Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Apevia WIN-500XSPX recap

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 2
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 template Next
    #1

    Apevia WIN-500XSPX recap

    So I had some time this weekend to start putting together another HTPC for the kid's playroom, and thought to myself.. "Hey! I'll recap the power supply in advance so we won't have to touch this for a loooong time". It's an Apevia WIN-500XSPX that came in a Apevia X-MASTER-BK/500 HTPC case. So I went through and remove all 21, thinking that it'll be a quick one. As I go to start putting the new ones in (combination of FC/FM series, and a few BCN custom Samxon GD/RS), I run across two of the small ones that don't have their polarities marked on the PCB. No problem, I think to myself -- I have another one of these boxes out in the living room that I can reference... I open up the power supply (same HTPC case, same power supply model) and the insides are completely different! Help! I can make an educated guess, but would rather be 100% sure and avoid any fireworks.

    I've attached some pics of the unit and marked up one that have caps near the SMPS controller (a KA7500C, datasheet attached). C212 in the top left seems to be fairly obvious. The top lead connects with the top lead on the cap to its left (C213), which is connected to the screwhole (ground). I'm assuming that the negative lead of C212 should connect to ground (top hole)? For the cap south of the SMPS controller (C208), the top lead connects to pins 13/14/16 of the controller (13/14 are tied together) and the bottom lead connects to pin 4 of the controller. It seems to me that the positive lead goes towards the controller -- is this correct?

    What do you guys think of the unit? Safe to do a Q9400/4GB with a 2TB drive and quad tuner for an extended period of time?
    Attached Files
    Tags: None
    #2
    Re: Apevia WIN-500XSPX recap

    jumpered input filtering! you need to fix that. For C213, the outer leg is almost definately negative. I don't know about the other one. Having said that, though, I would not recommend that PSU for a quad core. It looks like it might do 300W or so, but that might not be enough for your system.
    I love putting bad caps and flat batteries in fire and watching them explode!!

    No wonder it doesn't work! You installed the jumper wires backwards

    Main PC: Core i7 3770K 3.5GHz, Gigabyte GA-Z77M-D3H-MVP, 8GB Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600, 240GB Intel 335 Series SSD, 750GB WD HDD, Sony Optiarc DVD RW, Palit nVidia GTX660 Ti, CoolerMaster N200 Case, Delta DPS-600MB 600W PSU, Hauppauge TV Tuner, Windows 7 Home Premium

    Office PC: HP ProLiant ML150 G3, 2x Xeon E5335 2GHz, 4GB DDR2 RAM, 120GB Intel 530 SSD, 2x 250GB HDD, 2x 450GB 15K SAS HDD in RAID 1, 1x 2TB HDD, nVidia 8400GS, Delta DPS-650BB 650W PSU, Windows 7 Pro

    Comment

      #3
      Re: Apevia WIN-500XSPX recap

      Originally posted by c_hegge View Post
      For C213, the outer leg is almost definately negative.
      Sounds right. Just follow the wire labeled "RC" and see which pin it goes to on the ATX connector. If it connects to the PS-ON (pin 16 on a 24-pin ATX connector, or pin 14 on a 20-pin ATX connector) then the cap's negative leg should definitely go to ground/case.

      Not sure about the other capacitor (C208) either.
      ----
      However, let me just say that this PSU is nowhere near good for a Q9400. It's actually quite crappy.
      Not only is the input filtering totally lacking like c_hegge mentioned, but look at the size of the rectifying diodes on the secondary heatsink - they are way too undersized! There's absolutely no way this PSU will do 500W! I'd venture to say, not even 300W. You'll be lucky if you pull 200W before one of the rectifiers blows out. And I'm talking about 200W combined, so that's even less for the 12v rail, which is what most modern systems use these days.

      Another problem is the huge loading resistors on the secondary side (10 Ohm on the 3.3v rail, 150 Ohm on the 12v rail, and another on the 5v rail I can't tell what it is). Those will cook you new caps. Remove them should you want to use this PSU in any computer.

      With that said, I wouldn't use this PSU in anything modern. At best, it's maybe okay for a Pentium 3 or an older Athlon/Duron processor.
      Sorry to sound so negative, but this PSU is just not good.
      Last edited by momaka; 12-05-2010, 01:18 AM.

      Comment

        #4
        Re: Apevia WIN-500XSPX recap

        I see everybody saying that the input rectifiers will blow up. Trust me, they won't. Even in PSUs with the 4-diode treatment - blown primary diodes are very rare, most often the switching transistors or 12v rectifiers fail. Also i only see Samxon and Meritek on the secondary - those are good caps. The output toroid is of decent size and there's pi filters too. The only thing i'd do is remove the minimum load resistors and it'll be fine.
        Originally posted by PeteS in CA
        Remember that by the time consequences of a short-sighted decision are experienced, the idiot who made the bad decision may have already been promoted or moved on to a better job at another company.
        A working TV? How boring!

        Comment

          #5
          Re: Apevia WIN-500XSPX recap

          Originally posted by momaka View Post

          With that said, I wouldn't use this PSU in anything modern. At best, it's maybe okay for a Pentium 3 or an older Athlon/Duron processor.
          It could be good for p4 1.5ghz - 2ghz SDRAM/DDR1 too.

          But only after adding a proper transient filter and making sure that the 12V rectifier is 16A or more.

          Comment

            #6
            Re: Apevia WIN-500XSPX recap

            The Q9400 has a TDP of 95 watts. That's on par with a 3GHz Pentium 4 btw. In a HTPC application hence no power hungry video card, that power supply will do fine.
            Last edited by Th3_uN1Qu3; 12-05-2010, 08:37 AM.
            Originally posted by PeteS in CA
            Remember that by the time consequences of a short-sighted decision are experienced, the idiot who made the bad decision may have already been promoted or moved on to a better job at another company.
            A working TV? How boring!

            Comment

              #7
              Re: Apevia WIN-500XSPX recap

              Excellent, thanks everyone -- looks like I have some homework to do. I'll post back when I've digested enough to continue.

              Comment

                #8
                Re: Apevia WIN-500XSPX recap

                Originally posted by Th3_uN1Qu3 View Post
                I see everybody saying that the input rectifiers will blow up.
                Everybody? Who's everybody?
                If you're referring to my post, I mentioned the rectifying diodes on the secondary heatsink, not the input diodes/bridge rectifier. As you can see, all of the secondary rectifiers in this PSU come in TO-220 package. This suggests low current output capability.

                At the very least, the current capability of the 12v rectifier should be checked. Needs to be rated for 16A or more, as goodpsusearch said.

                Comment

                  #9
                  Re: Apevia WIN-500XSPX recap

                  Originally posted by momaka View Post
                  Everybody? Who's everybody?
                  A number of people on different websites. Especially the guys at Hardware Secrets (an otherwise great resource) drive me nuts when they keep saying that on the supplies with 4-diode treatment the input rectifiers will be the first to blow up, when it's almost invariably the primary switchers which go out in their testing.
                  Originally posted by PeteS in CA
                  Remember that by the time consequences of a short-sighted decision are experienced, the idiot who made the bad decision may have already been promoted or moved on to a better job at another company.
                  A working TV? How boring!

                  Comment

                    #10
                    Re: Apevia WIN-500XSPX recap

                    The mains filtering section looks like it has been skimped on, especially when non-approved Y-class capacitors have been used...
                    My first choice in quality Japanese electrolytics is Nippon Chemi-Con, which has been in business since 1931... the quality of electronics is dependent on the quality of the electrolytics.

                    Comment

                      #11
                      Re: Apevia WIN-500XSPX recap

                      Wow, old thread. Why not give it a bump:p I have an Apevia 500W PSU that also came with an Apevia HTPC case. Same model number as this one... would you believe the board looks the same but the caps are different?
                      Of course I am having problems with mine as well. I'm still pretty noobish at this so I need a little help. I'm good at soldering, but don't know how to troubleshoot PSU's. Can someone point me in the direction of a PSU troubleshooting guide here (if one exists). Or should I just use this thread for assistance?

                      Comment

                        #12
                        Re: Apevia WIN-500XSPX recap

                        Originally posted by Lobo View Post
                        Can someone point me in the direction of a PSU troubleshooting guide here (if one exists). Or should I just use this thread for assistance?
                        I don't recall ever seeing one (but I could be wrong). Usually it's done on a thread-to-thread basis. That said, I suggest you create you own thread so that it gets more attention. And don't forget to post pictures . Good to know what exactly we are working on (and in the event someone spots something troublesome that the others didn't ).

                        Originally posted by Th3_uN1Qu3
                        A number of people on different websites. Especially the guys at Hardware Secrets (an otherwise great resource) drive me nuts when they keep saying that on the supplies with 4-diode treatment the input rectifiers will be the first to blow up, when it's almost invariably the primary switchers which go out in their testing.
                        True.

                        Comment

                          #13
                          Re: Apevia WIN-500XSPX recap

                          I would increase the capacitance of the input caps too (I don't know what the originals were though) What is the model of the rectifier on the 12V? Seem to be rare but I've seen 30A on the 12V in a TO-220 package

                          Comment

                            #14
                            Re: Apevia WIN-500XSPX recap

                            Originally posted by Lobo View Post
                            …would you believe the board looks the same but the caps are different?
                            Yes, those images are actually dhot after the recap took place.

                            Anyway, if you wanna Samxon RS 3300 uF/16 V caps, I have them
                            Less jewellery, more gold into electrotech industry! Half of the computer problems is caused by bad contacts

                            Exclusive caps, meters and more!
                            Hardware Insights - power supply reviews and more!

                            Comment

                              #15
                              Re: Apevia WIN-500XSPX recap

                              If your going to change the input caps and the output caps, why not just throw it away and buy a corsair cx430 for 19.99 after rebate. Not exactly the best supply, but better then the apevia will ever be. (Unless you live out of the US and cant order from newegg / get rebate)
                              Fixed so far 12 lcd's , 1 plasmas, 5 monitors, 0 dlp's (plan to keep the dlps at 0). and 3 atx power supplies, and 2 motherboards.

                              Comment

                                #16
                                Re: Apevia WIN-500XSPX recap

                                Originally posted by cashkennedy View Post
                                If your going to change the input caps and the output caps, why not just throw it away and buy a corsair cx430 for 19.99 after rebate. Not exactly the best supply, but better then the apevia will ever be. (Unless you live out of the US and cant order from newegg / get rebate)
                                His Apevia already has high quality capacitors, for a low end build like his why not use it? The CX430 is going to have garbage caps in it, so even in his system I bet the Apevia would outlive the Corsair before it would need a recap

                                Comment

                                  #17
                                  Re: Apevia WIN-500XSPX recap

                                  Originally posted by Pentium4 View Post
                                  His Apevia already has high quality capacitors
                                  Less jewellery, more gold into electrotech industry! Half of the computer problems is caused by bad contacts

                                  Exclusive caps, meters and more!
                                  Hardware Insights - power supply reviews and more!

                                  Comment

                                    #18
                                    Re: Apevia WIN-500XSPX recap

                                    Sorry I thought we were still talking about Wrog's Apevia

                                    Comment

                                      #19
                                      Re: Apevia WIN-500XSPX recap

                                      Wrog replaced the shitty caps in his with samxon / pannys . Who knows what was there to begin with. If you read his original post he took the pictures after redoing all the caps except the last 2 that didn't have polarity markings.

                                      The corsair cx430 according to jonnyguru came with 100% samxon caps. So if your a fan of samxon you should be happy there. (samxon is pretty middle of the road though) The corsair also has rather low ripple, well within spec. About the only downside to the cx-430 is that they're lying about it being 80 plus bronze.

                                      http://www.jonnyguru.com/modules.php...tory4&reid=214
                                      Last edited by cashkennedy; 08-12-2013, 07:29 PM.
                                      Fixed so far 12 lcd's , 1 plasmas, 5 monitors, 0 dlp's (plan to keep the dlps at 0). and 3 atx power supplies, and 2 motherboards.

                                      Comment

                                        #20
                                        Re: Apevia WIN-500XSPX recap

                                        The CX430 is indeed a good PSU for its price, and still being 80 Plus is fine in my opinion. But the Samxon they use are GF, which are worse than middle of the road. Most Samxon are pretty good caps, they have 2 "dud" series as far as I know

                                        Comment

                                        Previous 1 2 template Next
                                        Working...
                                        X