As you can check his specs there:
http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleID=409
It is a oldie but good made PSU. Sturdy, I using two of them for very very long time (probably over 3 years now) and since they use the infamous Vent cap on the 12V rail as well, as everything else by the inferior Jpcon caps, I felt that is time for a change. This one was smooth, since the design used nonstandard d 13,5mm caps - so I can use d 12,5mm Pannyes easily:
Beauty, aren't they?
The 3300uF 16V one is a BIG suxxka, tough:

The only real problem arise with the imput filtering caps. None of these Panny TS-ED caps in 1000uF 200V could fit, so I used 820uF 200V ones instead:
It should not have a negative impact.
Also I replaced the back 80mm fan, witch is not spinning up properly anymore at 5V - I use both 80 and 92mm fans there at 5V to make the PSU quiet
The results.
Ripple before recapping:
12.13V - 54.4mV
5.13V - 11.8mV
3.349V - 8.6mV
Ripple after recapping:
12.14V - 17mV
5.14V - 17.9mV
3.361V - 4.6mV
Ripple with added bridging 10uF 16V ceramics SMD caps on the caps:
12.14V - 15.2mV
5.14V - 19.2mV
3.361V - 6.2mV
Ripple after removing these SMD caps:
12.14V - 18.1mV
5.14V - 13.4mV
3.361V - 5.4mV
Conclusion.
Ripple get better w/o ceramics bridging caps. The measuring margin of error is very high and indeed changes in few mV hardly could be mentioned as positive change, however at least these new cap's does not have the smell and the ripple in 12V get notably better still
From 54mV to 17-18mV. Hmmm 
I wonder if I remove these SMD caps from some of my recapped boards, if I could overclock them higher...!
http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleID=409
It is a oldie but good made PSU. Sturdy, I using two of them for very very long time (probably over 3 years now) and since they use the infamous Vent cap on the 12V rail as well, as everything else by the inferior Jpcon caps, I felt that is time for a change. This one was smooth, since the design used nonstandard d 13,5mm caps - so I can use d 12,5mm Pannyes easily:
Beauty, aren't they?

The 3300uF 16V one is a BIG suxxka, tough:

The only real problem arise with the imput filtering caps. None of these Panny TS-ED caps in 1000uF 200V could fit, so I used 820uF 200V ones instead:
It should not have a negative impact.
Also I replaced the back 80mm fan, witch is not spinning up properly anymore at 5V - I use both 80 and 92mm fans there at 5V to make the PSU quiet

The results.
Ripple before recapping:
12.13V - 54.4mV
5.13V - 11.8mV
3.349V - 8.6mV
Ripple after recapping:
12.14V - 17mV
5.14V - 17.9mV
3.361V - 4.6mV
Ripple with added bridging 10uF 16V ceramics SMD caps on the caps:
12.14V - 15.2mV
5.14V - 19.2mV
3.361V - 6.2mV
Ripple after removing these SMD caps:
12.14V - 18.1mV
5.14V - 13.4mV
3.361V - 5.4mV
Conclusion.
Ripple get better w/o ceramics bridging caps. The measuring margin of error is very high and indeed changes in few mV hardly could be mentioned as positive change, however at least these new cap's does not have the smell and the ripple in 12V get notably better still


I wonder if I remove these SMD caps from some of my recapped boards, if I could overclock them higher...!

Comment