so on to the testing then. when you turn on the meter you have to touch the probes together and then press the on button again to zero them in.
Here are some test results from my collection. The sanyo was from a board in use for about a year and the Panasonic were new, the other caps were removed from unstable boards.
Sanyo WG 2200uf 6.3v : 0.0 ohm (too small to measure)
Panasonic FC 1000uf 50v : 0.01 ohm
Panasonic FC 3300uf 6.3v : 0.02 ohm
Ost 1000uf 6.3v : 0.04 ohm
Chhsi 1000uf 6.3 : 0.06 ohm
GSC LE 3300uf 6.3v (bulging) : 0.27 ohm
Gloria 1000uf 50v (bulging) : 1.1 ohm
Jackcon 1000uf 10v : (bulging) : 1.5 ohm
Jackcon 1500uf 6.3v (bulging) : 1.6 ohm
JPCON 2200uf 6.3v (bulging) 2.1 ohm
Lelon 1500uf 10v (bulging) : 2.78 ohm
Gloria 1500uf 6.3v (bulging) 5.0 ohm
So is the meter accurate? The panasonic FC 3300uf 6.3v should read 0.038 according to panasonic, so a reading of 0.02 is not bad. It doesnt really have the range to test between good low esr caps of various types.
Anyway that is not what it is for, it is for determining which caps have developed high esr and should be replaced. If you check the above table you can see that the caps which are bad have readings many times more than the good caps. They are all low esr caps taken from motherboards. In a test environment we should be checking their spec sheets to see how off spec they are. However in this quick example you can immediately spot caps which now have unacceptable esr for motherboard use. So the meter is easy to use even in a basic way.
If you think that you could use the meter to test for bad caps that will fail, no it cannot do that job. Even a cap from a bad manufacturer will test with low esr in the beginning but will not be able to perform to that spec after some months/years.
There are some notes in the manual which are relevant :
The manual notes that the device cannot discriminate between a cap which has very low esr and one which is short circuited or very leaky. So if you get a reading which is suprisingly low then you should remove the cap from the circuit and test its resistance with a multimeter.
It also notes a rare failure mode of caps where the esr is ok but the capacitance has dropped by a large amount. So if you have a circuit that is faulting but the caps measure ok then you should disconnect the caps and test them with a capacitance meter. If you dont have one you could try putting some good caps in parallel with them and see if the circuit improves.
There is another important note which says that when testing caps in circuit you have to be careful that caps are not connected in parallel and the results are thereby affected. In this case a good cap can make the esr measurement of a bad one seem ok when it is not.
Conclusion : is the meter going to be useful? well certainly it is a great addition to my toolkit. I could have used it yesterday actually. Test equipment is great because it helps you understand the situation better and adds to your knowledge of the failure mode of components. However it is important to spend your money wisely and get equipment that you can really use and need.
In the case of capacitors the visual inspection is not really enough to determine that caps have failed. we do know that some brands eventually start operating off spec without visible signs. So in those cases the meter is really useful. I will also be using it to check also the small caps that we dont usually recap to see whether they are performing on spec or not.
How is the supplier? well EVB have a good service and good communications so i would recommend them as a supplier. How about the price? well all test equipment is expensive and especially devices which are not produced and sold in large quantities. There is quite a bit of work to assemble one of these units so there has to be some consideration of that also. The other suppliers offer similar prices too so its ok.