Re: Why are crap caps still in use???
Let the customer suck up the cost then. Had this in my own thread, but it wasn't fit for my own topic. I fixed 16 Samsung 204B's a while back and am tackling 24 225BW's and two more 204B's sitting in our graveyard:
Going with the BadCaps question of "why is this still happening?", it's hard to really figure out why this happens. Like iPhones, I guess the upgrade cycle shortens and most aren't expected to keep LCD's very long so it's "Good enough" and get's them through the warranty period.
Opened up an Asus 23.6" just for giggles and found all good cap readings and great brands. So, $3 per monitor to make a quality product is all it takes? These are out of date LCD's, but most owners out there would be glad to pay more to keep them running longer instead of land-filling them. They're just computer monitors at this point though (The 225BW was my 1st LCD and replaced a Sony 22" CRT. That Sony CRT was $2,800 and still the best picture I've seen even today...so people WILL pay for quality)
Guess what's in the Panasonic 46" plasma? Awesome Pany caps. Sharp got the rights to the Pioneer Kuro panel tech, but they're using crap IC's behind that panel and just isn't the same product. They want $5,300 for a 50" and I just can't trust them to last. It just seems like a secret that there's more to a TV than the panel.
I digress. People seem to upgrade very expensive stuff these days more frequently than they use to in order to keep up with the Jones' so the product doesn't have to last. In the lower cost stuff, it's a battle of the budget. $150-180 seems to be the bloated range of displays. No one keeps a display or TV for more than 10 years. But why save $3 when making them?
_____________
I was an engineer at Intel (and AMD, and 3DFX, and...). We didn't skimp on parts like caps as our validation didn't allow variance, let alone failure. It didn't cost more in the long run because these parts just didn't die from crap 3rd party parts and cutting corners. Like OCZ, XFX/Pine, or Mushkin; they can feel good about putting lifetime warranty on their stuff due to not cutting corners. Other brands are "OK" because they clear 3 year warranties.
Let the customer suck up the cost then. Had this in my own thread, but it wasn't fit for my own topic. I fixed 16 Samsung 204B's a while back and am tackling 24 225BW's and two more 204B's sitting in our graveyard:
Going with the BadCaps question of "why is this still happening?", it's hard to really figure out why this happens. Like iPhones, I guess the upgrade cycle shortens and most aren't expected to keep LCD's very long so it's "Good enough" and get's them through the warranty period.
Opened up an Asus 23.6" just for giggles and found all good cap readings and great brands. So, $3 per monitor to make a quality product is all it takes? These are out of date LCD's, but most owners out there would be glad to pay more to keep them running longer instead of land-filling them. They're just computer monitors at this point though (The 225BW was my 1st LCD and replaced a Sony 22" CRT. That Sony CRT was $2,800 and still the best picture I've seen even today...so people WILL pay for quality)
Guess what's in the Panasonic 46" plasma? Awesome Pany caps. Sharp got the rights to the Pioneer Kuro panel tech, but they're using crap IC's behind that panel and just isn't the same product. They want $5,300 for a 50" and I just can't trust them to last. It just seems like a secret that there's more to a TV than the panel.
I digress. People seem to upgrade very expensive stuff these days more frequently than they use to in order to keep up with the Jones' so the product doesn't have to last. In the lower cost stuff, it's a battle of the budget. $150-180 seems to be the bloated range of displays. No one keeps a display or TV for more than 10 years. But why save $3 when making them?
_____________
I was an engineer at Intel (and AMD, and 3DFX, and...). We didn't skimp on parts like caps as our validation didn't allow variance, let alone failure. It didn't cost more in the long run because these parts just didn't die from crap 3rd party parts and cutting corners. Like OCZ, XFX/Pine, or Mushkin; they can feel good about putting lifetime warranty on their stuff due to not cutting corners. Other brands are "OK" because they clear 3 year warranties.
Comment