Daytek F19AH

Collapse
X
Collapse
+ More Options
Latest Activity
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • osoduro
    replied
    Re: Daytek F19AH

    Hi guys I'm new in the forum ,but I do have daytek f19dh and come black scrim the green light still on and come yellow when the pc go sleep ,if I push the button on the side on-off the scrim buck on for couple of second and go dark again what could I do to make it work ? I appreciate any answers about that issue thank's
    Attached Files
    Last edited by osoduro; 05-04-2011, 09:34 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • jetadm123
    replied
    Re: Daytek F19AH

    Excellent work! Glad you kept at it! Too bad about the ceramic caps. Also, we now know of at least a substitute mosfet that will work on your board. Keep up the good work.

    Leave a comment:


  • PlainBill
    replied
    Re: Daytek F19AH

    Originally posted by UserName666
    And the result is......Daytek = Fixed....BenQ = Fixed I am back to dual monitors!!! HUGE improvement over the single IBM C51 lol

    BenQ was a walk in the park because there was a previous thread on that monitor that explained the problem as well as a protection circuit. https://www.badcaps.net/forum/showthread.php?t=4304 When I get another LCD I am gonna take the BenQ down and have a stab at the protection circuit.

    As for the Daytek, this has been hell and back lol. The 471k caps I ordered, I tested 4 and they all turned out to be 29nf so maybe I got a bad batch IDK but I left the current ones in there, put in the new D444's, lifted 2 solder pads in the process, and got so happy that it worked I forgot to switch out the Radio Shack caps and order Panasonics. Oh well the Daytek is done, it's working and and I'm gonna follow the whole if it ain't broke don't fix it thing for now. If anything happens to the Daytek for forgetting to change those caps I know where to look now.

    I usually shut my monitors off at night but my test for them both is I am going to leave them both on for the next 2 days straight.

    I have also now ordered that Repair LCD monitors book off the net and it looks like it has some GREAT info in it.

    Thank you to everyone who has helped me out with this monitor especially PlainBill and jetadm123. Gonna start flippin' through that book but it's a given I will hit another snag along the way & I'll be back so until then.......
    Congratulations!!! It's scant consolation, but the repairs that have you tearing your hair out are the ones that teach you the most.

    PlainBill

    Leave a comment:


  • UserName666
    replied
    Re: Daytek F19AH

    And the result is......Daytek = Fixed....BenQ = Fixed I am back to dual monitors!!! HUGE improvement over the single IBM C51 lol

    BenQ was a walk in the park because there was a previous thread on that monitor that explained the problem as well as a protection circuit. https://www.badcaps.net/forum/showthread.php?t=4304 When I get another LCD I am gonna take the BenQ down and have a stab at the protection circuit.

    As for the Daytek, this has been hell and back lol. The 471k caps I ordered, I tested 4 and they all turned out to be 29nf so maybe I got a bad batch IDK but I left the current ones in there, put in the new D444's, lifted 2 solder pads in the process, and got so happy that it worked I forgot to switch out the Radio Shack caps and order Panasonics. Oh well the Daytek is done, it's working and and I'm gonna follow the whole if it ain't broke don't fix it thing for now. If anything happens to the Daytek for forgetting to change those caps I know where to look now.

    I usually shut my monitors off at night but my test for them both is I am going to leave them both on for the next 2 days straight.

    I have also now ordered that Repair LCD monitors book off the net and it looks like it has some GREAT info in it.

    Thank you to everyone who has helped me out with this monitor especially PlainBill and jetadm123. Gonna start flippin' through that book but it's a given I will hit another snag along the way & I'll be back so until then.......
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • PlainBill
    replied
    Re: Daytek F19AH

    Originally posted by UserName666
    I will get some of those caps along with the D444. Both those are readily available on ebay.

    (Off topic)
    I just cracked open a benq monitor today with no backlight.
    There is actually a repair *KIT* available on ebay for this one

    http://cgi.ebay.com/REPAIR-KIT-2SC57...item3355ff711b

    I also found a complete service manual for the BenQ in less than 5 minutes.

    If only this Daytek was that simple lol
    The big problem with the Daytek occurred back in post 46 where we failed to recognize that the output resistance was too low. If we had caught the problem then this thread would have been much shorter.

    As far as repairing monitors is concerned, the parts kits are the equivalent of the 'paint by number' sets. They are good for getting a working monitor PROVIDED the fault is the common failure, but they sure don't teach you much.

    PlainBill

    Leave a comment:


  • UserName666
    replied
    Re: Daytek F19AH

    I will get some of those caps along with the D444. Both those are readily available on ebay.

    (Off topic)
    I just cracked open a benq monitor today with no backlight.
    There is actually a repair *KIT* available on ebay for this one

    http://cgi.ebay.com/REPAIR-KIT-2SC57...item3355ff711b

    I also found a complete service manual for the BenQ in less than 5 minutes.

    If only this Daytek was that simple lol

    Leave a comment:


  • jetadm123
    replied
    Re: Daytek F19AH

    Since the two ceramic caps are out of spec, I would go ahead and add those two to your list. 0.47nf @ 1000 volts.

    Leave a comment:


  • UserName666
    replied
    Re: Daytek F19AH

    It would appear they are

    Leave a comment:


  • jetadm123
    replied
    Re: Daytek F19AH

    I forgot to ask if the resistors and caps that you just tested were connected to the inverter transistors (4060AL).

    Leave a comment:


  • UserName666
    replied
    Re: Daytek F19AH

    Originally posted by jetadm123
    471k = 470pf = .47nf where "k" = +/- 10% tolerance. Your measured values seem a little low, but could be caused by the fact you're measuring them in circuit.

    The resistors are OK, if the color bands are orange, orange, black.
    Actually the resistors and caps were all pulled for testing.

    Leave a comment:


  • jetadm123
    replied
    Re: Daytek F19AH

    Originally posted by UserName666
    OK I could not get anything to happen with the caps on resistance mode on both the digital and analog meter but when I put the digital to capacitor checker the one on J14 side read .34nF and the one on J15 side read .37nF.
    The numbers on the caps are:
    471k
    1Kv

    The resistor on J14 side is 33.8ohm and by J15 is 33.4ohm

    Pulling the inverter transformer not surprising the dark scorch mark is on the same side as the shorted transistor.
    471k = 470pf = .47nf where "k" = +/- 10% tolerance. Your measured values seem a little low, but could be caused by the fact you're measuring them in circuit.

    The resistors are OK, if the color bands are orange, orange, black.

    Leave a comment:


  • UserName666
    replied
    Re: Daytek F19AH

    OK I could not get anything to happen with the caps on resistance mode on both the digital and analog meter but when I put the digital to capacitor checker the one on J14 side read .34nF and the one on J15 side read .37nF.
    The numbers on the caps are:
    471k
    1Kv

    The resistor on J14 side is 33.8ohm and by J15 is 33.4ohm

    Pulling the inverter transformer not surprising the dark scorch mark is on the same side as the shorted transistor.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • jetadm123
    replied
    Re: Daytek F19AH

    Good detective work looking over the board and labels. Since the D444 was used in the earlier model and it looks to be the exact same board, it's probably the best choice as a replacement.

    Leave a comment:


  • PlainBill
    replied
    Re: Daytek F19AH

    Originally posted by UserName666
    OK I am gonna go ahead with these D444's. I had another look at the board and the only real difference between mine and the original post other than the transistors I can see is the stickers/markings that were added to the board afterwards:

    -Number stamp on filter cap (Original post 5718D - Mine 5914D)
    -Number stamp on transformer (Original post L0525 - Mine L0528)
    -Barcode sticker underneath the board (Original A30534134542 - Mine A30544023768)
    -Sticker by inverter (Original R0194L7200 - Mine 83A000013)
    -Sticker between coils

    The Li Shin #'s right by the 110v in on top of the board are an *exact* character for character match.
    Although the stickers previously mentioned seem to be of a little higher number on mine than in the original post which pretty much confirms my thought the F19-DH was a remake of the F19-AH so the 4060AL's were probably the newer one compared to the D444.

    I'll take the readings of those resistors and ceramic caps today and pull that inverter and post some pics of it.

    For caps: If the meter goes to infinite its shorted but if it rises one way (charging?) and drops the needle back (discharging?) then it is good. Am I correct on that statement?
    No. If you pot the meter leads across an electrolytic cap and read very low resistance (< 5 ohms) something is shorted. If it reads infinite resistance the cap may be bad - a very small cap (< 47uF) may charge so fast you miss the reading. A normal cap will show an increasing resistance, eventually showing open. If you then switch the leads it shows a decreasing negative resistance until it discharges completely, then as it starts recharging it will show an increasing positive resistance.

    PlainBill

    Leave a comment:


  • UserName666
    replied
    Re: Daytek F19AH

    OK I am gonna go ahead with these D444's. I had another look at the board and the only real difference between mine and the original post other than the transistors I can see is the stickers/markings that were added to the board afterwards:

    -Number stamp on filter cap (Original post 5718D - Mine 5914D)
    -Number stamp on transformer (Original post L0525 - Mine L0528)
    -Barcode sticker underneath the board (Original A30534134542 - Mine A30544023768)
    -Sticker by inverter (Original R0194L7200 - Mine 83A000013)
    -Sticker between coils

    The Li Shin #'s right by the 110v in on top of the board are an *exact* character for character match.
    Although the stickers previously mentioned seem to be of a little higher number on mine than in the original post which pretty much confirms my thought the F19-DH was a remake of the F19-AH so the 4060AL's were probably the newer one compared to the D444.

    I'll take the readings of those resistors and ceramic caps today and pull that inverter and post some pics of it.

    For caps: If the meter goes to infinite its shorted but if it rises one way (charging?) and drops the needle back (discharging?) then it is good. Am I correct on that statement?

    Leave a comment:


  • PlainBill
    replied
    Re: Daytek F19AH

    Originally posted by UserName666
    Hmm OK. Umm does the D444 look suitable. I'm at a loss with all those terms on the data sheets ie: "drain source on state resistance"...Not a clue lol. I have never gone this deep into circuitry. I was just trying to match the numbers on the sheets and is seem the D444 has a few values that are a little higher.
    Based on the fact that both are used on apparently identical boards, yes, it should be a good replacement. Again, I don't have any experience comparing the specs of FETs.

    PlainBill

    Leave a comment:


  • UserName666
    replied
    Re: Daytek F19AH

    Hmm OK. Umm does the D444 look suitable. I'm at a loss with all those terms on the data sheets ie: "drain source on state resistance"...Not a clue lol. I have never gone this deep into circuitry. I was just trying to match the numbers on the sheets and is seem the D444 has a few values that are a little higher.

    Leave a comment:


  • PlainBill
    replied
    Re: Daytek F19AH

    Originally posted by UserName666
    Something else I just noticed. IDK if this means anything the datasheet for the for the 4060AL is dated March 1998 while the one for the D444 is dated June 2004 so I would guess that the D444 is the improvement over the 4060AL???
    Not strictly an improvement; rather a design by another company that meets the minimum specs for the application.

    PlainBill

    Leave a comment:


  • UserName666
    replied
    Re: Daytek F19AH

    Something else I just noticed. IDK if this means anything the datasheet for the for the 4060AL is dated March 1998 while the one for the D444 is dated June 2004 so I would guess that the D444 is the improvement over the 4060AL???

    Leave a comment:


  • PlainBill
    replied
    Re: Daytek F19AH

    Originally posted by UserName666
    After a bit of digging around I looked at the Post #1 in this thread. How I thought these to PS boards were alike it seems there is indeed a difference. The drive transistors in that pic that I can make out are:
    D444
    US?822

    4060AL -
    D444 -

    Does it seem like a D444 could be suitable replacement?? If so I have readily found some on ebay and the auction says "This MOSFET transistor can be found in Xerox, Mag Innovision, and Proview LCD monitor."
    http://cgi.ebay.ph/LOT-4-AOD444-N-Ch...-/200357432833
    It's not unusual to have several alternate sources for components. That is good engineering practice.

    PlainBill

    Leave a comment:

Related Topics

Collapse

  • ohren
    Upgrading a Samsung ue55nu7096u with logic board from an ue55ru7105k -- good idea?
    by ohren
    I hope this is the right forum to post in despite not technically being a repair, but still a question of swapping boards.

    I thought I'd explore the possibility to upgrade an existing working Samsung ue55nu7096u with the logic board (and power board if needed) of a newer model (ue55ru7105k) of the same size and appearance (and resolution). The reason being I'd like the extra inputs of that board including component in, an extra HDMI port and bluetooth. Its panel is broken so I have no use for the board otherwise.

    The models launched in 2018 and 2019 respectively....
    09-08-2023, 05:24 PM
  • korben_dallas
    Will I have a bricked logic board after reflow of the GPU v-core U8900 chip on my Mid-2012 15" Retina Macbook pro?
    by korben_dallas
    Hi everyone! I'm trying to fix my black screen / failed U8900 GPU v-core on my Mid-2012 Macbook Pro 15" Retinaby doing a rework/reflow of the chip (once I determine that's the real issue; but it likely is).

    I've been disabling the GPU in NVRAM for a few years... but it's just time for a better solution.

    I'm new to soldering but the only feasible way to fix this issue is to do something myself.

    MY QUESTION:
    I've been seeing some people (on this forum mostly) run into issues with the logic board needing a serial number or it being deactivated (?)...
    02-14-2024, 12:23 AM
  • Yanleb
    LG 60PK550 Logic Control Board EBR63450301
    by Yanleb
    Hi all, I just want to share the repair of my 60PK550-UA TV set.

    The TV set was powering on, just no image. After verification, nothing wrong on the YSus or ZSus boards. Nothing wrong on the main board either.

    But I noticed that the LED was not flashing on the Logic Control Board. This is an EBR63450301. The LED is supposed to flash even with all the flat cables disconnected, with only the power cable attached.

    All the voltages measured at the electrolytic capacitors on the board were good. From top left to bottom right:
    C57: 3.30V
    C61:...
    07-20-2023, 12:38 AM
  • mferna14
    Logic Board 820-00840-A Missing EDP_BKLT_EN
    by mferna14
    Hi dear friends., I am working on a Apple MacBook Pro A1708 , Logic Board 820-00840-A that has no backlight. The logic board powers on fine, but no display. After Checking on the backlight driver chip, I found that the EDP_BKL_EN is missing. And this Power Enable comes from the PCH. So does this means this Logic board cannot be repaired & brought back to life again? The resistance from GRD to the test point of EDP_BKL_EN is around is 0.66M ohms. R8442 (0ohms) is ok. Any suggestion/Tip if any would really appreciate. ​
    07-10-2024, 05:18 PM
  • mferna14
    Logic Board 820-01987-A missing PP3V3_S5
    by mferna14
    Hi good Friends., today working on a Macbook Pro A2289, Logic board 820-01978-A. The history was liquid spill, Cleaned & replaced all corroded components & now the logic board shows 20v & .01amp on the meter. Not taking in any amps. Upon trouble shooting I get the required stable voltages 5V, PP3V3_G3H 3.3V but no PP3V3_S5. Checked the schematic, assume that this is generated from U7800. Checked all the Input/Output voltages on this chip. All is fine, except PP3V3_S5 is missing. Resistance from GND to PP3V3_S5 is 146 Kohms. First I need to make sure whether PP3V3_S5 is generated from...
    06-07-2025, 05:07 PM
  • Loading...
  • No more items.
Working...