![]() |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#21 | |
|
Badcaps Veteran
|
Quote:
I tested them both and the results were posted here. I'm currently debugging a Delphi system (Time Clock) and I'm busy now, but give me an hour or two, and I'll pull the boards with the chips and recheck them and get back here with the results. Maybe I'm wrong, but I can't think of anything other than this Delphi code someone messed with. Give me some time. Eduardo
__________________
There are 10 kind of people in this world: those that understand binary, and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Badcaps Veteran
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 235
|
Thanks, eguevarae
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 94
|
I'm a newbie at all this, but I'm about 90% sure that it was the 1505 IC that was bad. The bad one has no continuity between 3 and 5. Remember the burn on the back of the board? It lines up perfectly with this IC. I have another good IC that does have continuity between 3 and 5 like yours--so I'm thinking it's not your ICs.
I just did a horrible job soldering a good one in. Best of luck. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Badcaps Veteran
|
Quote:
My IC is, as far as I know, BAD How I arrived to that conclusion? Desoldering the 5 pins in both the bad and a good chip (see post #2 for a good example of something you should not do. Kids, don't try this at home ..... this is only for professional IC Killers... ). The pins measured 0.9 ohms between them, both ways. I have pics of before the test, close ups of the bad IC with the pins lifted and even a piece of paper between the pins and the circuit board. Obviously GND (Pin 3) was connected still, as it is the pad too, but the other 4 are/were not. I even had a pic of the reading, and the last pics are of the board as it was stored, still pins lifted. The one that was good and is now destroyed, didn't measure like that. I can't find the readings, maybe because I destroyed it and the readings were not important anymore. I know (well, I think) that there is more damage to the board, and that's the reason it is in the Cold Cases Container, until I get proficient enough to fix it (I have resolved one Cold case : The Proview 568, so this one has still hope ...).I don't know your particular case, but you can try to just lift (very carefully) the pins and test. Maybe your problem is different. I hope this helps. Eduardo It pays off to take pictures of everything you tear apart after all.... yet, my wife says I picture my stuff more than her ..... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Badcaps Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2008
City & State: WALES UK
Posts: 459
|
Quote:
I have missed your post till now,thanks, I hope and think your right, I hope I havent got my wires crossed with Eduardo and this thread, will RE read fully, many thxs bob |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Badcaps Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2008
City & State: WALES UK
Posts: 459
|
Hello Eduardo
thanks for your info, by mavericks last post I think my wires are crossed, will RE read thread fully as it may be that I have misunderstood your conclusions, thxs bob |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Badcaps Veteran
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 94
|
Here's some better shots of my board as it stands now:
Notice the dark pits where the arms of the IC used to lay in the board. Is this reparable? If so, how? Should I just fill the pits with solder? |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Badcaps Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2008
City & State: WALES UK
Posts: 459
|
Hello maverick,
You dont say if the monitor is working in that condition, with that alteration you made, if its not working as I presume, then I think you would be better off with it removed, so the guys can see the tracks and make suggestions, I think myself that it wont be that hard to save, remove that alteration and post new pictures, if I was you, (thats if it hasnt worked) bob |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|