A friend give me an LG 50PC3D-UD (PDP50X30010) plasma TV for repair. The TV would turn on and the green front panel lamp would blink three times, then the power supply would go into some sort of protect mode and shut down. This happened irrespective of what connectors I had plugged into the supply. I started measuring voltages and all low voltages checked out (5v-Standby, 3.3v, both 5v rails, 6v, 12v, and 19v). In the high voltage section, the HorizontalGrid Voltage (VS) was reading 0v (should be 196v according to the service manual) and the Vertical Grid Voltage (VA) was reading 60v.
Based partially off of a suggestion in this thread I checked all MOSFETS and located Q855, a shorted SD20N60 power MOSFET. Upon removing this FET, it showed continuity to the source (S), gate (G), drain (D), while Q854 (same part) passed the "finger" test (touch a finger between source and gate after the gate has been charged). I ordered a replacement from Coppell and installed it. TV In addition to this, I replaced all bloated capacitors with Panasonic FM equivalents. Nine in total.
Now, with the power supply on my bench and my trusty fluke at my side, when I apply the 5v standby to the RL-ON (relay on) the power supply relays engage. I am then able to apply 5v to the M5V-ON and 3.3-ON pins and can verify that all low voltages are in spec. When I engage the high voltage section by applying 5v to the VS-ON pin, the power supply goes into protect mode only a moment later. I am able to read exactly 60v on VA, but now VS jumps past the 196V mark until the powers supply kicks into protect mode around 217v. I have tried adjusting the VS adjustment potentiometer to no avail.
Does anyone have any ideas? the manual entitled " lg_50pc1dr_troubleshooting_manual.pdf" has been of great help, but it does not have a full schematic for the power supply section. I read that a failed MOSFET can sometimes burn up the drive section, but this section seems to be protected with a zener diode (admittedly, I don't fully understand all principles involved as electronics are just a hobby of mine). There are two identical drive circuits in this section of the power supply (one for Q854 and one for Q855) and all components in them test out the same with a diode test, but I did not remove any of their components to test them. A Motorola MC33067P controls this circuit. Everything looks good upon visual inspection. Photos can be uploaded if need be.
Any thoughts would be appreciated!
Based partially off of a suggestion in this thread I checked all MOSFETS and located Q855, a shorted SD20N60 power MOSFET. Upon removing this FET, it showed continuity to the source (S), gate (G), drain (D), while Q854 (same part) passed the "finger" test (touch a finger between source and gate after the gate has been charged). I ordered a replacement from Coppell and installed it. TV In addition to this, I replaced all bloated capacitors with Panasonic FM equivalents. Nine in total.
Now, with the power supply on my bench and my trusty fluke at my side, when I apply the 5v standby to the RL-ON (relay on) the power supply relays engage. I am then able to apply 5v to the M5V-ON and 3.3-ON pins and can verify that all low voltages are in spec. When I engage the high voltage section by applying 5v to the VS-ON pin, the power supply goes into protect mode only a moment later. I am able to read exactly 60v on VA, but now VS jumps past the 196V mark until the powers supply kicks into protect mode around 217v. I have tried adjusting the VS adjustment potentiometer to no avail.
Does anyone have any ideas? the manual entitled " lg_50pc1dr_troubleshooting_manual.pdf" has been of great help, but it does not have a full schematic for the power supply section. I read that a failed MOSFET can sometimes burn up the drive section, but this section seems to be protected with a zener diode (admittedly, I don't fully understand all principles involved as electronics are just a hobby of mine). There are two identical drive circuits in this section of the power supply (one for Q854 and one for Q855) and all components in them test out the same with a diode test, but I did not remove any of their components to test them. A Motorola MC33067P controls this circuit. Everything looks good upon visual inspection. Photos can be uploaded if need be.
Any thoughts would be appreciated!
Comment