Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Recommended STABLE Motherboard?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ratdude747
    replied
    Re: Recommended STABLE Motherboard?

    i had a tyan with bad caps... it was what brought me to the forums in the first place. too bad I split a trace like a dummy... i had no idea what i was doing back then. stupid canicons.

    it was old though... early pIII

    Leave a comment:


  • Topcat
    replied
    Re: Recommended STABLE Motherboard?

    ^
    I like Tyan boards, I've had good luck with them as well. I'm more partial to supermicro, but I've never had a tyan that gave me any grief beyond the occasional one I'd have to recap (they use KZG's frequently).

    Leave a comment:


  • mockingbird
    replied
    Re: Recommended STABLE Motherboard?

    Ok, I will keep this in mind. My views are not unswayable. I will definitely put their stuff back in my list for 1U and 2U rackmount builds. What do you guys think about Tyan?

    Leave a comment:


  • acstech
    replied
    Re: Recommended STABLE Motherboard?

    I used to recommend Biostar. Their boards several years ago when they were using the Award bios, worked very well in spite of the OST caps. After they switched to the AMI bios, they would develop little problems here and there.

    That's when I switched to Gigabyte, in particular the UD series. I've tried MSI too, and it worked fine. I just like the idea of all solid caps.

    Leave a comment:


  • Topcat
    replied
    Re: Recommended STABLE Motherboard?

    ^
    SM support was great for me as well. I had a BIOS problem with my latest system, it wouldn't go past POST with my 3ware SATA2 raid controller, would just hang. After exhausting all the usual troubleshooting techniques, I called their support. There was a BIOS revision for the board that wasn't released to the website yet. The rep emailed it to me, I flashed the BIOS, problem was cured. Took 10 minutes. It would take that long just get through the switchboard of any other board maker....and then sit on hold for a rep, and pray he/she spoke understandable English. The rep I spoke to spoke fluent English. Their call center is in California, not India.

    Leave a comment:


  • Toasty
    replied
    Re: Recommended STABLE Motherboard?

    Funny, SM's customer service was super to me...

    ...and, they spoke ENGLISH !!!

    >>but some of the Supermicro stuff has Sanyo electrolytics <<

    Some??

    I don't trust NE's reviews. Mostly crapola reviews (read: useless) and sometimes it seems the negatives are put up by other manufacturers reps.

    Leave a comment:


  • mockingbird
    replied
    Re: Recommended STABLE Motherboard?

    Originally posted by Topcat View Post
    False. I have never seen one with KZG caps.....maybe the photo was that of a test board or engineering sample, manufacturers are known for that. Mine always had Sanyo WG's. My more recent ones are all polymer. I've been running SM boards for all my servers for over a decade, never had one fail. Some of which have been in 24/7/365 service for over 7 years. Can't say the same for MSI... SM boards are built for the high-end workstation and IT/server market, its not the cheap gamer shit for the kiddies. So what will you be attacking next?
    I was just working on a quote for some high end 1U/2U servers, and I was looking through NewEgg for server boards. You're right, it was the Asus boards with the KZG caps, but some of the Supermicro stuff has Sanyo electrolytics (Yes, I'm aware Sanyo is reliable).

    Go to NewEgg and look through Supermicro's stuff. A lot of it has too much negative feedback and customer service horror stories.

    I like their boards - I think having audio and no parallel/com or USB ports is not for me - and I like the fact that some of their stuff has parallel/com ports, but people complain about those.

    Leave a comment:


  • yyonline
    replied
    Re: Recommended STABLE Motherboard?

    Even recent Intel aren't safe from KZG/KZJ.

    Has anybody seen recently made KZG fail? I'm sure UCC can't be unaware of the reliability issues... I'm curious if they ever fixed the series, even if they never admitted it had issues. Since Rubycon is discontinuing MBZ/MCZ I suspect we'll see KZG popping up on more boards. So far, my initial observations seem to support this.

    I've started seeing Samxon on some Intel boards...mostly GP stuff in non-stress areas.

    I used to use abit, but they started using cheap caps after they were bought out by universal scientific. Their high end stuff was still safe though. Of course, they're not around any more.

    A recent Athlon build I did with an all-solid MSI board had entirely Nichicon FP caps. Gigabyte likes to use Sanyo polymer on their all-solid boards, from what I can tell. Asus boards are a grab bag, even with solid caps.

    I haven't seen any solid polymer caps fail, even those from Chinese/Taiwanese brands.

    Leave a comment:


  • 370forlife
    replied
    Re: Recommended STABLE Motherboard?

    I recommend biostars as decent budget boards. Their Tpower and Tforce typically have all UCC solids, UCC solids on VRM with UCC/OST lytics everywhere else. Their other series usually have UCC lytics in the critical areas like VRM, near ram slots, and lower value caps are OST.

    For a good solid build that needs to be put together once, and not touched for years I recommend supermicro or intel.

    For someone who wants to game with a higher budget, I recommend gigabyte or intel boards.

    Leave a comment:


  • toastygoodness
    replied
    Re: Recommended STABLE Motherboard?

    Originally posted by 370forlife View Post
    Nissan...
    probably....

    Leave a comment:


  • toastygoodness
    replied
    Re: Recommended STABLE Motherboard?

    Originally posted by Topcat View Post
    Anything Supermicro.

    /thread
    seconded. supermicros are the most stable AND they use solid state caps. at least anything past socket 478. they are probably some of the best boards in the business.

    Leave a comment:


  • c_hegge
    replied
    Re: Recommended STABLE Motherboard?

    I've only seen a few Biostar boards in the past. All had Only Some Trash caps

    Leave a comment:


  • everell
    replied
    Re: Recommended STABLE Motherboard?

    I have always had good luck with Biostar. I am presently running the T Power 4 U with AMD64 socket 939. I don't know what they have for more current boards. Perhaps the mocker would like to mock Biostar.

    Leave a comment:


  • ratdude747
    replied
    Re: Recommended STABLE Motherboard?

    Originally posted by Topcat View Post
    False. I have never seen one with KZG caps.....maybe the photo was that of a test board or engineering sample, manufacturers are known for that. Mine always had Sanyo WG's. My more recent ones are all polymer. I've been running SM boards for all my servers for over a decade, never had one fail. Some of which have been in 24/7/365 service for over 7 years. Can't say the same for MSI... SM boards are built for the high-end workstation and IT/server market, its not the cheap gamer shit for the kiddies. So what will you be attacking next?
    agreed... the one in my dad's desktop (PDSGE) is a mix of sanyo and poly. the only issue was a rather warm northbridge cooler, fixed by adding a fan to a dimension 2400 cooler and swapping (i now have a dell with a supermicro heatsink, LOL). otherwise it has been nice to me... had i not moved to non-netburst equipment i would still be rocking it personally.

    i wonder who is next on mockingbird's hit list?

    Leave a comment:


  • 370forlife
    replied
    Re: Recommended STABLE Motherboard?

    Originally posted by Topcat View Post
    So what will you be attacking next?
    Nissan...

    Leave a comment:


  • Topcat
    replied
    Re: Recommended STABLE Motherboard?

    Originally posted by mockingbird View Post
    Supermicro boards have a high failure rate. Just look at the Newegg closeups and see why. They are using KZG caps.
    False. I have never seen one with KZG caps.....maybe the photo was that of a test board or engineering sample, manufacturers are known for that. Mine always had Sanyo WG's. My more recent ones are all polymer. I've been running SM boards for all my servers for over a decade, never had one fail. Some of which have been in 24/7/365 service for over 7 years. Can't say the same for MSI... SM boards are built for the high-end workstation and IT/server market, its not the cheap gamer shit for the kiddies. So what will you be attacking next?

    Leave a comment:


  • Toasty
    replied
    Re: Recommended STABLE Motherboard?

    Originally posted by Topcat View Post
    Anything Supermicro.
    Yup!

    Originally posted by mockingbird View Post
    Supermicro boards have a high failure rate. Just look at the Newegg closeups and see why. They are using KZG caps.
    My Supermicro C2SBA is 98% Sanyo's including poly's on the CPU and 3 Ruby MBZ's on VRM in.

    Leave a comment:


  • mockingbird
    replied
    Re: Recommended STABLE Motherboard?

    Rampage has the VIA audio, stay away.

    Gigabyte... Make sure you get what you see in the picture. Different revisions of the same board have been known to use different socket types. I don't like Gigabyte. My favourite is MSI. Probably not the best quality component-wise, but I always find their BIOS the most feature rich.

    Leave a comment:


  • EvilCensor
    replied
    Re: Recommended STABLE Motherboard?

    The Gigabyte mobo mentioned above has the Lotes brand of socket you mention:



    The image in this post doesn't seem to display - perhaps a permission issue -> http://www.links.co.jp/items/high_gax58ud3r_01.jpg

    I was considering the ASUS Rampage - would that be a bad choice?
    Last edited by EvilCensor; 01-04-2011, 03:50 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • c_hegge
    replied
    Re: Recommended STABLE Motherboard?

    DFI is my prefferred brand. I think they use lotes sockets. I despise ASUS

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X