Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

    Here's article discussing it:

    http://www.eetimes.com/design/power-...ork-in-the-US-

    You're right, seems PFC is not required but it really makes it easy to obide by all the rules if active pfc is used and possibly also passive pfc.

    The European Union (EU) has developed a current harmonic content specification (EN61000-3-2) to improve line power utilization. Meeting these harmonic current criteria can be easily accomplished by using power factor correction (PFC) boost pre-regulators. However, achieving this specification does not necessarily require a power factor controller or a high power factor.
    So those harmonics have to be met, pfc passive or active can be used for it but it's not required.

    To reduce design costs, some power-supply designers found they could meet EN/IEC61000 requirements by using other means with some filtering. The designs could pass the harmonic requirements with a PF as low as 0.8.

    However, Energy Star (Reference 1) is proposing a new PF legislation of 0.9 at full load in 2008 that will become part of the 80 Plus initiative (Reference 2). As this becomes a reality, some of the old IEC 61000 designs may not meet this new stringent requirement. In order to have a PF greater than 0.9.PFC, pre-regulators will need to be added to these designs
    So if you want to label the psu as 80plus you need to use some form of pfc


    later edit: this url seems to be a powerpoint presentation discussing the IEC 61000-3 standard : https://cdn.badcaps-static.com/pdfs/...53d00d3604.pdf

    this also has some good info : https://cdn.badcaps-static.com/pdfs/...62c0d0ae47.pdf

    hint : type in google "IEC 61000-3 filetype:pdf" and you get more.

    <- this seems like the official standard 61000-3-3
    Last edited by mariushm; 12-01-2012, 05:03 PM.

    Comment


      Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

      Pics of another gutless wonder from a friend:






      After just a year of use this wonder went and he was lucky the attached comp survived the ordeal. Keeps blowing the fuse.

      I told him to forget about repairing and don't waste any effort on it.

      Comment


        Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

        Maybe the NTC Thermistor is shorted? And man that thing sure could use some input filtering! Could you post a picture of the label?

        Comment


          Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

          I'd say 300-350 W?
          Less jewellery, more gold into electrotech industry! Half of the computer problems is caused by bad contacts

          Exclusive caps, meters and more!
          Hardware Insights - power supply reviews and more!

          Comment


            Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

            Not with the fake 330uF. If they are real, I put continuous power at 150W; but if they are fake 220uF (from the size they look to be around that, and I've seen it before in cheapies) I'd say squeezing any more than 100W would be asking for trouble.

            Problem is with those caps being so small, the transistors have to work in overdrive to put more current through the transformer to keep the output stable. They usually don't manage it so you see 600~1000mVp-p of ripple on the output in a 100Hz sawtooth wave. See this picture from a "430W" PSU with 350W load. It used 680uF primaries, predicting 340W max output... and the ripple is already through the roof:
            http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/artic...y-Review/332/7

            Notice how the ripple peaks every 10ms -- this is no coincidence. It is at 100Hz, so is due to lacklustre primary bulk caps.

            And of course, the transistors don't last as long... probably one of the contributions to them going bang!
            Please do not PM me with questions! Questions via PM will not be answered. Post on the forums instead!
            For service manual, schematic, boardview (board view), datasheet, cad - use our search.

            Comment


              Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

              U think I am stupid? Was guessing label power…
              Less jewellery, more gold into electrotech industry! Half of the computer problems is caused by bad contacts

              Exclusive caps, meters and more!
              Hardware Insights - power supply reviews and more!

              Comment


                Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

                Originally posted by Behemot View Post
                U think I am stupid? Was guessing label power…
                Sorry, that wasn't obvious from your post.
                Please do not PM me with questions! Questions via PM will not be answered. Post on the forums instead!
                For service manual, schematic, boardview (board view), datasheet, cad - use our search.

                Comment


                  Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

                  Originally posted by tom66 View Post
                  It used 680uF primaries, predicting 340W max output... and the ripple is already through the roof:
                  http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/artic...y-Review/332/7

                  Notice how the ripple peaks every 10ms -- this is no coincidence. It is at 100Hz, so is due to lacklustre primary bulk caps.

                  And of course, the transistors don't last as long... probably one of the contributions to them going bang!
                  I don't think the primary capacitors are the reason for it being so inefficient. It only has a single TO-220 switcher rather than a TO-247 or TO-3P switcher - that's going to hurt it badly. This review of the Antec/Delta VP350 shows it doing 350W (though it exploded at 475W) with only a pair of 470uF/220V/105C CapXon capacitors, and the voltage regulation, noise, and ripple suppression was excellent, though the efficiency as an overall was only 76%. With very good cooling, superb AC/DC filtering, and enough of an overspec'd secondary and primary otherwise, I think you might be able to get away with smaller primary capacitors, though certainly not with fantastic efficiency. Granted, I also know that Delta design their PSUs such that their components aren't stressed, so that also helps, but even then...
                  Last edited by Wester547; 12-04-2012, 06:10 PM.

                  Comment


                    Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

                    This is an exception of the rule.

                    Comment


                      Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

                      Yes, it uses a different topology though. The coincidence with capacitance =~ output power only appears to work for half bridge and flyback designs. With a different transformer design, you can get away with smaller capacitors.
                      Please do not PM me with questions! Questions via PM will not be answered. Post on the forums instead!
                      For service manual, schematic, boardview (board view), datasheet, cad - use our search.

                      Comment


                        Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

                        No pic but the man tells me the label pretended to be 500W, no less .

                        Comment


                          Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

                          Oh my. It can't even do a third of that. My favourite is this PSU claiming 1050W, but only capable of a mere ~600W...
                          http://www.jonnyguru.com/modules.php...Story&reid=187

                          And again, 1200uF, so should be 600W capable, and it just starts topping out then with ripple through the roof.
                          Last edited by tom66; 12-04-2012, 06:48 PM.
                          Please do not PM me with questions! Questions via PM will not be answered. Post on the forums instead!
                          For service manual, schematic, boardview (board view), datasheet, cad - use our search.

                          Comment


                            Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

                            In fact we can see the label with a remarkably mendacious '500W' at the top of the second pic .

                            Comment


                              Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

                              It says 500W MAX But not for how big fractions of a second
                              Less jewellery, more gold into electrotech industry! Half of the computer problems is caused by bad contacts

                              Exclusive caps, meters and more!
                              Hardware Insights - power supply reviews and more!

                              Comment


                                Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

                                Originally posted by tom66 View Post
                                Yes, it uses a different topology though. The coincidence with capacitance =~ output power only appears to work for half bridge and flyback designs. With a different transformer design, you can get away with smaller capacitors.
                                Even more confusing, though, is that this power supply manages 300W in what appears to be half bridge topology with only 330uF/200V/85C OST SPS input capacitors (link)! Granted, the medium speed, 80mm ADDA fan in there seems to be running at about full speed the whole time by comparison to the more temperature controlled fans seen in other PSUs, and the +12V rail's voltage regulation is somewhat dismaying (though still within spec especially since the whole PSU is at 77% efficiency), but even then....
                                Last edited by Wester547; 12-05-2012, 03:43 AM.

                                Comment


                                  Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

                                  I can definitely see what looks to be a sawtooth wave on the output of the 12V, which looks too clean for normal switching noise so it's probably 100Hz. There's no obvious scale but once that starts exceeding normal ripple (~50mVp-p?) you really have a problem...
                                  Please do not PM me with questions! Questions via PM will not be answered. Post on the forums instead!
                                  For service manual, schematic, boardview (board view), datasheet, cad - use our search.

                                  Comment


                                    Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

                                    For +12 V/-12 V its 120 mV. Man, at 50 mV, 90 % of market would be out of spec
                                    Less jewellery, more gold into electrotech industry! Half of the computer problems is caused by bad contacts

                                    Exclusive caps, meters and more!
                                    Hardware Insights - power supply reviews and more!

                                    Comment


                                      Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

                                      Originally posted by tom66 View Post
                                      Yes, it uses a different topology though. The coincidence with capacitance =~ output power only appears to work for half bridge and flyback designs. With a different transformer design, you can get away with smaller capacitors.
                                      I also wonder if it was because of the 20AWG wires by comparison to the 18AWG wires used - if I'm not mistaken there's about a 60% difference between what they can handle in amperage per wire (though it varies per wire even then, IIRC). Could that be the reason, rather than diverging topologies making it easier for primary capacitors to "store" energy?

                                      EDIT: Oh, well, I would think the efficiency is lowered even with a voltage drop. ^^;
                                      Last edited by Wester547; 12-06-2012, 12:39 AM.

                                      Comment


                                        Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

                                        If the wire cannot handle it, it just creates voltage drop, how can it affect power? Only way I can think of is the consuming device taking even more current when voltage goes down (that's what VRMs do though).
                                        Less jewellery, more gold into electrotech industry! Half of the computer problems is caused by bad contacts

                                        Exclusive caps, meters and more!
                                        Hardware Insights - power supply reviews and more!

                                        Comment


                                          Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

                                          A voltage drop across a wire is wasted power: P = V * I. So too-small wire gauge can affect the over-all efficiency. Theoretically, the safety agencies made sure the wire gauge was adequate for the current. But if the agency marks are fake, or the P/S mfr used a smaller wire gauge than what they submitted to the safety agency ...
                                          PeteS in CA

                                          Power Supplies should be boring: No loud noises, no bright flashes, and no bad smells.
                                          ****************************
                                          To kill personal responsibility, initiative or success, punish it by taxing it. To encourage irresponsibility, improvidence, dependence and failure, reward it by subsidizing it.
                                          ****************************

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X