1n5819 rectifier replace with 1n4007 rectifier??

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • senz_90
    Badcaps Veteran
    • Aug 2013
    • 328
    • Indonesia

    #1

    1n5819 rectifier replace with 1n4007 rectifier??

    just a simple dumb question. 5 hours ago i just getting a psu that really "new" from my friend. i think those are used just for about 2-3 months before failed. It hasn't even a hair of dust insidely !! so i just open the case and looking for the culprits, smelling and looking round and i notices one diode has burned on the board. so i checks it in circuit. it has low reading resistance both forward and reverse. desoldering it and see the diode is 1n5819. i have a 1n4007 on my box same amperege as those diode, trying to replace it and get a good result. but the question, it is dangerous for my cpu if i using those 1n4007 instead 1n5819 in the psu to powering my psu? also it could long last? yes i have download the datasheet already, but i didn't know exactly, i think the expert one on repairing usually know about universal replacement parts. any short answer appreciated. thank you
    "There is no shortcut to be successful. No pain, no gain."

    Best Regards
    Rudi
    Thank You
  • tom66
    EVs Rule
    • Apr 2011
    • 32560
    • UK

    #2
    Re: 1n5819 rectifier replace with 1n4007 rectifier??

    1N5819 is a fast, low loss, schottky rectifier.
    1N4007 Is a slow, high loss, silicon rectifier.

    No, you cannot. The 1N4007 will likely last a few minutes before failure, probably less.
    Please do not PM me with questions! Questions via PM will not be answered. Post on the forums instead!
    For service manual, schematic, boardview (board view), datasheet, cad - use our search.

    Comment

    • senz_90
      Badcaps Veteran
      • Aug 2013
      • 328
      • Indonesia

      #3
      Re: 1n5819 rectifier replace with 1n4007 rectifier??

      Originally posted by tom66
      1N5819 is a fast, low loss, schottky rectifier.
      1N4007 Is a slow, high loss, silicon rectifier.

      No, you cannot. The 1N4007 will likely last a few minutes before failure, probably less.
      i just powering her about 2-3 minutes because fear of damage anythings. her is almost looks like a new PSU.

      thank you for your kind answer
      "There is no shortcut to be successful. No pain, no gain."

      Best Regards
      Rudi
      Thank You

      Comment

      • PeteS in CA
        Badcaps Legend
        • Aug 2005
        • 3581
        • USA, Unsure of Planet

        #4
        Re: 1n5819 rectifier replace with 1n4007 rectifier??

        A 1N5819 is a 1A, 40V Schottky rectifier; its V(f) at 1A is .6V, and it is very fast. A 1N4007 is a 1A, 1000V standard recovery rectifier; its V(f) at 1A is 1V, and its reverse recovery time is ~920nS. If the circuit in the P/S requires either the lower forward drop or the very fast reverse recovery time, a 1N4007 will fail pretty quickly, though it may take more than a few minutes. I strongly recommend that you replace that 1N4007 with a 1A-3A, 40V-60V Schottky rectifier, as I don't think the circuit designer would specify a Schottky rectifier without a reason.
        PeteS in CA

        Power Supplies should be boring: No loud noises, no bright flashes, and no bad smells.
        ****************************
        To kill personal responsibility, initiative or success, punish it by taxing it. To encourage irresponsibility, improvidence, dependence and failure, reward it by subsidizing it.
        ****************************

        Comment

        • senz_90
          Badcaps Veteran
          • Aug 2013
          • 328
          • Indonesia

          #5
          Re: 1n5819 rectifier replace with 1n4007 rectifier??

          Originally posted by PeteS in CA
          A 1N5819 is a 1A, 40V Schottky rectifier; its V(f) at 1A is .6V, and it is very fast. A 1N4007 is a 1A, 1000V standard recovery rectifier; its V(f) at 1A is 1V, and its reverse recovery time is ~920nS. If the circuit in the P/S requires either the lower forward drop or the very fast reverse recovery time, a 1N4007 will fail pretty quickly, though it may take more than a few minutes. I strongly recommend that you replace that 1N4007 with a 1A-3A, 40V-60V Schottky rectifier, as I don't think the circuit designer would specify a Schottky rectifier without a reason.
          I will changes it and make sure didn't turn it on until get a right component. i have think same as you before that designer inserting schottky rectifier without a reason, but my knowledge isn't good enough about this ,because im not an electrical student.
          "There is no shortcut to be successful. No pain, no gain."

          Best Regards
          Rudi
          Thank You

          Comment

          • eccerr0r
            Solder Sloth
            • Nov 2012
            • 8701
            • USA

            #6
            Re: 1n5819 rectifier replace with 1n4007 rectifier??

            I have seen some switching PSUs use a 1N4007 in the secondary to feed the SMPS chip. Bad, but surprised it worked. I guess the low current requirements may let it work (milliamperes) but I was surprised that the reverse recovery time was fast enough.

            If you had an UF4007 instead, these probably are better for replacing a 1N5819, but even these are a terrible replacement due to the Vf drop being higher.

            Comment

            • PeteS in CA
              Badcaps Legend
              • Aug 2005
              • 3581
              • USA, Unsure of Planet

              #7
              Re: 1n5819 rectifier replace with 1n4007 rectifier??

              I'm guessing a UF4007 is a 1A, 1000V ultra-fast - 25-50nS reverse recovery time. Fast, but probably a 1.2V-1.5V V(f) at 1A.
              PeteS in CA

              Power Supplies should be boring: No loud noises, no bright flashes, and no bad smells.
              ****************************
              To kill personal responsibility, initiative or success, punish it by taxing it. To encourage irresponsibility, improvidence, dependence and failure, reward it by subsidizing it.
              ****************************

              Comment

              • senz_90
                Badcaps Veteran
                • Aug 2013
                • 328
                • Indonesia

                #8
                Re: 1n5819 rectifier replace with 1n4007 rectifier??

                Originally posted by eccerr0r
                I have seen some switching PSUs use a 1N4007 in the secondary to feed the SMPS chip. Bad, but surprised it worked. I guess the low current requirements may let it work (milliamperes) but I was surprised that the reverse recovery time was fast enough.

                If you had an UF4007 instead, these probably are better for replacing a 1N5819, but even these are a terrible replacement due to the Vf drop being higher.
                Originally posted by PeteS in CA
                I'm guessing a UF4007 is a 1A, 1000V ultra-fast - 25-50nS reverse recovery time. Fast, but probably a 1.2V-1.5V V(f) at 1A.
                i have FR107 on my store box, but didn't know it match or not, im just too busy on my college, maybe tomorrow i'll buy it. thank you for suggest
                "There is no shortcut to be successful. No pain, no gain."

                Best Regards
                Rudi
                Thank You

                Comment

                • Escort Eagle
                  Senior Member
                  • Jul 2012
                  • 110
                  • USA

                  #9
                  Re: 1n5819 rectifier replace with 1n4007 rectifier??

                  Use FR107 . I have used many but still no complains back !!

                  Comment

                  • eccerr0r
                    Solder Sloth
                    • Nov 2012
                    • 8701
                    • USA

                    #10
                    Re: 1n5819 rectifier replace with 1n4007 rectifier??

                    FR107 is probably more similar to UF4007 (might be a clone actually) than the 1N5819.

                    Comment

                    • tom66
                      EVs Rule
                      • Apr 2011
                      • 32560
                      • UK

                      #11
                      Re: 1n5819 rectifier replace with 1n4007 rectifier??

                      Yes it's less efficient and if the 1N5819 failed in a short time then the UF4007 will faster but at least it will work for a quick test.
                      Please do not PM me with questions! Questions via PM will not be answered. Post on the forums instead!
                      For service manual, schematic, boardview (board view), datasheet, cad - use our search.

                      Comment

                      • PeteS in CA
                        Badcaps Legend
                        • Aug 2005
                        • 3581
                        • USA, Unsure of Planet

                        #12
                        Re: 1n5819 rectifier replace with 1n4007 rectifier??

                        A standard recovery rectifier (e.g. 1N4007) has a 50%-70% higher v(f) than a schottky (i.e. higher loss when conducting); it also switches off slower, so it also has higher losses when switching. The latter losses become increasingly significant as the frequency being switched increases (i.e. not significant at 50Hz or 60Hz, but critical at SMPS frequencies).

                        An ultrafast has a V(f) ~20% higher than a standard recovery rectifier, and 80%-100% higher than a schottky. So I think an ultrafast would probably last longer than a standard recovery rectifier, but overheating is certainly possible, and other things might suffer (e.g. efficiency, cross-regulation, low-line regulation).
                        PeteS in CA

                        Power Supplies should be boring: No loud noises, no bright flashes, and no bad smells.
                        ****************************
                        To kill personal responsibility, initiative or success, punish it by taxing it. To encourage irresponsibility, improvidence, dependence and failure, reward it by subsidizing it.
                        ****************************

                        Comment

                        • senz_90
                          Badcaps Veteran
                          • Aug 2013
                          • 328
                          • Indonesia

                          #13
                          Re: 1n5819 rectifier replace with 1n4007 rectifier??

                          wow. i dont even hope could get any answer for this dumb question. smps frequency using a high frequency maybe around kHz-MHz as i know if not wrong, so it must to be consider when using the rectifier (different with linear psu that almost same as mains frequency) and guess what? i dont have good enough knowledge about the rights replacement.haha. btw i have fixed her and her running well now, thank you for all of kind (especially the friend those kindly give me)
                          i had learn much from this forum.
                          Last edited by senz_90; 10-22-2013, 02:17 PM.
                          "There is no shortcut to be successful. No pain, no gain."

                          Best Regards
                          Rudi
                          Thank You

                          Comment

                          • ossdr
                            New Member
                            • May 2015
                            • 7
                            • amman

                            #14
                            Re: 1n5819 rectifier replace with 1n4007 rectifier??

                            hi , you can use BYS21 OR BYV10---40 OR SB140

                            Comment

                            Related Topics

                            Collapse

                            • howardc64
                              QN75QN85BAFXZA no backlight
                              by howardc64
                              2+ year old TV with many (720? 65" version has 720) mini LED dimming zones. TV boots, has sound, panel picture can be seen with flashlight. No backlight. No TV model sticker on rear panel (Maybe Samsung service removed it, read below). Found the model # through the PSU and zoned LED driver board numbers.

                              PSU has a click near LED output circuit at 1 second interval, sounded like the 4x barrier rectifier area. Protective pastic liner under PSU shows heat signature on the Schottky Barrier Rectifier in this circuit. Found a shorted diode (2 diode per rectifier, failed rectifier labled...
                              07-03-2025, 05:08 PM
                            • jordanaudio1
                              Samsung TV UN60KU6270F power supply
                              by jordanaudio1
                              Trying to learn electronics repair as a hobby. I have no formal training in electronics, circuits, etc. Everything I know, which isn't much, has been learned from watching youtube videos, reading books, forums, etc. This means, sometimes I have a hard time understanding and interpreting what's important when I look at datasheets, and such.

                              My brother has a TV that I'm working on now. He said he was watching it, he heard a loud pop and it went off. I used my DMM to check the fuse, it was blown. From watching lots of hours of electronics repairs on youtube, I figured that was just a...
                              07-07-2025, 07:38 PM
                            • nobbnobb1
                              Bose Acoustimass 10 IV Subwoofer No Sound. Help with burnt component identification?
                              by nobbnobb1
                              I picked up this used Bose Acoustimass 10 IV speaker system. Speakers seem to work fine, but the subwoofer does not make any noise. So I took apart the unit and found some obviously failed (burnt) components:

                              - 1x 3.14 A @ 250V main circuit fuse
                              - 1x bridge rectifier GBU601. there's actually two of these on the board, one is obviously burnt and the other does not seem to have any anomalies like shorts. However I figure may as well replace both.
                              - 2x diode. This is tricky because the only markings I see on it are: "617 402". No current rating or anything else....
                              11-16-2024, 09:56 PM
                            • howardc64
                              LG 65UQ8000AUB no backlight burning smell
                              by howardc64
                              Only 3 years old. Owner said backlight went out and burning smell. Didn't bother plugging in to check if had power LED. Just opened the TV rear and found shorted bridge rectifier diode on the backlight circuit on the PSU. SF26G (400V 2A super fast recovery rectifier link ) diode replace with SF26 (what I had on hand) Google AI said G = Green Components.

                              Burn looked pretty bad on the board but just was blackened carbon coating material. Scraped and cleaned off quite well and clean solder pad for the new diode.


                              ...
                              06-07-2025, 10:38 PM
                            • iMuhtaseb
                              A2681 Keyboard, trackpad and sleep?!
                              by iMuhtaseb
                              Wow it's been a while since I posted!

                              This is a weird case, it has a history of liquid spill a year ago but customer did not want to replace neither trackpad or keyboard.. fast forward for today:

                              A2681 turns on but not trackpad or keyboard feedback (or external keyboard and mouse) and then after a minute or so the Mac sleeps..

                              It's a NOT a sleep sensor or trackpad or keyboard or daughterboard or anything else (I replaced all those); it's the logic board..

                              Tested another locked logic board on customer's top case and it posted with keyboard and...
                              05-22-2025, 09:59 AM
                            • Loading...
                            • No more items.
                            Working...