Thank you to the guys at HEGE supporting Badcaps [ HEGE ] [ HEGE DEX Chart ]

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Processor metrics

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Processor metrics

    Is there a database of processor (i.e., CHIP) metrics that can help me sort out which machines to keep/discard based on their intended workloads?

    (not just a generic benchmark for particular "PCs" but, rather, for the CPUs themselves)

    #2
    Re: Processor metrics

    cpu world has benchmarks for all cpu's
    http://www.cpu-world.com/index.html

    it also lets you cross reference to see what will fit into a specific mobo socket - good for upgrades.

    Comment


      #3
      Re: Processor metrics

      Originally posted by stj View Post
      cpu world has benchmarks for all cpu's
      http://www.cpu-world.com/index.html

      it also lets you cross reference to see what will fit into a specific mobo socket - good for upgrades.
      Doubtful that I'll ever deal with replacing a "chip" as I tend to upgrade by replacing entire machines. I'm more interested in comparisons of CPU1@speed1 w/memory1@bandwidth1 vs. CPU2@speed2 w/memory2@bandwidth2

      Thanks!

      Comment


        #4
        Re: Processor metrics

        Passmark
        Cap Datasheet Depot: http://www.paullinebarger.net/DS/
        ^If you have datasheets not listed PM me

        Comment


          #5
          Re: Processor metrics

          Originally posted by Uranium-235 View Post
          Passmark
          Yeah, I thought about running it on the machines in question. But, it hides too many details. How sensitive is would the targeted application(s) be to disk performance? How capable of exploiting additional cores? Memory bandwidth (vs. CPU speed)?

          I'm looking, instead, for something that lets me give zero-th order estimates of what is likely to be more "useful" (in hardware) to a particular application. E.g., a single threaded app would benefit from higher memory bandwidth than from a second core. Applications with high amounts of "locality of reference" win from bigger caches. etc.

          Comment

          Working...
          X