 Operating System Thread

    Originally posted by stj View Post
    if they have not fixed there own bugs wihin the first year - they never will.
    We must all be imagining the regular patches for Windows 7 then, and all of the patches from the other software vendors.

    Leave a comment:


  • stj
    replied
    Re: The 2016 Operating System Thread

    if they have not fixed there own bugs wihin the first year - they never will.

    Leave a comment:


  • eccerr0r
    replied
    Re: The 2016 Operating System Thread

    However bugs they initially created are better fixed by them - if they have a buffer overflow problem, it's better they fix that than have antivirus make sure that overflow does not get exploited. These would be simply bandages over a real problem.

    Leave a comment:


  • stj
    replied
    Re: The 2016 Operating System Thread

    Originally posted by Stefan Payne View Post
    That there are still 8.2% of Users using an almost 15 Year old operating system wich doesn't get any security updates at all
    security - real security, does not come from microsoft.
    malware-bytes etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • Stefan Payne
    replied
    Re: The 2016 Operating System Thread

    Originally posted by Per Hansson View Post
    Depends on what's worrying you
    That there are still 8.2% of Users using an almost 15 Year old operating system wich doesn't get any security updates at all - and was a piece of shit to begin with due to the lack of security...

    Thus it's a real great target if you want to infiltrate, so the probability that a XP computer gets infectet when connected to the Interweb is damn high...

    Well, most of nowadays infections are due to users stupidity...

    But still, why would you use Windows XP today?!
    For gods sake, use Linux or update to a newer Windows...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X