New PSU Spec from Intel

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CAD4466HK
    Member
    • Sep 2006
    • 43

    #1

    New PSU Spec from Intel

    WTF?
    Attached Files
    MSI K8N Diamond Plus SLIx16
    3700+ Sandy E4 245x11@2695 1.47v
    Zalman 7000bcu w/AS5
    2GB KHX PC-4000 3-4-4-8-1T
    eVGA 7900GT KO 600/1600 (3RD RMA)
    2xWD SATA1 80GB RAID 0 16KB/16KB
    Lite-On SOHC-5232K
    Lite-On SOHW-1693S
    SB X-FI 9000 Extream Gamer 64mb
    Antec Neopower 480 v2.0 (with sleaved cables 18&18@36amps
    Antec P180
  • yanz
    Badcaps Veteran
    • Nov 2004
    • 910

    #2
    Re: New PSU Spec from Intel

    single voltage rail is a good idea

    after googling for "smps vs linear psu" and read lots of pages i come to conclusion that it would be better if we only use single rail smps. (ok that's only my opinion).
    days are so short when you actually do something..

    Comment

    • gonzo0815
      Badcaps Legend
      • Feb 2006
      • 1600

      #3
      Re: New PSU Spec from Intel

      Well, where i can buy the right model?
      Oh yes, i know it is easy, but i have to build it for my self.
      Isa there any easy step by step instruction?

      Comment

      • jonnyGURU
        Badcaps Veteran
        • Feb 2006
        • 244
        • United States

        #4
        Re: New PSU Spec from Intel

        Not really.

        I have these slides from the IDF.

        This is in regards to Google bitching about their servers costing so much to power.

        A single rail PSU would be more efficient in size and easier to cool because of this, and it is possible to make it more energy efficient, but while components are still requiring different voltages, additional DC to DC "point of power" converters will be needed.

        So let's say you make a single 12V rail PSU and it's 85% to 90% efficient. You're still going to need to regulate voltage down to 3.3V for RAM, 5V for logic, etc. So we use mini point of power DC to DC power supplies. These can be 90% to 95% efficient. 90% of 90% is 81%. You're now LESS efficient than you were with a single multi-rail PSU.

        I do agree with them on UPS's. Especially the Online UPS's that they use in the Google server farm and illustrate in one of the slides from the IDF. You're converting AC to DC to AC and then go to the PSU where you're converting back to DC. Why not just make the UPS AC to DC and then use a DC to DC power supply in the PC? Wouldn't that makes more sense????
        Rest in peace BFG. You were... a job...

        Comment

        • PeteS in CA
          Badcaps Legend
          • Aug 2005
          • 3579
          • USA, Unsure of Planet

          #5
          Re: New PSU Spec from Intel

          You could plug a SMPS set for 230VAC into 250-300VDC and run it.
          PeteS in CA

          Power Supplies should be boring: No loud noises, no bright flashes, and no bad smells.
          ****************************
          To kill personal responsibility, initiative or success, punish it by taxing it. To encourage irresponsibility, improvidence, dependence and failure, reward it by subsidizing it.
          ****************************

          Comment

          • arneson
            Badcaps Legend
            • Sep 2005
            • 1267

            #6
            Re: New PSU Spec from Intel

            There are DC only server room designs being tested, but in the end you only save on air conditioning.
            Jim

            Comment

            • yanz
              Badcaps Veteran
              • Nov 2004
              • 910

              #7
              Re: New PSU Spec from Intel

              So let's say you make a single 12V rail PSU and it's 85% to 90% efficient. You're still going to need to regulate voltage down to 3.3V for RAM, 5V for logic, etc. So we use mini point of power DC to DC power supplies. These can be 90% to 95% efficient. 90% of 90% is 81%. You're now LESS efficient than you were with a single multi-rail PSU.
              That is the key, then. Lets's have some regulator/vrm for those two lower voltages on the motherboard, like the old days (when psu didn't have 3.3v yet).

              How much is the efficiency on usual cpu vrm on motherboards? (12v -> ~1.5v)
              days are so short when you actually do something..

              Comment

              • yanz
                Badcaps Veteran
                • Nov 2004
                • 910

                #8
                Re: New PSU Spec from Intel

                i mean, maybe it can make sense if the whole platform changed too.
                days are so short when you actually do something..

                Comment

                • jonnyGURU
                  Badcaps Veteran
                  • Feb 2006
                  • 244
                  • United States

                  #9
                  Re: New PSU Spec from Intel

                  Originally posted by yanz
                  That is the key, then. Lets's have some regulator/vrm for those two lower voltages on the motherboard, like the old days (when psu didn't have 3.3v yet).

                  How much is the efficiency on usual cpu vrm on motherboards? (12v -> ~1.5v)
                  Still not 100%. Around 90 to 95%. That's going to add up and you're over all efficiency is only going to be 80 to 85%.
                  Rest in peace BFG. You were... a job...

                  Comment

                  • gonzo0815
                    Badcaps Legend
                    • Feb 2006
                    • 1600

                    #10
                    Re: New PSU Spec from Intel

                    You can use independent 300v to 12&3v converters. I have seen a step down converter redy build for 6€. It is a 300v DC input to 5v /40A op. Tis was from an surpluss shop. I have thought to buy one and build it in my Amacrox Free Earth after the APFC section, so i can the PSu modding to only sinlge 12v rail and the 3,3v i can generate from the 12v line, as it wouldn`t used that mutch in todays equipment. This would be a cool mod

                    Comment

                    Related Topics

                    Collapse

                    Working...