Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

    So you're in some computer service department?
    Less jewellery, more gold into electrotech industry! Half of the computer problems is caused by bad contacts

    Exclusive caps, meters and more!
    Hardware Insights - power supply reviews and more!

    Comment


      Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

      Yeah but mostly production

      Comment


        Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

        Originally posted by Pentium4 View Post
        Customers recycle their old computers and I have dibs on pretty much anything that I want, and the rest goes to a company that takes what we don't want. I reuse lots of parts and sell used computers as well
        I*wish I could do that. It sounds fun.

        Comment


          Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

          Got 2 PSUs to teardown ... here is the first one.

          ~~~

          Oh deer!

          "VPower" branded DEER

          Original owner said it smelled like it was burning ... I think it was burning! Surprised there are no bad caps, however I think the PSU was only being used for about a week or so...

          Have fun looking at the pics!

          P.S. notice the Rulycon capacitor
          P.S.2. The case is almost as thin as tinfoil, it takes almost no effort to bend it!...
          Attached Files
          Last edited by ben7; 08-08-2013, 09:45 AM.
          Muh-soggy-knee

          Comment


            Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

            Second PSU ...

            "@power" brand - not sure who made it, doesn't seem like DEER though

            I believe it still works. No bulged capacitors either, and better heatsinks than the DEER. I like the bountiful holes in the back of the PSU, it certainly would be good for a project case! The metal is flimsy though ...

            But, it does have the two diodes on a bracket treatment!
            Attached Files
            Muh-soggy-knee

            Comment


              Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

              What are the rest of the caps in the VPower, Viva? Also curious about the fan, maybe a Foxconn fan?? I bet it could do 250W heavy on the 5V if the fan runs at full speed in a cold room and depending on the rectifiers. Rulycon

              What are the markings on the main transformer of the @Power? 2 diodes on a bracket, ouch!

              Comment


                Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

                Originally posted by Pentium4 View Post
                What are the rest of the caps in the VPower, Viva? Also curious about the fan, maybe a Foxconn fan?? I bet it could do 250W heavy on the 5V if the fan runs at full speed in a cold room and depending on the rectifiers. Rulycon

                What are the markings on the main transformer of the @Power? 2 diodes on a bracket, ouch!
                The caps in the Vpower are Viva, a few CapXon and Rulycon.

                The caps in the @power are Saturn, Su'scon, and Koshin.

                Not sure of the fan brand, didn't look

                However, both units have their fan wired right to the 12v.

                The Vpower, ugh, look at how there is only a tiny diode for the 5v standby! Plus, the biggest cap on the 5v standby is an un-vented 220uF unit. There is an LM7805 regulator on the heatsink though!
                Muh-soggy-knee

                Comment


                  Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

                  That's horrible! Thing must have high ripple on the standby. I think the @Power is a Deer as well, I've only ever seen "Julon" inductors in Deer PSU's, it's got the classic 2003 chip, and Deer loves those Yang Chun Saturn caps

                  Comment


                    Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

                    Originally posted by Pentium4 View Post
                    That's horrible! Thing must have high ripple on the standby. I think the @Power is a Deer as well, I've only ever seen "Julon" inductors in Deer PSU's, it's got the classic 2003 chip, and Deer loves those Yang Chun Saturn caps
                    Interesting thing is, nowhere in or on the PSU does it say DEER!

                    Both PSUs have the EI-33 size transformers.
                    Muh-soggy-knee

                    Comment


                      Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

                      That is weird...I still think it's a Deer though. Aww how cute, it thinks it can do 430W peak

                      Comment


                        Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

                        Saturn caps We can blow you to Saturn and beyond! Isn't that great slogan?
                        Less jewellery, more gold into electrotech industry! Half of the computer problems is caused by bad contacts

                        Exclusive caps, meters and more!
                        Hardware Insights - power supply reviews and more!

                        Comment


                          Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

                          Originally posted by behemot View Post
                          saturn caps We can blow you to saturn and beyond! Isn't that great slogan?
                          rofl
                          Things I've fixed: anything from semis to crappy Chinese $2 radios, and now an IoT Dildo....

                          "Dude, this is Wyoming, i hopped on and sent 'er. No fucking around." -- Me

                          Excuse me while i do something dangerous


                          You must have a sad, sad boring life if you hate on people harmlessly enjoying life with an animal costume.

                          Sometimes you need to break shit to fix it.... Thats why my lawnmower doesn't have a deadman switch or engine brake anymore

                          Follow the white rabbit.

                          Comment


                            Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

                            Originally posted by ben7 View Post
                            The caps in the Vpower are Viva, a few CapXon and Rulycon.
                            Wow, that is one classic Deer! I bet the production date code indicates late 90's or possibly early 2000's. Does this look familiar? (it should... it's a L&C LC235-ATX. Posted here.)
                            Only a week of service? Ouch! Probably has Rulycon caps on the 5VSB critical cap spot too. Speaking on which, note the 5VSB design in this Deer - it's self-resonant without feedback as indicated by the lack of an optocoupler next to the 5VSB transformer.

                            Originally posted by Pentium4
                            That's horrible! Thing must have high ripple on the standby.
                            Actually, no. The 7805 regulator cleans up the 5VSB quite nicely. Probably even better than most good PSUs of today. The raw output of the 5VSB transformer is around 9V or so (IIRC) and the 7805 regulator then brings that down to 5V. Horrible for the efficiency? - absolutely! But you get clean power. And it also protects the motherboard from damage when the 5vsb's "critical" cap goes bad. Unfortunately, the PWM controller gets its power from an auxiliary winding on the 5VSB transformer too, but there is nothing to protect the PWM controller other than a simple resistor to limit the current. And those burn marks on the VPower are exactly from that. Just change the critical cap with a good one, and all should be well.
                            ...
                            But then again, not like that PSU is worth fixing up. It has the "diodes-on-a-bracket" rectifier for the 12V rail and needs lots of other parts to make it complete.

                            Originally posted by Pentium4
                            I think the @Power is a Deer as well, I've only ever seen "Julon" inductors in Deer PSU's, it's got the classic 2003 chip, and Deer loves those Yang Chun Saturn caps
                            Yep , it's a L&C unit (a.k.a. Deer... a.k.a. Allied) - same platform as this PSU, actually (it's the B300-ATX in this post). The company that actually makes them is called Solytech. 370forlife knows a lot more about this than I do, though.

                            Comment


                              Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

                              I just scrapped the Vpower one.

                              Yeah, that does look similar mariushm! The PCB on mine says rev 2.02
                              Yeah I noticed the lack of feedback on the standby circuit.

                              Surprisingly the Vpower has decent soldering, not hard to melt at all. I found a 220uF 10v rulycon hiding too. Oh yeah, and two "Jun Fu" caps hiding as well!
                              Muh-soggy-knee

                              Comment


                                Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

                                Originally posted by momaka View Post
                                Actually, no. The 7805 regulator cleans up the 5VSB quite nicely. Probably even better than most good PSUs of today. The raw output of the 5VSB transformer is around 9V or so (IIRC) and the 7805 regulator then brings that down to 5V. Horrible for the efficiency? - absolutely! But you get clean power.
                                This is sort of off-topic, but it has me wondering... I'm sure you're familiar with how many older Hipro and Delta/Newton power supplies almost always have a 7912 regulator for the -12V rail and a 7905 regulator for the even older ones with -5V rails, often soldered to a heatsink (older Sirtec PSUs also have 7905 regulators on a heatsink for the -5V rail). Do those three-terminal regulators just regulate the rail or are they actually there in order to generate and convert the voltages to negative, thusly lowering the efficiency on those rails (though they're hardly ever used if at all for anything) but for a much cleaner output? I ask because I was of the impression that those power supplies already have the correct windings in the main transformer for the -5V (if present) and -12V rails and that the +5V/+12V toroid (in group regulated designs) also regulates the -5V/-12V rails to some extent.
                                Last edited by Wester547; 08-08-2013, 06:55 PM.

                                Comment


                                  Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

                                  Usually there is winding but for higher and unregualted voltage. Regulators make it quite nice with high precision and low ripple. I think many todays PSUs could have much better -12 V rail results with similar price but the rail allows +-10 % and 120 mV so who cares…well, I do
                                  Less jewellery, more gold into electrotech industry! Half of the computer problems is caused by bad contacts

                                  Exclusive caps, meters and more!
                                  Hardware Insights - power supply reviews and more!

                                  Comment


                                    Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

                                    Originally posted by ben7 View Post
                                    I just scrapped the Vpower one.
                                    You mean you didn't pull any components off of it?? Not that there is much in there, but stilll... shame shame shame

                                    Originally posted by ben7 View Post
                                    Yeah, that does look similar mariushm!
                                    Ummm.... wrong guy?
                                    Okay, close enough. He's my Romanian neighbor after all

                                    Originally posted by Wester547
                                    Do those three-terminal regulators just regulate the rail or are they actually there in order to generate and convert the voltages to negative, thusly lowering the efficiency on those rails (though they're hardly ever used if at all for anything) but for a much cleaner output?
                                    Like Behemot said, those power supplies usually have unregulated -5V and -12V rails that are actually higher than -5V and -12V. Then those regulators drop the voltage down and regulate it with really good precision. Because they are linear regulators, however, the voltage they drop through them to regulate the output gets converted to heat. If there's only a low or no load on the output, then the efficiency of the -5V and -12V rails isn't really affected. However, as the load increases, those linear regulators start to dissipate a lot more heat. Hence why they are rated usually for only around 1A output. But none of today's systems use the negative voltage rails, so why PSU manufacturers don't put a regulator on the -12V rail is beyond me as well.

                                    I think Bestec (at least their older 250W and 300W units) are the worst when it comes to -12V rail regulation, in terms of circuit design that is. They use a linear self-regulating load. Usually consists of a sub-100 Ohm resistor (usually 75 Ohms), a BJT transistor, and a 12V Zener diode. The way it works is that the transistors takes current from the -12V rail and feeds it to the resistor, which is connected to ground on one side. When the voltage on the -12V rail rises, the transistor feeds more current to the resistor in hopes of loading down the -12V rail and thus bringing the voltage down. When the voltage on the -12V rail decreases, the transistor does the opposite. But this is stupid, because it wastes a lot of power and makes the loading resistor incredibly hot. I took out this circuit on the two Bestec PSUs I have, and there's hardly any difference on the output of the -12V rail.

                                    Comment


                                      Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

                                      Thanks for the explanation. I think you once found a 1000uF, 16V CapXon KM that bloated on its own in the -12V output of a Bestec... perhaps that self-regulating linear circuit is the reason? Also, I know that most of the time you will find a MOSFET (or three-terminal regulator) and a 431 shunt in a circuit that uses linear regulated DC-DC conversion. Is it possible to linear regulate a rail only using a 431 shunt or would a FET (or another three terminal regulator) of sorts also be a requirement?

                                      Comment


                                        Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

                                        Originally posted by Wester547 View Post
                                        Thanks for the explanation. I think you once found a 1000uF, 16V CapXon KM that bloated on its own in the -12V output of a Bestec... perhaps that self-regulating linear circuit is the reason?
                                        No, CapXon are just that crappy. The -12V loading resistor was far away from that cap.

                                        Originally posted by Wester547 View Post
                                        Is it possible to linear regulate a rail only using a 431 shunt or would a FET (or another three terminal regulator) of sorts also be a requirement?
                                        For the large loads PSU rails are made to handle, you do need a MOSFET or a BJT. A 431 shunt can regulate its output only to a few milliamps. Cascading it with a FET or BJT allows the FET or BJT to handle all of the loading. Since this is a linear DC-DC regulator circuit, the voltage difference between the input and output of the FET/BJT multiplied by the current drawn from the output of the FET/BJT is the power that the FET/BJT has to dissipate. So a heavy load = lots of heat produced by the FET/BJT. A 431 shunt is too small to dissipate that much heat, even if you did attach it to a heat sink. A TO-220 FET/BJT can usually dissipate several 10s of watts with a proper heat sink.
                                        Last edited by momaka; 08-08-2013, 11:16 PM.

                                        Comment


                                          Re: the gutless, bloated, and fried power supply hall of shame

                                          Originally posted by momaka View Post
                                          No, CapXon are just that crappy. The -12V loading resistor was far away from that cap.
                                          I agree that CapXon is horrible (probably the worst of the commonly known brands...), but I wonder if that self-regulating circuit squandered lots of power through the capacitor (unless it's after the capacitor and not before)? Another interesting talking point was brought up by ben7 in another thread regarding power bricks... a capacitor doesn't have to be next to a hot component in order to be cooked. Heat is still conducted through the PCB substrate, PCB traces, and ambient air. So I wonder if a lot of these inefficient and shoddy circuits do play a huge part in curtailing the life of capacitors in the outputs they're connected to, such as two transistor +5VSB circuits.

                                          It's probably more what you said, though. I've seen CapXon fail everywhere, even in very low stress applications.

                                          Originally posted by momaka
                                          For the large loads PSU rails are made to handle, you do need a MOSFET or a BJT. A 431 shunt can regulate its output only to a few milliamps. Cascading it with a FET or BJT allows the FET or BJT to handle all of the loading. Since this is a linear DC-DC regulator circuit, the voltage difference between the input and output of the FET/BJT multiplied by the current drawn from the output of the FET/BJT is the power that the FET/BJT has to dissipate. So a heavy load = lots of heat produced by the FET/BJT. A 431 shunt is too small to dissipate that much heat, even if you did attach it to a heat sink. A TO-220 FET/BJT can usually dissipate several 10s of watts with a proper heat sink.
                                          That's what I figured. For power supplies that don't have -12V and -5V linear regulators to regulate those rails, does the main transformer already have the appropriate voltages in the windings for those outputs or do they just remain higher and unregulated? And does the +5V/+12V toroid still regulate the -5V/-12V rails at all when they use linear regulators?
                                          Last edited by Wester547; 08-09-2013, 01:00 AM.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X