Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Oscilliscopes
Collapse
X
-
Re: Oscilliscopes
I like GWInstek GDS-1054B. I find the user interface waaaay better than Rigol, and on-par with Siglent. We have a GDS-1054B at work. It's pleasant to use.
At home I have a GDS-2104E, which I really like. Zippy UI, no frills. Good value.
The budget Rigol scopes are just so dang sluggish. I know everyone seems to love them, but if you've used a scope with a good UI, you will find the Rigol frustrating.
Comment
-
Re: Oscilliscopes
Originally posted by stj View Postnice.
one thing not in the manual,
if you hack the licenses then you can use a usb-dongle to connect via wifi.
i'm not sure plugging an rf emitter into a scope is a good idea - but you can do it.
One could, if they wanted to, use a USB wifi with a decent USB extension cable to distance the transceiver from the unit ...Last edited by EasyGoing1; 02-17-2021, 08:07 AM.sigpic
Comment
-
Re: Oscilliscopes
Originally posted by stj View Posti own the rigol,
try to remember that it's a 4 channel 100MHz scope for €360
you cant get a GW' with that spec for that type of price.
The 50MHz 4-channel verison is selling for <$350USD. I'm aware of how cheap the Rigol is, and while it was absolutely amazing 5-6 years ago when they got popular (and no one else could touch the price), these days, I think Siglent, GWInstek, and others give you a much more enjoyable, much less frustrating experience for comparable price.
I've used the low-cost models from Tek, GWInstek, Rigol, and Siglent in a professional setting, for many hours a day. For usability, tied between GWInstek and Siglent, second place to Tek (mostly just because it's a 10+ year old scope), and last place to Rigol.Last edited by TheLaw; 02-17-2021, 02:18 PM.
Comment
-
Re: Oscilliscopes
Originally posted by stj View Postah, but you will still have radiated energy returning on the cable!sigpic
Comment
-
Re: Oscilliscopes
Hello friends:
Siglent was the Chinese brand that I liked the most, but a failure in the firmware of their arbitrary generators has made me never buy this brand again, since I warned them about it and they never heeded my warnings, but they did about more banal things and without importance.
I usually repair and calibrate a lot of measurement equipment, from multimeters to spectrum analyzers, signal generators and many more related to RF and other measurement fields.
For years I have observed the Owon brand, and honestly they are the ones who never exaggerate in their ads, you buy what you see and do not feel cheated, with a better price than other brands. I prefer them even better than Rigol, who a few years ago manufactured and sold a large number of oscilloscopes with a faulty trigger and never made it public despite claims from only a few of its buyers.
I have quite a few bad experiences with Chinese equipment, if they are junk that you will never have a service manual or spare parts or parts, if there are any on the market, these Chinese brands will never serve you. On the other hand, these Chinese measuring devices do not comply with the regulations of your country, that is why they are sold in small quantities so as not to incur illegalities that can cost them expensive, if these Chinese devices are junk, and cannot be compared with HP / Agilent / Keysight, Tektronix, Lecroy, Rohde & Schwarz etc. Of these brand equipment can be found for quite good prices and fully operational, with a precision superior to Chinese scrap.
This is just my opinion as an electronics professional, which sometimes may not coincide with a member of this great forum, so there will always be different opinions, but any professional in the field will tell you the same as me.
Sorry for my English.
Greetings.
Comment
-
Re: Oscilliscopes
Originally posted by COSMOS2k View PostHello friends:
Siglent was the Chinese brand that I liked the most
<snip>
For years I have observed the Owon brand, and honestly they are the ones who never exaggerate in their ads, you buy what you see and do not feel cheated, with a better price than other brands. I prefer them even better than Rigol
<snip>
I have quite a few bad experiences with Chinese equipment, if they are junk that you will never have a service manual or spare parts or parts.
And the Siglent documentation has been excellent. Even the manual that came with it was laid out very professionally and printed on high-quality glossy card stock type paper in full color.
Originally posted by COSMOS2k View PostSorry for my English.
If I had any complaints about this unit so far, it would be the test leads. Some seem to be noisier than others...
For example, if you look at this graphic, you will have to zoom in and look at the horizontal line, but you can see how the different probes have more noise on them than others. These were taken from each different channel each probe on its own channel.
This image was all taken from channel 1, but I just swapped out the probes
And if it's too hard to see, I uploaded each original screen shot as well.sigpic
Comment
-
Re: Oscilliscopes
Originally posted by stj View Postmove the x1-x10 switches a few times incase they have any oxide or grease between the contactssigpic
Comment
-
Re: Oscilliscopes
Originally posted by stj View Postmove the x1-x10 switches a few times incase they have any oxide or grease between the contacts
And here is a video I took just now. Same tests signal, same channel, same probe.
I still see noise in the horizontal lines ... is it normal?sigpic
Comment
-
Re: Oscilliscopes
Originally posted by stj View Posthow much is it of you zoom?
you will always get some level of noise because of the components in the signal path.sigpic
Comment
-
Re: Oscilliscopes
Originally posted by stj View Postlooked at the vid, not sure the size of those spikes but they are super short - it could be noise from nearby equipment.sigpic
Comment
Comment