A friend of mine and I debated this the other night, and it made me think a bit................ Think of the time frame that the 'bad capacitors' live... Usually around a year or so before the motherboard/system becomes unusably flaky. I have some older socket7 and slot1 motherboards that still run today, some approaching 10 years old, never having failed caps or any other problems... This made me think even more...
Intel, AMD, Microsoft, SiS, VIA, Nvidia, Gateway, Dell, HP, and all the other manufacturers out there rely heavily on people upgrading/buying new systems in order to make money. If the systems last too long, they don't sell NEARLY as many. Think about the evolution of the actual technology... CPU's and RAM are so fast now, there's no reason why the 'core' of a system (CPU, RAM, motherboard) shouldn't last most users atleast 4-5 years without an upgrade. When a new CPU comes out for example, the gains are small versus the high costs of the upgrade, and people simply don't upgrade anymore like they used to. To the general emailing and web browsing user, a 500MHz+ system with 256mb of RAM is a very useable and viable system, and they don't really need an upgrade, until something fails, like bad caps... Back in the days of the 486 and the early Pentiums, small upgrades made HUGE improvements, it's not that way anymore... Big expensive upgrades make very little performance imporvements... So they needed new ways to sell hardware, what better way then 'predictable failures' i.e. bad capacitors... They just keep you coming back for more whether you want to or not... I'm not talking about the 'hardcore gaming' crowd, they upgrade and buy just because they think it's cool, and they think if their system is better they get more respect in their little group of other gamers... I also omit the high-end server platform, they do need the power to keep up with the always changing Internet and business world. I'm talking about the 'averge Joe' user, which makes the majority of the computer-using population, and is the largest consumer of PC's... How many computers do you think unknowingly ended up in the trash over something as simple as bad capacitors, while the owner chumped down for a new one!? Far more than I'll ever see in my lifetime...
When a motherboard fails or becomes unstable, the great majority of people that aren't tech savvy, simply go buy a new motherboard or completely upgrade their system without even thinking about it. With the technology we have today, there's absolutely NO EXCUSE for the bad capacitor plague that has doomed PC's these days. Thinking about all that sure made me rethink that this was just as simple as a bad electrolyte formula foul-up from an industrial espionage incident gone wrong... Is it possible that this is a much larger conspiracy between quite a few manufacturers, with the logic of selling more product?? It's been known in the past for AMD and Intel to secretly conspire with eachother on chip releases and technologies. The same is said about ATI and Nvidia about video card releases and GPU technologies. When it leaks out to the public, it gets quickly swept under the rug... So why not this too?! Awfully peculiar...
Sorry for the long read, but I'd like some more input..........
Intel, AMD, Microsoft, SiS, VIA, Nvidia, Gateway, Dell, HP, and all the other manufacturers out there rely heavily on people upgrading/buying new systems in order to make money. If the systems last too long, they don't sell NEARLY as many. Think about the evolution of the actual technology... CPU's and RAM are so fast now, there's no reason why the 'core' of a system (CPU, RAM, motherboard) shouldn't last most users atleast 4-5 years without an upgrade. When a new CPU comes out for example, the gains are small versus the high costs of the upgrade, and people simply don't upgrade anymore like they used to. To the general emailing and web browsing user, a 500MHz+ system with 256mb of RAM is a very useable and viable system, and they don't really need an upgrade, until something fails, like bad caps... Back in the days of the 486 and the early Pentiums, small upgrades made HUGE improvements, it's not that way anymore... Big expensive upgrades make very little performance imporvements... So they needed new ways to sell hardware, what better way then 'predictable failures' i.e. bad capacitors... They just keep you coming back for more whether you want to or not... I'm not talking about the 'hardcore gaming' crowd, they upgrade and buy just because they think it's cool, and they think if their system is better they get more respect in their little group of other gamers... I also omit the high-end server platform, they do need the power to keep up with the always changing Internet and business world. I'm talking about the 'averge Joe' user, which makes the majority of the computer-using population, and is the largest consumer of PC's... How many computers do you think unknowingly ended up in the trash over something as simple as bad capacitors, while the owner chumped down for a new one!? Far more than I'll ever see in my lifetime...
When a motherboard fails or becomes unstable, the great majority of people that aren't tech savvy, simply go buy a new motherboard or completely upgrade their system without even thinking about it. With the technology we have today, there's absolutely NO EXCUSE for the bad capacitor plague that has doomed PC's these days. Thinking about all that sure made me rethink that this was just as simple as a bad electrolyte formula foul-up from an industrial espionage incident gone wrong... Is it possible that this is a much larger conspiracy between quite a few manufacturers, with the logic of selling more product?? It's been known in the past for AMD and Intel to secretly conspire with eachother on chip releases and technologies. The same is said about ATI and Nvidia about video card releases and GPU technologies. When it leaks out to the public, it gets quickly swept under the rug... So why not this too?! Awfully peculiar...
Sorry for the long read, but I'd like some more input..........
Comment